Daily reminder that the s-expression is still the ideal way to represent data and code (which are the same thing anyway)
Daily reminder that the s-expression is still the ideal way to represent data and code (which are the same thing anyway)
>oh-look-this-thread-again.avi.exe
(define OP "faggot")
Nobody was able to prove me wrong last time.
(equal? OP "faggot")
#t
It's called multithreading.
Is this the RPN of the programming world?
lisp is the programming fedora
...
Daily reminder that parsing s-expressions is inherently difficult for the human brain due to lack of differentiated syntax.
Only for human growing up in Latin languages.
>implying infix is easy to read and write
Lisp has perfect syntax.
>t. someone who hasn't written a single line of code in lisp
you don't have to own a fedora to know what a loser you would be for owning one.
>perfect
>significant space
pick one
underrated post
If S-expressions are so perfect, why do you shitcorn fucks feel the need to decorate them and pile syntactic sugar on top of them that destroys their ``purity''?
I did the first chapters of SICP and it truly is the coding fedora.
>In this moment I am euphoric. Not because of any phony language's practical applications. But because, I am enlightened by my intelligence
That would be Forth and other Postfix languages.
I actually like S-expr/Lisp-y syntax. I find it really easy to read because everything is COMPLETELY unambiguous.
>latinos
>human
Pick one.
What language do you use where whitespace isn't significant anywhere?
>not using a language where whitespace is the only significant thing
Shiggy.