Why doesn't anyone make a 24in 144hz 4k monitor?

Why doesn't anyone make a 24in 144hz 4k monitor?

I'd settle for 1440p. But, no 4k?

Connection technology capable of it is expensive and rare. Thunderbolt 3 can, not sure what else.

DisplayPort 1.4 finally has GPU support, so new monitors should follow

Acer XB270HU is 27in 1440p 144hz

ASUS MG279Q is as well

>using anything other than S-Video, VGA, or DVI

>24 in
>4k

yuge waste of money

Why? I want high pixel density.

good question

best you can do is 27in 144hz 1440p currently

otherwise you're doing 24in 144hz or 24in 1440p.

your eyes can't see past 1080p

You're going to need to try harder.

The real news is that DP 1.4 supports 4k @ 120hz

But it also has adaptivesync aka native freesync

Gsync in the trash

well high pixel density is good right? but if you sit just far enough away 4k & 1080p will look way too similar, but if you get say a 27" monitor at least, sure the pixel density will go down by about 12.5/13%, which is marginal at 4k. But i'd rather sacrifice from 8-17% pixel density in a higher screen size than essentially it looking the same as 1080p if my eyes are off.

I think that's why I want the compromise of 144hz 1440p 24in, but that doesn't exist.

There are 24' 4K monitors but none with 144hz.

I know, have to choose one or the other. It's a bummer. Like I said though, I wish there was at least 1440p.

Because 24" is only for poor people.

I have space constraints. I'd have to go down to 1 monitor if I was going to go bigger than 24in.

Space constraints for a 27"? are you in your fucking bathtub? gtfo.

For a 27in and a vertical 24in. It's doable but it would be cramped.

>tfw perfectly happy with 21.5"
then again I'm using 1080.

wait until 2017

the human eye cant see above 3.5gb anyway