>Make a thread about games on Linux
>no replies
We have a quake clone guys,it's fun!
Why is Linux so irrelevant in the personal PC space? We'd have to force school children and business suits to drink this shit in order for people to even use it at home or at least pray for MS to fuck everyone soooooo hard that everyone switches in mass.
Other urls found in this thread:
store.steampowered.com
thepiratebay
wiki.debian.org
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
Muh gaems work just fine on Linux. Not sure What you're on about.
How does Microsoft do it?How does apple do it?Is it because there's too many diistros and people go so nuts with choice that it works against the OS growing support for the personal space?Is it that that the terminal is probably the one of the biggest reasons no one wants to mess with the OS because of how important it is with being about to break something so easily?The GUI(s)?
Now if only Rito had a actually client for linux,how many Google search results did it take to install and get the to run well?
If you didn't need to create a different package for every different distro out there, AND test it, things would be much smoother in Linux land.
No software developer wants to spend so much effort for sub 1% marketshare gains lads.
>starting scuttler
wut
is this a ting with kindred?
I don't remember but Playonlinux actually provides the installation scripts and patches that you can copy to make it working properly.
Not really unless it's marked by the passive. Since it's a bot game it doesn't really matter though.
It's simple... Linux forces use of the command line.
And secondly software isn't retard easy to install.
And lastly the GNU part of the Linux community is absolutely toxic.
And with that normal users stay the fuck away.
Pretty much this.
The freetards think that people on Windows/OSX are too retarded to use Linux when in reality are put off by all the autismo.
Kinda like DOS before the GUI?
this user gets it. people just want results from their devices.
AKA it just werks
if they have to go though extra trouble for a simple result then its wasting time they could be doing other shit...masturbating perhaps? shitposting on Sup Forums? whatever really.
The point is the end user doesnt give a shit about how the damn thing is supposed to work or even if it works well...they care about getting from a to b with as little fuss as possible.
People really truly do WANT linux...hell they want anything but windows. people fucking hate microsoft, but nothing has been released with the same level of ease. its a clusterfuck of complication.
yeah DOS sucked too...i remember how buggy windows 3x was...and we didnt care because at least it wasnt DOS and the command line.
Eh.... Your first two points (forces command line, software isn't retard easy to install) aren't true for *buntu derivatives.
I used DOS up until Windows 95, quite happily.
yes...yes they are man. compared to windows OSX and android.
and part of it is because of the forking of linux. this isnt the case wth windows and OSX.
look if there was a good easy alternative to windows the general population wouldve switched forever ago. I'd personaly pay damn good money for such a thing.
Have you tried ubuntu (or any of its flavors, or Mint), user? There is quite literally no need to use the terminal if you don't want to. You can accomplish everything through a GUI. And software can be installed through their 'software centers' which are basically app-stores.
No installing shit still fucking sucks on Ubuntu. When I learned Android for the first time, took 2 mins to learn how to download and install shit. I still don't know what the fuck all the goobly gooks terms and shit mean for Ubuntu after trying to research many times to sort it out.
linux developers prefer to build tools for productive people, that is, no gamers
store.steampowered.com
knock yourself out
>xcom
>$30
dude what year is it
Confirmed
It's literally sudo apt-get install program-name, or just use the gui.
And if you think the linux community is toxic, you haven't dealt with the windows community much.
>Linux forces use of the command line.
Not true.
>And secondly software isn't retard easy to install.
This is true.
We do have a bunch of games, just check the Steam catalog.
That's not League of Legends, so it doesn't matter.
Windows is a fucking cluster fuck.
It's all baby duck syndrome, and preinstalled.
You give someone a ubuntu install, preinstalled like windows, with and tell them to click the chrome icon, and they won't even notice it's not windows.
Except they won't get a shit ton of malware.
And that's why chromebooks are doing well.
A-Are you running you logged in as root?
Is an install button too complicated for you?
since 2000
>You give someone a ubuntu install, preinstalled like windows, with and tell them to click the chrome icon, and they won't even notice it's not windows.
open chrome to immediately download firefox.exe
it doesn't run
I'd notice
Can't even browse the web on Linux because their latest version of flash is 4 fucking years old.
