So i own the WRT1900AC for about a year and a half now. Quite pleased

So i own the WRT1900AC for about a year and a half now. Quite pleased.

What does/g/ think?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tf0YHXq4fk8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Kinda good

Did you install Open-WRT on it?

>WRT1900AC
>CPU MHz: 2x 1300
>Flash MB: 128
>NANDRAM MB: 512
>Ethernet GBit ports: 5
>WLAN 2.4GHz: b/g/n
>WLAN 5.0GHz: a/n/ac
>USB ports: 1x 2.0, 1x 3.0
>Flashable with OpenWRT
>$229

That's pretty cool.
Do you rice it ?

I too am worried that my router is detected by radar.

After a while fiddling with the fan script in OpenWRT I can get 150+Mbps wan to lan over QoS, its fucking good.

10/10 best router.

I just got one. I'm satisfied so far with it too.

how did you get that overview page?
I have the 1200AC model, got it for 100€, which is pretty good I guess
Just began looking into OpenWRT

Step 1, install open wrt.

I have the 1200AC as well, its pretty nice. Need to fuck around with QoS and DNS some more, the custom build of open wrt I'm using is set to use some DNS server in Denmark or some shit.

Install openwrt on your router and edit cascade.css with your own background image.

fucking useless because it has no vdsl modem

>dsl
what shit country you live in that they still use dsl?

pretty sweet, I have an Asus RT-AC66U just installed yesterday :D

>WRT1900AC
>It doesn't even use Broadcom

TOP KEK

Why do you need your router to include a modem?

>wan to lan
explain

have the same one

nice router but only good with openwrt, if not = shit

>Step 1, install open wrt.
/thread

>It doesn't even use Broadcom
yes broadcom is the retardest cancer hardware shit on the whole universe

Is it a first revision with Armada XP or second one with Armada 385?
Anyway it would be nice to see some openvpn tests in real environment. It should be about 60-80Mbit reffering to some comments, but there is no proper test yet. Openvpn is sort of only thing why one would want such op router.

what wrong with broadcom chipsets? fill me in i am a scrub

I have installed openvpn on my openwrt WRT1900AC router. Working fine and without any problems. Next step for me is installing a radius-server on it for my wifi.

>bad hardware quality
>retarded support
>very bad linux driver support
>shit company name

Broadcom works fine for me, I get full 1000/1000 symmetrical line support.

>WRT1900AC
>not the superior WRT54G
Are you trying to maymay here or what?

okay well that was about as nonspecific as you could be. I will continue to use my broadcom router having learned nothing from you

Why use something like OpenWRT instead of DD-WRT? Serious question.

when you want tests or reports from me, then say which one, wtf. There are not only one or two options of "tests" there are much more. Serious m8.

because dd-wrt:
>in all the years there were never a stable version
>there are a lot of bugs and for me a bad webgui
>on openwrt you have more configuration options

I want a router, Sup Forums.

I want THE Router.

What do I buy?

Openwrt is sort of Debian for routers. You get the core, busybox, package manager and do whatever. All other ones, ddwrt, tomato, etc is just riced versions of openwrt or vendor firmwares, with 'friendly' gui, stolen proprietary drivers, more bugs, and broken customization. For some devices it works better, but in general its crap.
>THE Router
There is no such a thing.

Lower end Ubiquiti or Mikrotik.

basically what I should've asked was
>how would worse broadcom chips negatively impact me in realworld scenario
(89Mbps down, 10Mbps up, usually 2 clients streaming over wifi and one gaming wired)

I don't really care at this point, I was just curious

>OpenWRT
>Not Gargoyle

got a 1043nd few days ago, pretty satisfied

Daily reminder that 5ghz wifi is a meme.

2.4Ghz provides more range.

I fell for the 5ghz meme. Its good if your router is in the same room though.

I heard the wrt1900ac has reboot and disconnecting issues.

youtube.com/watch?v=tf0YHXq4fk8

>After a while fiddling with the fan script in OpenWRT I can get 150+Mbps wan to lan over QoS, its fucking good.

Is that supposed to be impressive? I get 500mbit wan to lan on an Asus RT-N18U, both with default firmware and with Tomato Shibby, and that router cost me 70$. It could do up to a gigabit too, but I didn't bother getting a gigabit line because the upload is 200m for both.

How is the "Temple of Nod" router? Meme router or good?

Edgerouter lite with hp 2810 from ebay or crs125 with three unifi ac lite will be much better way to waste your money