This man considers himself white

This man considers himself white.

This is a technology board.

a wild applefag appears to knight for his loved company

are u really going for this OP?

He's italian.

He has warm lights in the room.

Where's that video where he shows how he uses his Thinkpad while walking on the street? He seemed pretty white there.

italian german

not white?

looks greek/turkish. so white.

Not black
Has job
Dont like applel

For me he is whiter than blank page.

>defining whiteness by the consumer electronics people own
Do you legit have autism?

Nope. Looks South Italian with Egyptian blood in him. He'd be an average Roman if it were those times.

(OP)
This is a technology board.

He's a jew nigger, he looks like the bastard brother of this other jew nigger whos a bit more whiter

That's a sandnigger.

Sup Forums has the worst cross boarders.

He doesn't look remotely Greek. He looks like some mixed raced nigger.

Southern italians are not italians

>gee I want to be a racist fuck today
>but where
>obviously Sup Forums

Yeah, they have more in common with the old Latin people than the Lombard/Barbarian rapespawn up north.

>racist

How can you call someone a racist if race doesn't exist? Stupid liberals.

Saged, hidden, reported, called the cops.

He didn't say race doesn't exist.

Using the word "racist" implies that race can be discussed. But you can't discuss that which fundamentally does not exist. It's just another fallacious generalization.

By that logic you can't call someone greedy if money is imaginary.

>>racist
>How can you call someone a racist if race doesn't exist? Stupid liberals.
Zaorane

Greediness can relate to physical goods, not just money. It's a character trait after all, not a financial situation induced state.

That doesn't seem to be comparable to splitting humans into species, which is a wrong view because properties that pertain to species do not show up.

Your mental gymnastics are fucking retarded and I can't tell if you're being serious or a Sup Forums false flagger or what. People can discriminate based on social categories even if the category of purely social or if the social label does not 100% align with the objective groupings of things, this is why the label "racist" exists. Get the fuck over it and go back to Sup Forums.

>2016
>thinking that being white has anything to do with skin colour
What is this, the 1930's?

Why do you think there are so many brilliant researchers of Asian / African descent? Because it's the CULTURE you're raised in that matters, not your race.

>implying i can take baby niggers and make em' smart
niggaplease

>People can discriminate based on social categories even if the category of purely social or if the social label does not 100% align with the objective groupings of things

That only makes their statements wrong and their use of ungrounded terms particularly outdated.

The actual valid and reality-based term is "ethnicist". Doesn't sound so charged now, does it?

>what a nice technology board you have there
>it'd be a shame if someone tried to start an off topic thread and then have it devolve into a discussion of race, IQ, and genetics

Presuming they're not crack babies or some such, yes, you abso-fucking-lutely can.

I've met plenty of them, and Arabs too. We call 'em Oreos. Given that Sup Forums is so deeply fond of the idea of humans being
>blank slates
at birth, I find it befuddling you're against this.

Looks like a sand nigger

upvote

Do you have autism? Because I can't think of any other reason you'd get your panties in a bunch about a slight miscategorization.

When has a majority of Sup Forums EVER supported blank slate theory?

>When has a majority of Sup Forums EVER supported blank slate theory?
In the sense that it's an implicit prerequisite for the whole reductionist materialism bullshit? I'm pretty sure from its conception.

You can't have the cake and eat it too, son. I'm pretty sure the majority of Sup Forums supports a combo crackpot theory of
>we're blank slates.... oh, except for niggers

>wanting to be a blondie gay faggot
HELL NAW

>it's the CULTURE you're raised in that matters, not your race.

Culture isn't segregated. A black person has a higher chance than a white person to be influenced by the culture spread by black personalities. His skin color lends to more points of contact with black culture. The overculture still differentiates between skin color and it's deeply natural.

Do you have problems discussed this issue? Getting all stumbly?

>Do you have problems discussed this issue
dicussing*

Ethnicist is still inaccurate because racists rarely care about the ethnicity of blacks/Asians/Europeans/etc etc. Racism has a long history which is why the term racist is used.

Autistic people think differently than normal people. This is relevant information if we're going to have a discussion.

>Culture isn't segregated.
>The overculture still differentiates between skin color and it's deeply natural.
Obviously we can't agree on facts. I have personally met African-Americans who had never left the ghettos of Bronx to white neighborhoods (even to visit) because they felt they weren't safe let alone welcome.

And I'm a fucking yoropoor ffs, I've been to the States twice now.

You, my dear good sir, are full of shit.

>white people
KEK

The sissiest most effeminate faggot race around.

Lots of shitskins do.

Why haven't you killed yourself yet? What could you possibly have to live for besides shitposting? Just do it already, nobody will miss you.

>I LITERALLY can't even, like ugh. Just kill yourself bitch.
Way to prove him right about white people being so feminine.

Hell probably get called white by any sjw or diversity specialist in hr so let him have it.

Why do opinions of racists count to what is the objectively correct term to be used in situations that pertain to calling someone else racist? Calling someone racist isn't objective, as I implied before.

What or how anyone thinks doesn't pertain to objective discussion. Statements and arguments live outside of the bearer during dicussion.

You think those people didn't have that perception partly because of their skin color?