Holy fucking based

Holy fucking based

I guess i'm renewing my plus membership for the year

>Pay to play online

i only see rime and knack. does it update later today or something?

>doesn't already have bloodborne

Next week. Games are changed every first Tuesday of the month I think.

This. Don't PS+ titles swap every month? Bloodborne requires months to fully enjoy; only Ratchet & Clank are worth playing for free

You have one month to download the games, not to play. Once it's in your library it's yours forever (as long as you have a ps+ subscription)

You get to keep the game, dumb ass. It's not just free for the month.

>Update: A representative for Sony told Polygon that after February 2019, the monthly PlayStation Plus lineups will consist only of two free PS4 games. We’ve edited the article to reflect this.
Fuck Sony and their shit "services".

Why haven't you already got the only exclusive on your console already?

P5, Yakuza, Gravity Rush and Digimon say hi. Enjoy playing poorly optimized PS4 ports after they've already been out for a while. I'll be enjoying exclusives plus all the best multiplats first.

>year
fuck off

why would you own a ps4 and not own its one exclusive??
also R&C is fucking ass, go play the original

sony can't get any more based than this, the only people upset by this are nintensoys

sour
grapes.

the game is $20 dumb ass.

What the fuck? Not that guy but he's right. Who owns a PS4 and doesn't already own it's best exclusive. I also happen to own ratchet and clank and it isn't particularly good, this month sucks shit.

Holy shit.
>have to keep paying for Plus to play your old "free" PS3 and Vita games
>don't even get more PS4 games
>will probably switch back to indieshit before long

Both are pretty fun games. Enjoy it bud.

not OP but you don't get access to the games if at any point you don't have PlayStation Plus. Bloodborne going free means that the PvP scene is going to blow up again. There's really no reason to not get it for the year. They 100% should not take the games away from people without PlayStation Plus though.

Why are they cutting off the ps3 and vita games now? Will they replace that content with something else?

They aren't even upping the number of ps4 games you get each month after cutting the vita and ps3 games, is that fair? Even after raising the price of ps+ last year and after seeing this cut content, is it even justified to do this? Why are people not more angry about this?

Meanwhile, Xbox Gold actually lets you play your "free" games regardless of your subscription. At least, that's been my experience - I've only downloaded 360 games.

Game Pass, however, is kike central.

>sour grapes for those two games you own and have completed
believe it or not you can in fact own a product and still not fucking adore it

People are used to taking it up the ass from Sony.

If they keep raising the quality of PS4 free titles, it'll still be worth it. There was a time last year where it was pathetic, then we got Just Cause 3, MGS V, Knack, Deus Ex Mankind Divided and now R&C / Bloodborne, so they're upping their game.

Getting 6 games only for four of them to be literal shovelware like Type: Rider or those $1.99 games wasn't good.

The only way they can redeem this choice is if they we get way higher quality ps4 plus games. I doubt it, which makes this a big loss

bet you think knack are good games as well you cum guzzling drone

>have ps4
>hate souls shit
>played bb for 3 hours and was still bored
I legitimately will never understand the meme love for this ip.

Don't talk shit about Knack, faggot

They just remove access while not subbed, they don't remove the game forever.

>why are they cutting support for the console that will be 14 years old in 2019 and for the handheld that will be 7 years old and focus the Plus budget on better PS4 games which was the number one demand of the majority of PS+ owners

I'd like them to continue offering those too, but c'mon.

give a few years and it wont even give "free" games at all

It's ok, some people just can't enjoy good things. Don't be ashamed, user.

Xbox gold has a lot of catching up do to to PS+. Sony was going to run out of shit to offer for PS3 given how long the service has been running.

I really feel like that's the case. It's okay when sony does it raising the price of ps+ and even requiring to pay to play your games online.

I remember the E3 when they announced you'd have to pay to play online and nobody felt the fucking need to question it or oppose it. It's ridiculous, also when Nintendo tries to charge for online people get up in arms about that.

>comunnity isn't dead
PCfaggots need to die

>having a plebstation 4

This. Who the fuck owns a PS4 and doesn't buy the best game for it? I'll take R&C free tho.
Rime was fucking ass, I couldn't finish that boring shit game.

