Can someone explain these graphs to me please?

Can someone explain these graphs to me please?

Yes. It's like dicks. Longer is better.

Very simple, are you people retarded?

kek

Relative performance of X is better than Y.

...

Approximately 2x the performance and over 3x the performance in VR.

Are you retarded?

...

...

By how much? fps?

It means Nvidia 900 series gimping drivers will be available soon.

Literally could have read these graphs in 3rd grade.

...

It's not that hard, it is relative performance.

This is fucking retarded, frozen is clearly a 6.12.

So if i play tomb rider and i get 50fps on the 960, i will get 100fps on the 1060?

After Nvidia artificially gimped the 960 in their drivers, yes.

It's whatever you want it to mean.
Some want it to mean that one GPU is massively better, other want it to mean nvidia are full of shit.

That is the best graph yet LMAO...

I've been stuck in the 960 2GiB meme for a while now. I want out and onto the 1060

Jesus fucking christ. I'd never buy AMD but come on nvidia you must know we're smarter than that...

can never forget this gem

Virtually yes, in the same scene same settings etcetera.

Relative performance charts are better than number charts, mostly because you can't compare number charts unless the game has a built in benchmark that is 100% similar every run.

So far everything Nvidia has said about Pascal has been true, even that huge almost 3X VR bar.

Everything Microsoft says is also true
They even have bars!

...

kek, linux won't even recognize my 8 years old Wifi card and you think Microsoft are lying?

everyone knows Linux is shit when it comes to compatibility m8.

...

How do you expect them naming every printer they support on a piece of marketing?

Marketing bullshit?