LMFAO

LMFAO

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/B8R4BAQf7is
thesixthaxis.com/2013/02/03/pachter-reckons-ps4-can-render-games-at-240-fps/
ign.com/articles/2014/02/07/art-of-balance-announced-for-wii-u
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

in 2019, yeah.

playstation 5watch

Read the headline and immediately thought "hah, sounds like something Pachter would say".
He's so predictable in his dumb predictions.

>and still no games
lmao

In reality - 4K 30fps

>Pachter

Why the fuck does he still have a job?

I doubt a console would ever have 240fps.
There is literally no point.

There really does come a time where people can't tell the difference anymore.

>Pachter
2k 60fps if a miracle happens

>Expected
No shit sherlock, it would be hard for them to shift hardware without some sort of buzzword.

It's also expected to have an ethernet port and use electricity aswell.

>Patcher

youtu.be/B8R4BAQf7is

>more graphics and fps make better games

and this is why Sony's E3 conference this year was nothing but Press X to awesome ''''games'''

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

How does this guy still have a job, he's clueless on everything.
i mean 4K and 240 Hz, NASA computers can't even do that.

>240 fps

What the fuck

Yeah and I'm going to lose my virginity to a pretty girl who loves me for me.

>240fps

no. they'll sacrifice fps for better gfx.

>oh shit we're at 240fps?
>yeah ain't it sweet
>put more units on the screen
>but what about the frames
>fuck em. 30 fps is good enough

>240fps
That's pretty retarded even for Pachter.

>Michael Pachter

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Why are Nintenbros/PCbro/Xbros getting so mad about this?

This coming from the man who told people to buy Blockbuster shares over Netflix shares.

PS4 could also achieve 4k and 240fps, what a fucking meaningless statement.

Not mad but being realistic. This gen was expected to have all games running at 60fps in full HD but the vast majority of games don't.

oh fuck off you're even dumber

you can do 4k and over 240fps super easy at something like cs 1.6

lol yea ok

Remember when Ps3 expected to achieve Full HD and limitless rendering objects because of the Cell?

Remember the last time Pachter was right?


The Ps5 will be a little bit stronger than the Ps4 Pro with a better cpu and more Ram thats it

they couldn't even get crash fucking bandicoot running at 60fps

No one's mad this Pacter jew "expert" has just been wrong a thousand times

some stop Sony 240fps is only for PC!!!!!!!!!!!!

What does Pachter even do? How do I get a comfy office job where I do nothing but spew out bullshit predictions?

I had the same reaction.

"Who the fuck said this, Pachter?"

>mfw it was

Became a parody of himself a long time ago.

>we are going to have stable 60fps on ps3
>we are going to have stable 60 fps on ps4
>we are going to have stable 240 fps on ps5
For fuck sake, try to get atleast 60, sony

Convert to judaism

do any vidya consoles support above 60hz besides the PS2 kinda sorta technically being capable of it?

>according to analyst

also
>native 4k
>240fps
Oh man this will totally make video games good again.

>Michael Pachter

This guy must suck really good dick, otherwise I have no idea why he is still employed. He's wrong so often that it's mindboggeling.

and we can do 8k 480Hz at something like pong

That was not the point and we all know it's not the typical game that's implied in OP's pic, can't wait for uncharted at 4K 240Hz

>Just got the PS4
>Now I have to get the PS5
T...thanks

And yet still no games

>280FPS
in minecraft maybe lmao, plus 60ghz+ TV's are not a thing

According to the master race resolution and framerate is all it takes for a game to be good.

>According to analyst
Is code for we need something to pad our news feed.

This. It's been like this every single generation since forever, devs putting graphics above anything else, I don't see why it would change.

nobody said that faggot, if the game is good then the graphics are just an extra

but there are tv with 800hz?

He literally said the same about the PS4.
thesixthaxis.com/2013/02/03/pachter-reckons-ps4-can-render-games-at-240-fps/

>future will solve all our current problems, analysts hope
sure is news in there.

bruh

in reality 60 fps and upscaled 2k

Anything above 120fps is not really making a huge difference. However I could see 120fps console gaming become a thing since putting all the system power into realistic graphics may be very costly to do, and stylized games wouldn't need the horsepower.

