Dead Space

1 > 3 > 2

2>1>3
Alternatively,
2>3 CO-OP>1

what the fuck. I guess you appreciate sheer atmosphere of 1 and complete turnaround of the franchise towards action of 3, but I dont see how do you not place best of both (read 2) first

correct answer

Writing / atmosphere of 2 is shit, Isaac is annoying to listen to. The co op action of 3 is more fun and 1's atmosphere is best.

Bullshit. I was even fine with RE5 co-op. I loved it, in fact. Bought DS3 on opening night, me and my friend set up tvs in my apartment and played the entire game co-op. It's shit. It's not fun. Every room is the same. Co-op was bland. Story was bland.

It isn't a good TPS, and it certaintly wasn't a good sequel to 2.

ME and DS Series are literally the same, 1st is god tier, 2nd remains more of less the same but this time with higher budget to attract more normies, 3rd game is full blown hollywood dogshit

1>2>3

Anything else is wrong. People that prefer 2 over 1 are the type of people that prefer Aliens over the original.

>>
you are both wrong, its best in order of release

Oh cool, now we have people shilling DS3; a game that literally killed the franchise in unison agreement from fans and the company alike. Fuck off, retard contrarian. 2 > 1 > Wii game > 3

story in 2 is meh, but nothing insulting. atmosphere is completely fine, maybe a tiny bit worse than 1

Isaac's VA is GOAT and he only really talked in cutscenes and sometimes over the comm

DS3 DLC was pants on head retarded. What the fuck were they thinking

3 probably would have been my favorite if the whole game was like the ship graveyard space walk section

>atmosphere is completely fine
>Isaac goes from not talking to being a talkative retard
>first game is more interesting / authentic survival horror scenario
Far from fine

Series was already dying with 2

2 > 1 > every bad thing that has ever happened to a human or animal throughout history > 3

Is Dead Space 3 worth pirating or paying $5 for?

...

Only worth playing for the co-op.

Seriously, faggot? When did you enter the series? When 2 released everyone thought that they ruined Isaac. 1 easily has the better atmosphere.

2 was designed to show us how Issac would react DURING A FRESH OUTBREAK. So YES there will be more frantic actions and mannerisms from the characters involved.

Man that's depressing. I loved Mass Effect and Dead Space 1. each of the sequels were great but still not as good as the originals and the 3rd entries ruined each franchise for me.

I hate that they got rid of the rpg elements from ME1 to 2 (equipment and weapon mods/ammo types)

This doesn't make it good and definitely not better.

>Isaac's VA is GOAT
You fucking what. His VA was the shittest thing about DS2.

Pretty good analogy you have there. Makes me feel conflicted considering I like Alien and DS2 best. Probably since DS2 is an interactive media, the action is more enjoyable than the lulmarines of Aliens