Where were you? I remember Sup Forums losing their shit because online wasnt going to be free

Why don't you just buy both of those games for $30? Enjoy your 11 months of disappointment.

how do they keep getting away with this
people are so fucking dumb

I would be cheaper to just buy the games

Then why the fuck are they putting so much money into PS Now for those old games? You make no fucking sense. How could you defend a company that's taking content away from you?

Fair point I guess but I'd still just buy the game and get a month here and there when you feel like some pvp.

The problem is that its cyclical. When PSplus first launched way back before even the PS4 there were some really good fucking games on it. Cloud storage was great but the reason I was an early adopter is because of the game quality. Then it turned to indie shit and now we're getting decent games again. No reason to believe they won't go back to indieshit when it's convenient.

Just buy bloodborne digitally Thats cheaper then ps+

are you retarded? It doesn't only let you play for a month, it lets you download it for a month and is available at all times throughout the subscription.

But then you'll want the PS+ for some co-op action, especially during a month where the game's free so new people are playing it.
SONY ALWAYS WINS BABY

No one actually buys it for the games. So the normalfags irl clearly buy it just for multilayer.

I mean the big sites like IGN or Gamespot, etc, who had no issue with it and practically said it was NEEDED and that it should happen. They are definitely on Sony's payroll when displaying favorable news about their platform.

I wonder if the tards who are complaining about no more ps3/vita games even play or care about those systems anymore

This. I think it took a while for the good games to come out and lower in price, but no we're here to see proper quality games be released to the service.

I already have bloodborne, but I've never played a R&C title before so I'm kinda hype about this.

>No one actually buys it for the games
People who play Japanese games (read: people who actually play video games and not broken piles of shit with sex mods) buy them because PS4 is the only platform that all the current good games save the odd Nintendo exclusive come out on,

its a shame because early ps plus was actually a fucking cracking deal
tons of good games, was well worth the sub cost
now they just lock online behind and no doubt the only reason they keep the "free" games is so they can get free publicity from sites every month

>They just remove access while not subbed, they don't remove the game forever.

Yeah, meaning you have to keep paying money for the games you already paid for. I don't know if MS copied their model or not, but they used to let you keep the games regardless of your subbed status. This was a much better model IMO. I know its a long way off, but eventually the service will shut down and then all those games will be gone with it.

They have a monthly budget for PS+ games each month. Nowadays, they have to spread the budget to get 2 PS4 games, 2 PS3 games and 2 Vita games. They don't want to repeat titles already offered, and the PS3 service has been running for close to a decade, if not more. The Vita has been getting games since its birth. They've given a lot of games for those already and the number one complaint is that PS4 doesn't get good games. They've chosen to focus on PS4 because most people today want better 'free' PS4 games. In 2019, all the budget will go towards 2 PS4 games.

I'm talking about ps+. Almost everyone buys it just for multiplayer. This is the reason the game quality dropped for the ps4 compared to ps3 ps plus

XBLG only works like that for 360 games. Xbone is the same as PS4. And don't forget how recent games with gold is compared to ps+.

Both companies half ass this shit in different ways

MS only lets you keep the X360 games given with that GMG initiative, you require Gold membership to play the Xbox One titles, like PS+.

>Mods
Sure faggot, the community is dead

I think it's worth sixty bucks a year so I can play vidya with you guys.
I love you guys.

Holy shit, I just realized they might actually give away Street Fighter V. PLEASE Sony.

Bullshit that they completely restrict access after you stop subscribing. On the store it says "this price is only available until (date)... Once you download this game, it will be accessible in your library" or something, which leads the customer to believe they own the game. Absolute Jew shit that they require you to subscribe to play "your" "free" "games".

>>doesn't already have bloodborne and Ratchet & Clank
Lol what did you buy the PS4 for then?

For Vita and PS3 games you didn't have to be subscribed to be able to keep on playing them.

Do you think they're actually doing this to get ready for the PS5 and it's launch sometime next year? Also, do you think it's possible they'll tease or announce the ps5 this E3?

Considering Capcom's model for SF V, I wouldn't be surprised if they put it as a PS+ title. Most of the money they make today with that game comes from costumes, characters and stages, which are bought as DLC. It's essentially a GAAS title, so it would benefit from the injection of new players, like Rocket League did at launch.

Not me, ignore this shit poster.

