I've noticed that the majority of bad press for Kingdom Come is coming from none other than the United States of...

I've noticed that the majority of bad press for Kingdom Come is coming from none other than the United States of America, the rest seem pretty content with it. What gives?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9vorbxST8SQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The game is not representative of the 56%.

you mean 44%?

americans don't like actual rpgs, they need some watered down stuff to be satisfied

How much did you get paid to shill this trash?

Americans tend to be more casual and less passionate about medieval European history.

shush there's no need to get upset sweetheart

It looks great. Just not convinced its worth 60 dollary doos.

Is it worth it now or should I at least wait for bug fixes?

Where would one even get an upset sweetheart and what the fuck does that have to do with anything?

It's fucking Americans trying to teach europeans about their history.

Americans want to play as White Europeans, forcing the player to play as slavs and germanics means they can't RP as a white to escape their mutt existence.

Wait for bug fixes

I've played it for 20 hours and came across a handful of minor bugs, nothing gamebreaking. Save system could use an improvement though.

Only americans care about race

>Germanics
>not white European

Fighting is clunky and difficult (if you like that sort of thing). It might send you a bit mad after awhile but if you like History, you'll cum.

>Game based on setting in mostly realistic medieval history.
>Well accepted in country with no real history.

You can choose only one.

By default, you should not trust a single American game publication. Ever.

just like the majority of shitposting

>no magic because muh realism
>get hit with bow and sword more than once
>don't get crippled or plain dead from a well placed bow
so this... is the power... of realism............

Wait for steep sale after a few patches.

>Wow this game is so realistic
>ups, just scratched myself on this tree, guess i'm gonna die now
>thats was fun

Git gud

If it's in the face I agree, but what I want to know, when shooting someone with armor, not necessary even plate, does using "Piercing Arrow" make a difference? I mean is hunting arrows meant for smaller animals even useful against leather/thick cloth combinations?

stop trying so hard its embarassing

>everyone who doesnt like this game isnt sjw sweetie
>everyone who like the game is shill, reeeeeeee

Americans are fat retards.

Did you really need to make this thread?

It's a standards thing.
North Americans don't eat boiled shoes, shit in the street, or drink piss like most Europeans, so they have slightly higher standards when it comes to media.
I, for one, don't really care for games where the combat is objective trash (like Kingdom Cuck).

Polygon isn't representative of America, fuck off retard.

If you wore quality 15th century plate armor you would be pretty much invincible against bows, hand held crossbows and even lances, unless you get lucky hit to unprotected/less protected part of body. Munitions grade armor wasnt that good, but it would laugh at hunting bows and crossbows all day every day. End of story.

youtube.com/watch?v=9vorbxST8SQ

It's more or less a Troika Games release but without the completely gamebreaking bugs, I only saw minor ones right now.

>smack a guy 15 times he dont die
>he hit u once
>ouch im dead

It depends on a ton of factors. The answer is high-release arablasts with a hardened bolt would penetrate without issue from a good distance.

The US has more niggers

Absolutely not if we are talking about plate armor. Also penetrating armor doesnt mean defeating armor. First, bolts designed to penetrate plate armor had inherently lower wounding potential and neither were very effective against second layer of defence which was more susceptible to cutting than to piercing. Second, if bolt penetrated both, it rarely had enough energy to hit deep enough to some vital part of the body. And third, even if it had and did hit vital area, death or incapacitation wouldnt happen instantly, but it would take minutes to tens of minutes (or even hours), while target would be still capable of fighting because under effect of adrenaline.

Anyway, any hunting bows/crossbows were laughably weak against any armor widely used in 15th century, because they werent designed to defeat armor at all. And humans are much harder to kill than holywood movies make you think, especially with such primitive weapons as in question.

Confirmation bias. Apparently some German gaming magazine had to issue an apology for giving the game good press after a bunch of people complained about how the game dev's are racist.

America didn't exist before 1700 and therefore had no middle ages. nor ancient history
It's difficult for them to imagine a world with swords and without guns

And without niggers.

You didn't notice shit OP, people from around the world can notice the games a sluggish piece of shit, deal with it.

>America.... had no Middle Ages

You will summon aztecbro and be punished with huge text dumps.