Redpill me on "why my privacy is important"

Redpill me on "why my privacy is important"

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/pcSlowAhvUk
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Schoolcraft
nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-whistleblower-adrian-schoolcraft-settles-suit-600k-article-1.2378974
nytimes.com/2014/11/10/us/police-use-department-wish-list-when-deciding-which-assets-to-seize.html
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1827982
youtu.be/85mu9PLWCuI
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

It's only important if you have something to hide, which most of the pedos who care so much about it do.

>It's only important if you have something to hide

t. cuck

Why do you have a door? Do you have something to hide?

Fuck off, bootlicker

t. pedo

Niggers can't walk into my house and murder me via the internet. Nice meme though.

t. pedo

>Please, come into my house and monitor my every move. No it's fine, I insist! I have nothing to hide anyway :^)

Cucked by Uncle Sam, tsk tsk

I don't have anything to hide. The police can search my house if they like. I don't mind.

It's not the police searching your house. It's the police standing behind you 24/7, watching your every movement, every second of every day that you're inside the house.

And? If the police want to watch me play video games and wank to trap porn, they can. I don't give a fuck.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

You start to feel watched and you subconsciously sensor yourself so the whole internet get ruined

Why do you think it isn't?

Being watched by a LEA doesn't compromise you being "secure" in any way. If anything, it's the exact opposite. Try again.

How do you know you can trust a LEA?

It isn't, unless you're a pedophile.

/r/ing a copypasta/image of why you should care

I think there were four reasons. One of them was that the laws might change. The psecific exmaple he gives is first they install cameras in everyone's bedrooms to discover domestic abuse, then later they gay sex and use it to enforce that etc.

Because you're human.

Presumably.

youtu.be/pcSlowAhvUk

...

If one person or group has access to watching you, others can get it as well.

It's important because you become a cuck for whoever is watching you. If they want they have complete control over you. Information is king.

Thanks user

Woah, like, so deep, man.

Probably the rigorous system of checks and oversight involved in their job though, if I had to pin it down.

*tips tinfoil fedora*

Let me know when you're done hacking into the FBI's hidden camera feeds, user. I'll wait.

How does that work if I don't have a gf?

Because google may be benevolent now but when government contracts surveillance to them they're definitely going to pick sides. Also what's your line for privacy? Internet based companies have also been very successful at changing people's mind on where the data gathering limit should be. If this question is blurry to you then you are part of the problem and in the future they're going to get access to your computer directly after another terrorist attack, and then they're going to attack certain groups. As a white cis male you're not going to notice it until they run out of targets.

I'm not one capable of such a task. But you seriously think that other groups, friendly or otherwise, don't have the capabilities?

>Probably the rigorous system of checks and oversight involved in their job though
Yep, just like this guy, who followed proper procedure

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Schoolcraft

Kill yourself, bootlicker

>Glenn Greenwald
To this day I can't fathom why Snowden would choose this retard.

Are you LEA? How do you have any idea what mind of checks and balances they have?

Their Fucking American too. Why do they need to collect data on people living in other countries? Muh terrorism right?

*tips tinfoil back*

Have any idea what's happening in China? Biometric scanners and a credit system based on what you say and do, and who you know and related to. All possible because of surveillance.

>but it will never get that bad here

Unless you're an absolute attention whore, some privacy is equivalent to some comfort.

You do realize "the rigorous system of checks and oversight" is constantly shat upon by law enforcement themselves, right?

>Woah, like, so deep, man.
Nice comeback. Pat yourself on the head and go to bed, you have summer school tomorrow.

>I like to give up rights at the slightest sign of danger becuase I am scared of black people
>I also like to deny that Privacy is a basic human need

Even the founding fathers would call you spineless faggots.

Redpill me on why you are wearing any clothes

Just go live in the jail literal cuckold

I think that I trust the law. There's no point living if you don't. Either kill yourself or move to another country where you can be "safe" away from law and order. A Brazillian slum maybe? No LEAs there to watch your back.

A handful of corrupt cops in a single department whose wrongdoings were immediately exposed and punished. How is this anything but proof that the system works, and that proper oversight is in place?

For any of your ideas to be true, everyone involved in enforcing the law, from the boots on the street up to the highest judges in the land, must be either incompetent or corrupt. And that's a bunch of baloney. There is oversight in what LEAs do every step of the way

(You)

Like I said, I have nothing to hide. That's why I'm not in prison. What do you have to hide, friend?

>Basing your existence on being able to trust the law or not.
Holy shit, user. You're either baiting or a shill.

Post your facebook ID along with the proof that it's yours

And yet nobody can provide a single reasonable argument as to why I shouldn't, beyond "well maybe this might possibly happen you never know, right?"

I do not have a Facebook account.

This user is right. It's just uncomfortable.

It's important to democracy.
Prevents hive mind.