Well I was on my favorite website, www.Reddit.com (with BLACKED in the next window for maximum fapping experience XD).

Eat a dick Tom you faggot cat you aren't my friend

Gravity Rush 2, Street fighter 5, Horizon Zero Dawn, Last of us 2, Uncharted 4, New GOW, Yakuza 0. The list goes on.

>not owning BB
Sounds unreal.

Exactly. I already have the game but I see it on sale for dirt cheap all of the time. A lot of people are still reluctant to buy it but I'm sure if it was PS+ they'd just download it to give it a try. That might be a good boost for the playerbase.

To add to this, I own Bloodborne but I haven't opened it and I was planning to return it to get the complete edition. I still want to do this because I want to actually own the game, am I autistic or is this actually justified?

I think they're paving the way to the PS5's announcement, but the PS4 library is still going strong and we have some key titles still in the oven (God of War in April, Detroit in May, Spider-Man second half of 2018, Days Gone Q4 2018, The Last of Us 2 in 2019).

I think they'll only talk about PS5 after 2019, but yeah, they're probably already starting to shift the PS4 to assume the position of the PS3.

Now believe it or not anons, not everyone thinks souls games are the fucking tip top! I LOVED bloodborne myself but stop acting like retards on purpose.

>but who doesn-

MOST OF THE PS4 USERBASE.

I enjoyed last month giving me Grand Kingdom more. Fucking hell that made me happy.

Are you actually shilling a David cage movie?

>used to offer games for PS3, Vita and PS4 every month
>now only PS4
>price stays the same
fucking sony
i'm not even paying for it and i'm still mad

What kind of twisted way of thinking do you have to have to read that post and come up with that as your conclusion?

That's not until next year, user.

And they haven't said if they'll offer more PS4 games to compensate.

You must download the game onto your actual hardware. If it's only in your library, you have to have the active subscription to get access to it at (mostly) any time. PS4's work offline so unless the game itself explicitly requires a login, you can play whatever you have on disc or downloaded.
Get the BB complete edition, the DLC is some of the best content in the game and it's big.

If it's as enjoyable as Until Dawn I have nothing against it

Ah shitty they changed it for Xbone, that was a much better system.

>X amount of money to get 2 PS4 games, 2 PS3 games and 2 PS Vita games
>Now X amount of money is to get 2 PS4 games

It could mean better PS4 titles being offered for PS+ subscribers every month, we'll know in 2019.

>PS+ originally was all about just getting games and was completely optional
>Sony changes it so that it's mandatory to have the sub to play online
>drones think they're getting the games now for free as an added bonus

BASED SONY

Replace x with free cuz everyone knows the ps+ xploit right?

>Want to buy Monster Hunter
>Don't want to wait for the PC version
>Don't want to pay for online

oh shit THE GOYIM KNOW

So I can download only when I'm subscribed but I can play my downloades games any time I want? That's more acceptable if true. Or do I have to wrap my PS4 in tinfoil and disconnect it from the internet so it doesn't go online to request my subscription info every time I start the game?

It's really fucking fun.

Use the exploit them faggot poorfag

>free

PS+ games require periodic online verification. You can be locked out of your games if you haven't turned your on console in ages and find yourself in an area without internet even with an active sub, as I found out during a recent trip with my Vita.

This happens even with your steam library.

>Swaps all the good games with indies and shovelware
Delightfully devilish, Sony.

>PSN introduced
>"nah bro, look at all the games they give and it's cheaper than Xbox live!"
>They make it mandatory for online
>"H-ha, paid online is good now! It's ok if sony does it! It's still cheaper"
>They raise the price
>"J-Just a few dollars more user, are you poor? lmao"
>Less games now, only PS4 titles
>Keep paying for it thinking it's some great deal while Sony slowly removes more and more of the service as they know now that idiots will just keep paying

In don't remember gwg every working like that for xbone.

they have to pay publishers to give away games on PS+, why waste money when PS3 is at the end of its life worldwide and the vita is thoroughly dead outside asia?
i wonder why japan doesn't keep giving away vita games though, is PS+ less popular there?

I mean changed compared to the 360.

Ninth nw system get you games for free and its only 20$ ty for bettesting faggot

No, I mean that Sony has a budget to get games every month for PS+.

But gold was actually worth it unlike plus