Retard.
It's up to date on Chrome
download software from a website. why would I know what the the fuck a YUM.TAR.GZ.APT file is.
steam has lots of games FOR Linux, Linux itself has few.
You should know what an "install button" does.
Fuck, on Windows you have to download install buttons from different websites. At least in linux all the install buttons are in one app.
Were you born with some innate knowledge of how .exe/.msi/zip installers work on windows?
I was going to say...
Except it would run.
The firefox page would direct you to download the deb package for firefox, which will then pull up the graphical installer, which will get you all the benefits of the system package manager.
But for some odd reason, firefox doesn't give you a deb.
Instead you get an zip with the exe which then behaves identically to windows. You can just extract and double click to run it.
So yeah, instead of having to click through an installer, you just right click extract here and then run the exe, even easier.
But why would you even open chrome to install something, you can use the graphical package manager to do it even easier.
So no, really won't notice.
Also started W
I am trying to install something on Ubuntu right now. It says choose YUM, tar.gz. , .rpm , or APT.
Thats problem #1
I am pretty sure its the APT file but when it tries to download it says link needs to be opened with application with Software Center as default so I click ok. Error message: Not Found.
Thats problem #2.
>2016
>Being this autistic
You mean "Being this specific"?
I know .deb files will open in gdebi and be installed if you click on them in a lot of distros.
I don't kno what a .apt file is, have you ever used linux before complaining about it?
You really don't though.
There are tools to make deploying to all the linux package formats pretty easy, and even if you don't do that, if you release a .deb that's the vast majority.
Same fore testing.
That's a shitty website, it should offer you the deb straight away, just like it offers you the windows binary immediately.
It's not like it's hard to remember that on ubuntu you want deb files.
You have to do similar things for knowing to grab 64 bit, or even worse, sites that are ultra lazy and just through all the platform binaries in one page and let the user pick, then you have to be cognizant that .msi, .exe, etc are all windows.
The second problem might be a bug in the newest lts, I heard some complaints about gdebi being broken because of some change.
But windows has the same rule.
Don't use until the first service pack/ the first .1 lts.
Better than installing something on windows, and then finding when I try to launch it that oh no, it didn't install half the stuff I need, and now I have to go manually grab .net, this specific .net patch and half a million other libraries.
I've had far more issues with windows installers than linux ones, and I've installed a lot more packages on linux than I have on windows.
You can also always do sudo dpkg -i package_name as a work around if you aren't afraid of the terminal.
Did you do an upgrade of ubuntu?
Use windozer for gaming if you can help it. I suggest pirating it, but I've never done this myself. I just don't like Microsoft having money.
Some user posted this in a thread I browsed a while back:
>"no good games are on Linux"
thepiratebay .se/torrent/10411051/XCOM_Enemy_Unknown_The_Complete_Edition_Linux-Razor1911
thepiratebay .se/torrent/13449491/XCOM.2.Linux-ACTiVATED
thepiratebay .se/torrent/10343056/Sid_Meiers_Civilization_V_Complete_Edition_Linux-Razor1911
thepiratebay .se/torrent/12655561/Sid_Meier_s_Civilization__Beyond_Earth_1.0.2.666_LINUX
thepiratebay .se/torrent/9240828/[Linux]_Old_Ported_Games_Collection
thepiratebay .se/torrent/11746050/Hotline_Miami_2_(Linux)_(GOG)_
thepiratebay .se/torrent/10630981/GOG_Uplink_for_Linux
thepiratebay .se/torrent/8030737/Linux_games_bundle
thepiratebay .se/torrent/12741688/Baldur_s_Gate_The_Original_Saga_-_LINUX_-_GOG
thepiratebay .se/torrent/12749411/Baldur_s_Gate_2_Complete_-_LINUX_-_GOG
thepiratebay .se/torrent/3299227/Soldier_Of_Fortune_For_Linux_FULL_ISO
thepiratebay .se/torrent/3301607/Descent_3_Linux_ISOs
Oh, it makes the default software center.
Yeah, ubuntu did some renaming for that with the latest version.
Just use the software center to install gdebi and choose that, then select gdebi.
