Thinking of giving Linux a try. Should I go for Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, or something else?

Thinking of giving Linux a try. Should I go for Ubuntu, Debian, Arch, or something else?

Other urls found in this thread:

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorfahrt?wprov=sfla1
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

...

2, 3, 1 (America)

Try OpenSUSE instead

this

Xubuntu. Ubuntu is full of spyware.

Big car goes first.
Then small cars will have to fight for their right to pass first

Slackware.

If you want to keep your gaymes, Ubuntu with playonlinux installed.

1 goes before 3

Yield sign takes precedence over non-yield sign

What sign is that next to 2?

I'll save some time for you:
Don't.

Depends. If you want a Unix experience, try Slackware, or Minix, or FreeBSD.
If you want Windows for 0 USD, try Ubuntu and then install KDE on top of it.

3 will already be going before 2 finished passing, 1 has no chance

>try Ubuntu and then install KDE on top of it

...or just install Kubuntu.

You're a fucking idiot

Why does 2 have a triangular "no littering" sign
Or is that a "Warning: litter" sign?

shitty/old PC: Xubuntu

i3 or better Desktop: Ubuntu GNOME, Kubuntu, Mint

i3 or better Laptop: Fedora

This in britain as well. Larger road to smaller road has priority.

2 3 1

Arch if you want to be one of us.

I'd just sit there and wait it out till they go the fuck away.

I'm an American, I don't need math-think on my roads.

Why is everyone on the wrong side of the road?

Anyway, 2, 3, 1. Though I don't know what that triangular sign next to 2 is.

I have KDE on mint and I don't get it. Why is this so great again? Isn't this just regular mint with really choppy animations on everything?

3 1 2

Pretty much all of my needs are fulfilled by xubuntu. If it's lighterweight, then why use anything else?

learn2perspective

Depends which car I'm in.

3

231

3 > 2 > 1

All of them should go at the same time (India).

if you are tech savy, debian, otherwise ubuntu.

2 goes first, main road and not turning
3 goes second, main road but he is turning, to the left on top of that
1 goes last, he is on a secondary road

Yep.
Reasoning
2: is traveling straight on a 2 lane road and much faster than the other 2, the other 2 are stopped.
3: is stopped in the middle of the road blocking traffic behind them, and is also on the main road.
1 Is stopped and waiting to join the main road.
> I don't even drive.

3 has no yield sign you cockmangonel.
ergo they have no duty to yield per the law.

Also 1 is a faggot because he's not using his turn signal.. asshole.

I think it's 3, 2, 1, but what sign is that next to #2? And either way, what fucked up city planner make this intersection? Why not just a stop sign?

internation convention,
triangles = warning
circles = mandatory

"I'm faster so they have to stop" is terrible logic to drive by.

3 2 1

Are you dumb?
"I'm stopped and want to turn across the lane of this moving car, better turn and make them slam on their brakes."

No, they're naturally traveling faster meaning if one turned in-front of them they would probably crash right into them even with anti lock breaks.

I never implied 2 shouldn't go first, I pointed out that "2 going faster" is terrible reason. If you don't want to crash you always go by the local traffic rules, even when it's inefficient, even when you have to stop when "going faster".

it looks vaguely like a hand, suggesting a stop sign, but that's not how stop signs look. it's not how any street signs look in the US.

This, even in Europe.

Anyone legit not following by 2 3 1.
Please get the fuck off the road. Destroy your permit/license and kys my dudes.

Australia

...

why do Americans make everything so complicated?

>is traveling straight on a 2 lane road and much faster

The reason why we set the rule system like this is actually because they are [naturally] traveling at higher speeds, I'm not sure you quite get what was being said.
I'm not saying more gas = right of way so gun it threw an intersection.

correct order is,
muricans
niggers
mexicans

Entry point top left, whole thing falls apart again.

Somethings fishy...
If that was the UK it'd be a roundabout instead, if it was Japan it'd be trains instead, if it was Australia where are the sleeping Abos?

what's the correct order here?