>Michael Pachter

The first Wii nearly screwed that up with its popularity but the motion shit never caught on with PS3 and 360 players

*snort* PC master race amiright ? *snort*

After the PS4pro, and the Xbox One X, came out? I'm not sure people are ready for another console generation.

lel, they're primed and ready to buy a new box every two years

of course

4K (1080p) 30fps (with drops)

Given the X and Pro aren't selling anywhere near the numbers of the main boxes? I'd disagree.

>240 fps
Is there anything that would actually benefit from a framerate that high? How much does VR need? But seeing how it's sony I'd say that some unreasonable framerate might be their target, they only came up with shit like the ps4 pro because people complained about resolution. Now they're complaining about framerate, so sony will find some meme framerate that they promise but can never achieve.

He's been shilling for Sony crazy hard lately. Think he' another irrelevant e-celeb trying to pander to sonnyggers.

try 2020 at the earliest

>sony literally said the PS4 is only halfway into its life
>great now i HAVE to get a PS5!!!!
kys

I remember when they sold the PS3 as a 1080p machine.

VR needs 60fps at minimum
120fps ideally

I remember when consoles were sold on the quality of the games and not how powerful the hardware was.

really? i don't.

>ps4 1080p 30
>ps5 1080p unstable 60
>ps6 2560 stable 60
>ps7 4k unstable 60
>ps8 4k stable 60
>ps9 4k stable 120
>ps10 4k stable 240

when was that?
must have been before the NES.

>read "according to analyst" in thumbnail
>"I bet it's Pachter"
>open image
>it's Pachter
lol

Have you played on 144 hz? Or 240? No I didn't think so

Protip: You can tell the difference

You know people used to argue about SNES and Genesis graphics

Literally underage
The power of hardware was always discussed and promoted

Anal liesing, get good at it

Go back to r3ddit, you won't get upv0tes for pretending to be smart and appealing to nostalgia here.

>Pachter

Someone post that one video about his knowledge in rts games.

Yeah, for blu ray movies

user youre the main reason we have console war threads. Fuck off.

>what is mode 7 and blast processing ?

>"60"=15-30
>"240"=60-120?

???

>60 fps
Yes please

Why don't they rerelease the PSX and PS2 library on PS4 or PC?

It's 70 minimum, but I saw people in demo booths hitting 45 on that climbing game.

They said that actually only a small part of the players want to play old shit

too lazy to write an emulator.

and the sony execs actually seem to think that people dont care about older games.

Profit is profit, they could overcharge by a mile.

So, why the fuck people still regard pachter as the market guru?

It was already posted

Yeah but i don't think they're entirely wrong like, how much people realy want old games? and i mean want as "going to pay for them" and not just "oh hey i remember that game nice" but don't proceed to get it

>240fps

Is...is this a joke? Most TVs can only show 60 FPS because of how they handle refresh rate. Please tell me this isn't a serious "analysis".

Pretty sure they just use Pachter as a click bait generator now.

Pachter literally said the same thing for the PS4 and XBONE. Just replace 4k with 1080p+. Honestly he's an analyst that does not understand how consoles, pcs or gaming in general works and that such a console even in 3-4 years would have a ridiculous price point, that no console manufacturer would be dumb enough to go after.
And does he even know that most monitors and especially TVs cap out at 60fps? You'll never see a console supporting more than 60fps if there is not a new standard for TVs, which will not magically happen, seeing how gaming at 60fps is more than fine and watching movies literally does not need more than 24fps or 48fps on the rare occasion.
He allways tells investors to go with microsoft, which by coincidence was the right choice last gen if you wanted to make money and not lose it, but that's about it.
He has claimed nintendo would leave the game industry soon.

He gets paid to say retarded shit, and websites get paid to write about the retarded shit he gets paid to say.

They don't

technically games can still run 240fps but only display at 60hz.
its been done on the wiiu.
ign.com/articles/2014/02/07/art-of-balance-announced-for-wii-u

lmao thats why the SNES mini sold out a minute after they put the preorders up.

This is like "that kid" writing an article

>Yeah but I know Sony is gonna release the Playstation SUPER and is turns at 16000k with 3000fps and it's gonna have a Mario game that has blood and gore and sex

Can HDMI even do 4k/240? The HDMI 2.1 specs say 4k/120Hz, I can't find any evidence of 240Hz. I doubt consoles would start using DisplayPort either. Maybe HDMI 2.2 will do it by 219/2020.

>And does he even know that most monitors and especially TVs cap out at 60fps?
A lot of mid range TV's are above 60hz now, not the 800hz meme shit the box says but still actually above 60hz

It sold out because Nintendodrones are manchildren