>I didn't read a single thing in the link, I just assumed that LEA's were appropriately punished.
nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-whistleblower-adrian-schoolcraft-settles-suit-600k-article-1.2378974
>He remains suspended without pay.
>The alleged architect of his detention was Stephen Mauriello, his commanding officer at the 81st Precinct who is now a deputy inspector.
>No mention of the other cops being punished
(You)

Felate a gun and pull the trigger.

Post your Google+ or any social media then

The suit was settled. If he wasn't happy with the outcome, he wouldn't have settled. Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Not to mention the fact that the hospital staff expressed concern for his mental wellbeing at the time. But I guess they were in on it too, right? LEAs are corrupt. Judges are corrupt. Doctors are corrupt. How deep does the conspiracy go?!

I feel like it was implied that I don't have any form of social media by saying I don't have the most popular one. All of it completely passed me by.

Haha I like the way you are avoiding to post any social media. What are you hiding, pedophile?

>No proof as to why you shouldn't trust LEAs
Because there is substantial proof that LEAs circumvent the law, or bypass it with shady court orders with no public oversight.
You seriously trust other humans to be flawless and faultless in their enforcement? They are just as failable as you, motivated by money, promotions, and other factors to go against the law. Post your primary email and that emails password here. I'll just monitor it. Leave the email and password unchanged for a year, and don't switch your online accounts to another email address. You have nothing to hide right?

>The suit was settled.
>exposing and punishing

>overall thinking Griswold v. Connecticut is bullshit

I'm not avoiding anything. I don't have a social media account to share. Equally, your entire premise is flawed. I already stated that I wouldn't leave my door unlocked so that I could be raped and murdered by a gangbanger, which means I wouldn't hand out personal information to some sociopath on Sup Forums either. I do have something to hide - from you, not from the proper authorities.

See above.

And yes, individual LEAs can be flawed. But the system they operate in isn't. Their misdeeds are always brought to light and to justice eventually. I won't let a few bad apples ruin my entire outlook on everybody else.

Again, the suit was settled. Both against the police department and the hospital. There's nothing else to say.

>I do have something to hide
Okay now you are just backpedalling
>Proper authorities
What makes NSA a "proper" authority? Are you implying everyone has to live in the US?

>I don't care about privacy
>So I post anonymously on Sup Forums

Enjoy getting your rights eroded. Even the second amendment won't save you from the government now.

I find it hard to believe that you don't have a google account. Even so, post your browsing/torrenting history of past 6 months

What separates us from "proper authorities"? A badge? Oversight?
I've confirmed you're just baiting here. Enjoy your day

>Again, the suit was settled. Both against the police department and the hospital. There's nothing else to say.
Except for the fact that the Arcitect is still in the police force, and a deputy inspector.
Except for the fact that no punitive action was taken against the police officers involved, and not announced publicly.
Except for the fact that the police department is funded by public money, so the entire department, and by extension, the people who pay taxes and rely on the department are punished, not the police officers.

Be in denial all you want, but you are still a fucking bootlicker. Your reward is gonna be "civil asset forfeiture" on your car for your bootlicking.

And why dont you tell me how civil asset forfiture is anything but evidence of not only police officers being corrupt, but the corruption of the LEA system

nytimes.com/2014/11/10/us/police-use-department-wish-list-when-deciding-which-assets-to-seize.html

>Okay now you are just backpedalling

No, you're simply trying desperately to put words in my mouth and misrepresent my words to try and make them suit your argument.

>What makes NSA a "proper" authority?

That's a dumb question. The fact that they are given their power by the elected government of the land makes them a "proper" authority. Or are you one of those sovereign citizen nutjobs who refuses to recognize even that?

>Are you implying everyone has to live in the US?

No.

*tips tinfoil fedora*

We've covered this.

>Oversight?

Yes.

I've confirmed that you have no logical or reasonable arguments to offer. Enjoy your day.

Then clearly it was felt that their actions weren't serious enough to warrant dismissal. They were a breach of procedure, not a breach of the law.

And I can't read your link, since it's behind an account login.

Why don't you have a social media account? Are you a terrorist? Also, you're not willing to hand out your info to a Sup Forums sociopath but you're willing to hand out your info to a government sociopath? Do you know who will be watching you? Name? Address? Basically any of the info they know about you?

And why do you trust the system so much? It was designed by humans, and laws change every single day. Would you say that a lobotomy or a shock therapy was a correct way to treat psychological disorders? It was a "system" in 1950s. Japs were in concentration camps during WWII. It was a system. Slavery - it was a system.

>They were a breach of procedure, not a breach of the law.
>I have no understanding of what we are talking about

>And I can't read your link, since it's behind an account login.
>not knowing how to bypass NYTimes paywall.


Confirmed baiting.

>elected government
Wow elected by foreigners and I have to share my private folders to them. "the land" what a joke, try "a foreign land". Do you have any idea how stupid you sound like?

And yes, you really are backpedalling, quite desperately.

