2016

>2016
>Sup Forums still uses ext4

You have 10 seconds to explain why you are not using superior XFS.

Also, /filesystem thread/. Post your $ inxi -P

Other urls found in this thread:

events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL filesystem fuzzing, Vault 2016_0.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Not using f2fs

>>Sup Forums still uses ext4
But I am using ParagonFS.

>not using an old version of btrfs and running a balance and inadvertently destroying your data

>tfw using NTFS

it just werks

Enjoy your fragmentation.

jokes on you. I'm using SSD

Enjoy your extra write load leading to faster NAND wear.

>2016
>not using zfs or exfat master race

b t r f s
t r f s
r f s
f s
s

I supercharged my pc by windows 8.1 pro with bullshit updates uninstalled and disabled
+ tweaked stuff for speed
+ disabled hot corners
+ added start button.

There is no reason in years now to use any other OS for me. This works great.

>tfw no zfs on OS X

/thread

what's wrong with ext4?

fuck off tripfag cancer

Literally nothing. It's a stopgap until btrfs or xfs.


>events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL filesystem fuzzing, Vault 2016_0.pdf
>Ext4 2h
>Xfs 1h45m
>Hfsplus 25s (twenty-five seconds)

zfs.

can i turbocharge my pc?

You need a real filesystem with Arch. Running btrfs with Arch is plain too memey. Some of us psuedo-neets can't risk melting our data every week

But OP, I am using XFS. :) with ext2 on /boot

I'm using BTRFS at the moment. Convince me to switch.

>ext2
Why?

CentOS default is XFS so obviously have XFS

namefag*

not him but I always did ext2 with boot as well. i was told i was told. never had issue either

Reliability?

Haven't lost any data in 2 years I've used it. It's reliable enough for me.

Idk what the fucking difference between them all is desu senpai, I just use ext4 like I was recommended

only think i don't like about XFS is that volumes can't be shrunk

why does it matter?

>XFS
>Not ReFS

>REFER