Same in Sweden(EU)

I really hope you don't have a driver's license

I do, and that sign isn't even in my state's driving handbook.

Fun fact: these appeared for the first time in London's Indian immigrant neiboughoods

Latest road in London

If you're driving on the right, then the person on the left has the right of way. Therefore, 2 goes first, then 1, then 3.

If you're driving on the left then the person on the right has the right of way. So 3 goes first, then 1, then 2.

Source: I own a driving license in a country where you drive on the left and in a country where you drive on the right.

Are you people retarded? It's 3, 1, 2. Just apply the clockwise rule at these problems, and the rightmost one goes first.

If it was just 2 and 3, the one going right is the first.

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorfahrt?wprov=sfla1

That means that you are allowed to drive First

If it is a 3-way stop I think you are right

>clockwise rule
Are you retarded?

Way to overcomplicate it. Yes it is 3, 1, 2 but it is as simple as the car(s) going straight always has priority, then the car(s) turning off the road, then the car(s) turning onto the road.

Are you retarded? The signs indicate that the main road has priority and that the side road has to yield.

2, 3, 1 Portugal

Same in germany I think. But I am not sure. I would just drive straight on.

>Yes it is 3, 1, 2 but it is as simple

Excuse me, but are you blind?

2, 3, 1, because:
>2 is going straight (highest priority)
>3 AND 1 are making left turns, BUT 1 has a yield AND is coming to a T

good starter distros
- ubuntu (easy to use)
- linux mint (familiar for windows users)
- xubuntu (familiar for windows users, lightweight)
- PClinuxOS (customizable, 'rolling release' [newer software, less stable])
- kubuntu (customizable, fixed release [older software, more stable])

ignore these suggestions
- debian (intermediate)
- arch (hard [but highly educational])
- gentoo (expert)
- fedora (avoid the gnome 3 desktop environment when starting out)
- slackware (expert)
- elementary (unless you've only used OSX)

As soon as you stop you forfeit your right of way Probably would be 2 first and then the other two would have to find a solution for themselves.

2>3>1

Arch or a -buntu in a VM because you probably won't like it

i dont know i only drive in rural lithuania with traktoras everyone

What traktora? Belarus?

i am driving the uaz 469 of my uncle

Gentoo

OP here

>all these autists replying seriously
lol I just wanted an excuse to post that image. I use FreeBSD anyway. Fuck linux

Seconding.

This is one of the funniest images I've ever seen.

You're right, but for the completely wrong reasons
2 goes first due to the priority sign (it indicates that the road he's on takes priority over the other one instead of the default priority from the right).
Since 3 crosses the opposite lane to turn, he has to yield to 2, but maintains priority over 1.
The upside down triangle for 1 indicates that he has to give priority to all other traffic and thus goes last.

Thirding.

Let this be a lesson to you to never post a image more interesting than your comment.

I assumed it was one of these but I'm not sure why it's in a red triangle.

>I'm not sure why it's in a red triangle.

Because that picture is from Britain where red triangles are used to warn of potential hazards.

...

Oh, right on. So 3 definitely doesn't stop there, and mostly everyone was right about the order.

If you want things to justwerk, pick Arch (or the others you listed to a greater degree). If you want a challenge, pick gentoo or a bsd.

Arch is seriously not that hard. The installation is literally "partition disk, make fstab, chroot, download shit from internet to disk using one command, boot into installed loonix".

To be honest, if you want to buy into Sup Forums's minimalism meme, you'll want something like gentoo. Arch installation just batch downloads piles of shit you don't need, and your kernel is bloat as fuck.

i should note that you don't even need to make the fstab yourself because they make a babby's-first-loonox-tier script to do it for you. And they added in a script to automatically do everything you need to do when chrooting. It's childsplay.

...

was for myself at Sorry

it indicates which way is the main road
>pic literally related

Correct

I also thought this and I don't even drive

Germany, confirm

>not using Linux from scratch

can confirm, am Australian

...

Italy, confirm.

all at once
just be careful