>Bleeding edge without needing to install everything through a command line
>Basis for RHEL, so it's super stable
>Great package manager, much better than apt
Why aren't you using Fedora 23?
>Bleeding edge without needing to install everything through a command line
>Basis for RHEL, so it's super stable
>Great package manager, much better than apt
Why aren't you using Fedora 23?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because the name would make me sound like a faggot neckbeard, when I am in fact a tech savvy normie.
what is happening in that pic
someone should fork Fedora and call it pinkhat, I would use it.
maki is about to give the faki to a paki
Delete this
Because I'm not an edgelord who needs bleeding edge distros, I'm still on debian.
>but user, debian is insecure because it doesn't get updated as much
Total meme. You're more likely to get vulnerabilities from broken, buggy code than a stable, tested codebase.
*tips distro*
That's not Maki. Delete this.
>Bleeding edge
> super stable
Kill yourself
>DNF
>slow piece of trash excuse for a package manager written in python is somehow better than apt
Cute
because I don't want bleeding edge.
>"m-muh stability"
systemd
Because you can legally get RHEL for free in 2016.
>python is le slow meme
2001 called
Don't really give a fuck, I would use the CLI anyways.
Use DNF and see for yourself.
because it uses GNOME 3.18 and that shit is fucking unusable, it's literally worse than Unity.
Debian Sid.
...
>He's not using Gnome 3.20 with Wayland
wew
>bleeding edge
>stable
>Fedora
Pick one.
But pacman is superior to yum.
No one is forcing you to use GNOME with Fedora. You can download Fedora with different DEs here: spins.fedoraproject.org
Unlesa you're using debian stable, the "Debian is outdated" thing is a retarded meme.
Sorry, after experiencing rpm hell firsthand (around Red Hat 9 / Fedora Core 1) I vowed not to touch a rpm-based distro ever again. I understand things are better now, but the haunting memories remain.
Have they stopped making KDE ass ugly to make Gnome look better in comparison?
Yeah, I don't trust a distro made by people who shuffle their bad coding off to everyone else to work around.
>Bleeding edge
Fedora isn't bleeding edge. Unless your definition of bleeding edge is being stuck on old releases of GNOME for months at a time.
>Basis for RHEL, so it's super stable
RHEL doesn't draw anything from Fedora until it's well past EOL. Even then, half the shit in Fedora doesn't get into RHEL repositories.
>Great package manager, much better than apt
The only benefit DNF has over APT is the history command. Hell, the only package manager to actually add something worthwhile to package management is Zypper with btrfs snapshot integration.
But I am. Fedora also has an official Cinnamon spin, so that's nice.
>>yum is a great packet manager
>>Basis for RHEL, so it's super stable
As somebody who has actually used Fedora for a year, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
It's the most unstable piece of shit after archlinux
>Hell, the only package manager to actually add something worthwhile to package management is Zypper with btrfs snapshot integration.
>Not portage with USE flags, profiles and slots
>Not Nix with hermetically sealed, reproducible, isolated builds
>>fedora uses yum
Well it does, it's just "dandyfied"
...
Because I'm using CentOS.
cute
DNF is my baka senpai waifu
>Unity
What, did the package manager change?
Cuuute