The court with appoint you one, and they'll make sure she matches your likes, dislikes,and personality for you based on the information they've collected on you.

Does this mean people who did NOT vote for the current government are irrelevant?

>I have nothing to hide
I do have something to hide

He just thinks differently. Probably exposed to high levels of nepotism in life.

He's just an idiot. Do you fail to see the amount of backpedalling in his posts?

What are you talking about? Slavery is perfectly fine. In fact, it would probably make everything better. How much better would slavery be with surveillance?

don't tell me you didn't enjoy the way he bitchslapped the talking points of the news stations when he was in debates

Found the weaboo loli and cp hoarder

Privacy is a spook, nerds.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1827982

Uh huh. I think we're done here then.

No, not irrelevant, but still bound by the law and governed by them, yes. Not voting for the current government doesn't mean that you're not governed by them, whether you like it or not.

I see we've degenerated into wanton shitposting already. I hope this (You) satiates you.

There is no backpeddling, no matter how much you try and will some into existence. My stance is perfectly clear and consistent throughout. You cannot find a logical argument against it, so you're resorting to name-calling and shitposting. I feel nothing but vindicated at this turn of events.

Ran out of arguments?
Too weak

Oh, it's quite plain. But he can't see it because he has a different mindset. I know someone personally who thinks similarly. They are quite... Authoritarian. It's just how they are. The world is so simple - black and white. Good and bad. You don't have anything to fear if your not doing illegal shit after all, so what's the problem?

Come back when you have a proper reply to and . Otherwise you can stop trying with that pathetic little attempt of yours

OP privacy is simply a measure of how much control you have over your information. online, you don't need to give advertising trackers unrestricted access to your web browser. they are known to serve malware and web browsers are notorious attack vectors.

>this entire thread

PEDOS BTFO

How will they ever recover

See

well, you're not worried about government oversight, you're not worried about your privacy, anyone who in fact cares about privacy from the government is now a "pedophile". If you trust the government so much, then tell me, do you support gun rights and why? I mean after all, if only the authorities had guns everything would be better right?

>Uh huh. I think we're done here then.
>Ive ran out of arguments

in fact you could even say anyone who wants to own a gun is just a psychopath school shooter anyway right?

>pose this question legitimately
>freetards just spam "cuck" as their answer
>every single time

It's just a bunch of neckbeards being autistic.

Yeah, just look at all those pedophile-allegation

Sure tumblr is here

Mine isn't but somebody else's privacy is.

You are right OP privacy is overrated.

That's why you should post your name, address, SSN, Bank account numbers, job, tax forms, internet history, porn habits, political affiliations, family members, licences, every location you have visited in the last 6 months along with a link to a network of live cams set up in your residence and vehicle right here right now.

You know, because you might forget about it or trip and fall in your home and we could help.

Unless you have something to hide...

It's only important if you disagree with the ruling party. Your privacy is what keeps a totalitarian government from completely controlling your life.

What's your facebook, famlam?

its "youdontunderstandsarcasmyoufuckingidiot"

Here's the be all end all. Are you ready?

If your privacy doesn't matter, why does the privacy of politicians and wealthy people matter? It's a heinous crime to hack into databases and collect sensitive information even if it's just contact addresses for the staff and/or politicians. If the people in power value their privacy then so should everyone else.

Poeple here only cry >muh privacy when they need to justify using half finished hobby software that (poorly) imitates popular commercial software.

How do I know? The very same people prefer a mobile os developed by an advertising company.

...

>this is the state of western civilization

Here's a simple explanation of why internet privacy is important.

youtu.be/85mu9PLWCuI

Lets be honest 90 percent of people that who that think privacy is important are terrorists or pedophiles that who that have alot to hide

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565

Read this paper written by a legal professional.

murrican hours on Sup Forums are fucking horrible desu senpai

C U C K
U
C
K

the founding fathers were cucks

Rights, probably the most important shit the constitution gives us.

The declaration of independence says that it is self-evident that everyone has certain inalienable rights, such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. As Immanuel Kant would say, everyone is given certain freedom, agency and protection because they are rational beings worthy of respect. This amount of freedom and agency that belongs to everyone from when they are born to when they die are their inalienable rights.

The government should respect all people to a certain degree by letting them have the rights to free speech, privacy, trial, attorney, habeas corpus and so on. The ability to defend one's life and rights is the right to keep and bear arms. These are universal and derives from logic and philosophy, while legal rights (such as the right to vote) are dependent of the government. In a sense "rights" aren't real, but neither are laws. This respect of the rational human that the constitution gives Americans makes it different from the rest of the world.

To give up your rights would be to give up your power and make you susceptible to tyranny.

Tell me your full name and adress and provide me with a comprehensive list of websites and physical places you've visited in the last few months.

No?

Why not?

Would you be comfortable with the government having a microphone and camera in every room in your living room?

No?

Then why the fuck do you want them reading your digital communication and knowing your browsing habits?

Upvoted.