Game 1 is a fantastic masterpiece, completly changing the video game industry

>Game 1 is a fantastic masterpiece, completly changing the video game industry

>Game 2 tries to mimic the same success as game 1 but at the same time trying to make drasticaly changes wich only results in a total mess of a game

>Game 3 tries once again to mimic the success of game 1 but this time it literally copy and paste the same tropes and game mechanics of game 1, also the plot of game 3 relies in nostalgia in order to appeal to the fanbase wich makes game 3 superior to game 2 but inferior to game 1

>haha look guys i just made a dark souls thread while posting a pepe frog please reply to my thread

Cool now lets circle arguement about the bad hitboxes in 2, the swamps in 3 and how dark souls one is an unflawed masterpiece that does nothing wrong what so ever

>Game 1 is a fantastic masterpiece, completly changing the video game industry

>Game 1 is an amazing game that is everything you could ask for
>Game 2 goes in a different direction
>Game 2 gets more popular than 1 by luck
>Every new game in the series plays like game 2 instead of game 1

It all comes crashing down after Game 3

what is resident evil

>Game 1 is good
>Game 2 is alright
>Game 3 is shit
>Somehow 2 and 3 are loved more than 1 by most people.

the witcher?

you are part of the problem

I wasnt the one who managed to make an even worse skyrim with TW3

Nigga talking about xenoblade

Dark Souls?

>Game 1 revolutionizes gameplay I'm a way that every future game will copy
>Game 2 has just as good of gameplay but a less intetesting atmosphere
>Game 3 is finished by a different studio and changes core mechanics but still decent

>Game 4 is a modern day reboot that copies mechanics from other games that were themselves trying to copy the first two games and becomes a generic mess.

xenoblades combat is the best of any other xeno game only problem is auto attacks are disabled during movement

>3 is worse than 2
Nope.

>Game 1 is a good foundation

>Game 2 tries to do lots of new things, although it's sloppy and unrefined

>Game 3 takes all those new ideas and concepts and streamlines them perfectly into a masterpiece

name that franchise

DS1 had the atmosphere and charm
DS2 had combat
DS3 tried all of that, failed all of that

Super Mario

Warcraft?

DMC

>DS2 had combat
fucking hate this meme

ding ding ding

Dead Rising

clearly Gears of War

Halo

Thanks for the reminder that I am still mad about mass effect 2 and 3

name 14 games that do

Was just going to say this. Fuck Mass Effect for introducing a cool world and then running it into the ground and turning into a shitty third person shooter.

>Game 3 tries once again to mimic the success of game 1 but this time it literally copy and paste the same tropes and game mechanics of game 1
the only "game mechanic" dark souls 3 copied from 1 is most of the weapon movesets, what the fuck are you talking about?

It's literally the same game with slightly faster movement and worse design all around. It's a pathetic shell of a game. It has nothing to call its own and is a purely derivative experience.

>game 1 is a wacky fantasy platforms adventure
>game 2 is a grimdark sci-Fantasy Grand Theft Auto clone
>Game 3 Is A Wasteland racer with elements of the first two sprinkled in

Dark Souls

>no interconnected world design and bonfire warp from the start, like ds2
>no 25%/50%/75% equip load roll distinction, only 70% which was copied from ds2
>visceral attacks like bloodborne
>no poise at all, just like ds2/bb
>bosses have second phases
>no humanity mechanic
>has the exact same stats as demon's souls
>much more action oriented overall
>purple phantoms

wanna keep telling me how it's the exact same thing as dark souls 1?

Sonic 1-3