>2016
>Sup Forums still uses ext4
You have 10 seconds to explain why you are not using superior XFS.
Also, /filesystem thread/. Post your $ inxi -P
>2016
>Sup Forums still uses ext4
You have 10 seconds to explain why you are not using superior XFS.
Also, /filesystem thread/. Post your $ inxi -P
Other urls found in this thread:
events.linuxfoundation.org
twitter.com
>Not using f2fs
>>Sup Forums still uses ext4
But I am using ParagonFS.
>not using an old version of btrfs and running a balance and inadvertently destroying your data
>tfw using NTFS
it just werks
Enjoy your fragmentation.
jokes on you. I'm using SSD
Enjoy your extra write load leading to faster NAND wear.
>2016
>not using zfs or exfat master race
b t r f s
t r f s
r f s
f s
s
I supercharged my pc by windows 8.1 pro with bullshit updates uninstalled and disabled
+ tweaked stuff for speed
+ disabled hot corners
+ added start button.
There is no reason in years now to use any other OS for me. This works great.
>tfw no zfs on OS X
/thread
what's wrong with ext4?
fuck off tripfag cancer
Literally nothing. It's a stopgap until btrfs or xfs.
>events.linuxfoundation.org
>Ext4 2h
>Xfs 1h45m
>Hfsplus 25s (twenty-five seconds)
zfs.
can i turbocharge my pc?
You need a real filesystem with Arch. Running btrfs with Arch is plain too memey. Some of us psuedo-neets can't risk melting our data every week
But OP, I am using XFS. :) with ext2 on /boot
I'm using BTRFS at the moment. Convince me to switch.
>ext2
Why?
CentOS default is XFS so obviously have XFS
namefag*
not him but I always did ext2 with boot as well. i was told i was told. never had issue either
Reliability?
Haven't lost any data in 2 years I've used it. It's reliable enough for me.
Idk what the fucking difference between them all is desu senpai, I just use ext4 like I was recommended
only think i don't like about XFS is that volumes can't be shrunk
why does it matter?
>XFS
>Not ReFS
>REFER