Stupid thing on ubuntus part, but windows has bugs too. Especially if you upgraded.
stop trying to download random binaries, use your repos
oh, it makes sense if the default is set to software center *
This too.
It's a far, far more secure model.
Downloading binaries off the internet should be a last resort. Easiest way for viruses to spread.
Also, you've probably had how many years using windows and getting used to it's idiosyncrasies, and have used linux for how long?
I figured it out. I didn't realize you use a separate program to update software you already have installed and that software center is just for the initial download. Thats still pretty silly it wont let me download and install the version I want but at least it gets me the latest version.
You can check out synaptic if you want.
If you want a specific version, the deb should work, but really most of the time you do want the newest.
Also using apt directly really isn't that hard, and it's nice too.
Why do people care about the year of the linux desktop again?
yes I have tried it all man.
I particularly enjoyed mint with the fluxbox DE.
but its still got the same issues so while I can personally deal with it I certainly cannot recommend it to anyone else for their use.
and no the software centers suck. You cannot just download a program and install it from a site. its not good enough yet sadly.
>implying Linux based distributions do not have their own great games
I do that occasionally though, normally works just fine.
Windows has plenty of issues too, you're just use to them.
Look you linux advocates are missing the point here...WE WANT LINUX TO SUCCEED! That is why we are giving you this constructive criticism. We are as always explaining to you the problems with linux for the average user...its not a debate. we are simply telling you why its not good enough yet...WE WANT TO HELP YOU.
What we really want is for linux to get BETTER. And if you gave a shit about the future of your operating sytem then you'd listen.
it's not whether you care or not, it's seeing why things are the way they are and discussing how to improve the existing flaws in something to make it better so it's a reasonable alternative.
But these issues are mostly why doesn't my decade of windows knowledge translate to a decade of linux knowledge?
And the occasionally legit bug, but that's what those are, bugs, they happen, and they get fixed. Everything has them.
There is a bunch of games and they work pretty well. I've been playing Stellaris and War Thunder recently.
>What we really want is for linux to get BETTER.
Alright. Show me your code.
no dude. its not like that at all.windows sucks but not in any way which would entail usability.
where as linux is solid as fuck...but lacks usability...
In the end linux is BETTER (yes im saying it) in many ways, but if a average person has issues just getting things done they will lose their shit. Mind you its gotten much better than it used to be, but for bigger adoption its gotta be at least as retarded easy as windows.
maybe google will finally merge android and chrome and make a desktop OS, but I have to admit I would rather Linux had overthrown MS (if only because I really fucking love the fluxbox DE)
>steam has lots of games FOR Linux, Linux itself has few
Sounds contradictory. Explain.
>Implying that will ever be finished.
Last I heard they couldn't even decide what type of RTS it was going to be.
But what are those usabilities issues?
I've converted plenty of people to linux before, give them a web browser, ubuntu, and they're fine.
You're issue was a bug wit the default programs, and that you didn't know the default format for your distro packages as .deb, where as windows you had memorized .exe
Give me some issues then.
>games on linux
There are lots, just check the google play store.
It's playable, and very fun right now
They will notice when they will try to use their iPhone.
They will also notice when they try to use Office.
I tried LoL with PlayOnLinux maybe a year or two ago. It was unstable as fuck with terrible fps drops, it would break at each patch. Things seems less buggy now judging by your screenshot.
I don't use an iphone so I can't comment, but works fine on android.
But both that and Office are completely out of our control.
We can't make that better.
Only apple and Microsoft can, it's their software, go complain to them.
It's completely nonconstructive to complain about those to linux users.
That's not a flaw in linux, it's a flaw in Office/Iphone for lacking cross platform support.
You're saying you're doing this to help us, so we can identify problems and fix them.
Fine, what's a problem that as a programmer, I can actually tackle?
I can't influence microsoft or apple, or any other corporation really.
Also, most people don't use office, and just use something like gdocs now.
this?
Because linux is for work and nerds, and being for anything else would "gift" it with a terrible software ecosystem like OS X's current one
User base determines developer base determines user base
attract retards, and everyone moves to BSD. which won't actually work out for you, because RH and friends are hellbent on killing BSD compatibility so they can start claiming more advantages over the free competition.
