Why is he worth 100 million times more than Stallman, but looks 100 million times worse?

Why is he worth 100 million times more than Stallman, but looks 100 million times worse?

Attractiveness is inversely proportional to wealth in STEM.

Because he actually inspired important people.

Stallman inspires people to stay home and commit suicide.

Stallman might be an autist but he did a lot for software.

Because he gets shit done

He cloned existing ideas. He was a shitty Steve Jobs.

>implying woz didnt practically invent computers

Stallman is the real Steve Jobs.

He didn't copy a single line of code. He also invented the idea of FOSS software, which gave birth to lots of awesome projects, which without open source collaboration wouldn't even exist. He is the reason that we don't have microshit and crapple corporate botnet oligopoly.
Alan Turing did. Woz was just lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time. In the same way you can claim that mene Jobs invented computers.

ITT: Shitty NEET dropouts shitting on an intelligent, successful engineer who is slimmer than they are.

Fucking sage.

Nobody is shitting on him. He worked for his millions and deserved them. Good for him. But Stallman deserves at least equal amount of recognition

>But Stallman deserves at least equal amount of recognition

No he doesn't. He doesn't even maintain GNU anymore.

Because unlike stallman, he doesn't have crippling autism which allows him to market his software and make money off of it.

Irrelevant.

How in the fuck does Woz look worse than Stallman?

>He is the reason that we don't have microshit and crapple corporate botnet oligopoly.

lol those companies hold 99.5% of the marketshare
thanks RMS!

Only on desktop market. The rest is dominated by open source software. Even on desktop market, 5% is good enough to have superior software.

His whole post was ironic. The only thing a sysV clone did was kill sysV Unix.

>lol those companies hold 99.5% of the marketshare
>thanks RMS!

So open source software has like 0,5% marketshare?
You must be a really smart guy

Isn't Stallman the more recognizable face of the bunch? At least for me, I've extremely rarely seen Wozniak on the media where as Stallman I've seen mentioned even in the news.

He does cameos on par with a fusion of buzz spaceman and marvel old guy. He was on the big bang theory for fucks sake

Yeah because Woz is too busy spending his millions while Stallman is fighting for his ideas.

While working (starting in 1975) as a research assistant at MIT under Gerry Sussman,[11] Stallman published a paper (with Sussman) in 1977 on an AI truth maintenance system, called dependency-directed backtracking.[15] This paper was an early work on the problem of intelligent backtracking in constraint satisfaction problems. As of 2009, the technique Stallman and Sussman introduced is still the most general and powerful form of intelligent backtracking.[16] The technique of constraint recording, wherein partial results of a search are recorded for later reuse, was also introduced in this paper.

Many university professors during his university days said he was the best mind. well versed in many areas, such as biology, etc.

and you fuckers whine that he didn't sell himself for big profits. and you all love capitalism even though you don;t know a damn thing about it. because playing it safe and not being picked upon by conservative and critical media/real world people would be too much for your weak self-esteem. if not so, then you're indoctrinated by that college degree which teaches nothing of value. most of you would be better of stuffed in a museum for future generations to marvel over such backward AMerican ideas.

oh and by the way, FUCK WOZZie or whatever that LARD ASS likes to nick his fucking self. HE NEEDS A FUCKING APPLE. gas fat people

We live among retards where jewgle and microshit are the good people because they provide free stuff