gnu/linux or just linux?
Gnu/linux or just linux?
Since I am using the Linux version of GNU I call it GNU/Linux
Linux is the only correct choice unless you're a fat delusional freetard who likes to piggyback on the success of others.
Linux is successful because of RMS
GANOO PLUS LOONUX
Linux could not exist without GNU software.
i call it LInux + gNU + X
or for short, LINUX
"Linux" is fine if you accept Android, OpenWRT/busybox as all LinuxOS, same as Win2k...10 as all WindowsOS. Though things like the debian kfreebsd-gnu are pretty blurred under that definition.
>Though things like the debian kfreebsd-gnu are pretty blurred under that definition.
in the same way haiku and templeos are, that is, "not at all because they are entirely unrelated to linux"
kek
I call it Gentoo.
I use linux when I refer to the kernel but GNU/Linux for the OS.
For example no one calls Android a Linux OS, it just Android. GNU is nice enough to include Linux in the name.
Neither. Call the operating system you use by its name, Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, ChromeOS, Android, Whatever the fuck.
this
I don't give a shit because I use Windows 10.
>Declaring self computer illiterate
with systemD installed it should be called gnu-linux.msc
Oh boy! Another one of these fucking threads. Congratulations again you fucking automatons. You ruined 4chins.
>Physically making it harder for your self to use a computer
>Using Loonbugs
Speak English, Sup Forums
>Loonux
>Linux is full of bugs and errors
>Loonbugs
>using a system where you actually have to do more work to achieve the same thing.
>Still can't do as much as Windows
Ok Sup Forums whatever you say cool l33t hack0r race
What did I say, brain dead lump of shit?
You said you'd rather hand crank your car to start it like a fucking retard Neanderthal instead of using a normal system?
And GNU coreutils couldn't exist without the kernel so should we call them Linux/GNU?
Oh but they both depend on a processor so we should call them Processor/GNU/Linux and Processor/Linux/GNU.
What's it like running it day to day? I keep meaning to ask your trippy ass
>his distro comes with X
I like to call it GNU+Linux
Linux/Systemd
There's plenty of GNU software that doesn't depend on the Linux kernel at all. On the other hand, the Linux kernel could not exist without GCC.
...
Neither. The name is systemd
Linux is how it's been, Linux is simpler, Linux is less autistic, Linux is fair. It's Linux.
>Linux is simpler
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHHA
Great reply
Depends whether I'm talking about Linux or if I'm talking abou GNU/Linux
>GCC is part of GNU
>the Linux kernel could not exist without [being built by] GCC
>ergo, it's GNU/Linux
Do you live in a Carlos/House?
My rule of thumb is that if it's endorsed by the fsf or close enough so as to be very easy to make libre (Debian or Fedora) then I use GNU/Linux. Otherwise it's just Linux.
Linux. Just Linux.
I know what GNU's place in Linux is. I'm not slowly letting its value to the OS slip away every time I don't mention it when discussing Linux; that notion is laughable.
sure is pajeet in here
Linux for everyday life, gnu/linux for pure autism
both
I just call it gnu.
how meta
look at that loon. he wrote loonbugs and tells people to also use loonbugs.