GNU+Linux is allowed to exist as a sort of flood plane or spilloff system for the huddled masses who have half a brain.
They ( we ) need something else in order to stay placid unlike the mindless drones who are content tapping screens with flashing colors.
If you are able to control their ( our ) escape, then any danger of someone producing something that would damage the status quo becomes negligible.
Welcome to the end, my friend.
>awesome + steam
Mah niggah.
I know that it's not Linux fault.
My point is people will notice it's not Windows.
Office is still a requirement for a lot of people. They don't gain advantage by using Linux for office stuff.
Yeah, I missed which post your replied to.
They gain an advantage by using linux for other things.
Security for one.
And most people still don't need office, especially when you only count their personal machine, not the office machine at work.
You're confusing Linux (it's just Linux) with OpenBSD.
>try to install Steam on Windows. Go to website, download exe, install, it updates. Done.
>try to install Steam on GNU/Linux Debian, go to website, download deb, magically open it, install it, click on it, doesn't work.
> you have to go though all this shit to install fucking Steam: wiki.debian.org
I kind of hate to be this faggot but....
If you guys want to see more gaymes on linux then you need to buy the games. Corps may or may not be impacted by piracy but they do notice their bottom line and they do track who is buying and playing their games on which platforms.
Hey, tard, you need to actually say what game that is otherwise you're just masturbating.
Isn't steam in the repos?
It is on ubuntu.
Or works on my machine.
It's non free software, so you have to manually add the repos.
Don't you have some kind of software center? Why would you go to the Steam website to download it?
It's called 0ad faggot
Calm the autism buddy, it's on the image. 0 A.D.
>He missed the humble bundle.
And this is why I installed Linux Mint as my first Linux distro
I thought the installer was considered fine though.
Reporting in
because people love being stubborn with their Windows habits
Debian doesn't come with one I guess. I don't have a problem to add the repos, and go though all this to install something but most of my normie friends don't. That's why I guess we don't have too much games for now.
Most of those normie friends will use ubuntu.
Good point actually.
Security is took for granted by the majority of computer users. Some just know they need an antivirus and that porn websites gives electronic AIDS.
It's not a selling point and even if Linux is more secure, people will still fuck shit up.
A saw a Mac once who got raped by malwares, adwares and Steve knows what else. The dude thought Mac were virus proof.
And yea, it's true that the desktop applications are in decline and that office is not for most of the market now. Tablets and smartphones are and replaced PCs anyways.
I've rarely seen people with fucked up macs/linux, compared to windows, and anecdotally, the same people who fuck up windows have been fine on other platforms.
It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better.
I agree for the Mac keeping people from fucking shit up more than Windows. I've actually never saw a neophyte going from Windows to Linux and not going back to Windows, but I saw them never coming back from Mac.
It just wreck I guess. Apple support more softwares/hardwares out of the box than Linux and a actual company with money runs the production and consumer support.
I still believe Linux is great for most uses and that people could get around with it, but it miss something that Mac and Windows have: Brand.
Normie detected. Nothing wrong with that, though
From gaming perspective you need to cater to a crowd who only know how to click install on steam. But in Linux every case is a special case, even Steam breaks often (examples: removing libraries after each update, no sound issues and a lot more).
So why would anyone want to go from a platform where everything is working fine to a platform where nothing is designed for the end user?
I wish that there were more games on Linux but it's really unlikely to happen anytime soon. Basically you need a company that actually makes profit from selling Linux for personal computers which is maybe what Steam is going to do but I'm not even sure if SteamOS is there yet.
Yea, because true Sup Forumsentoomen are so deluded that they actually believe Linux is a thing in the PC consumer world.
thanks satan
>muh gaems
That's not a valid argument. Poster also refers to Linux being inferior in personal computers domain.
I happen to agree with the poster, Linux has a long way to go to make year of Linux desktop happen.
It's fun playing multiplayer, the AIs were resource hungry last time I tried.
I can't get League to install, since components I need for PoL have Md5 mismatches. I think it's because the idiots at PoL hardcoded the md5sums for every install script.
Not that it really matters. It's evident that Riot laughs at the community. Just now starting to test a proper early DC system to prevent 4v5s, you know, seven years later.