/trigger warning/

Post technology that triggers you.

Also
>"rig"
>"outperforms"
>"IPC"

...

this board is ass

pokemon go

Frogposters

>android
>nexus
>google play

i mean, people aren't that stupid to fall into obvious traps
R-right?

async

>Getting triggered by the words out performs and IPC
Let me guess, you fell for the bulldozer meme.

"IPC" on its own is nearly meaningless on superscalar CPUs. There is no hard scientific standard to measure a single "IPC" number. It boils down to application "benchmarks", often proprietary and compiled with NSA/Microsoft Visual C++

>IPC doesn't real
Bulldozer confirmed.

>Windows 8
>Windows 10
>OS X
>KDE 4
>every hard drive and/or every PC my gf ever owned.

>being triggered

Define IPC for superscalar CPUs

>There is no hard scientific standard to measure a single "IPC" number.

"Instructions per cycle" is not specific enough for you?

>I don't know what superscalar architecture is

And one invalidates the other how exactly?

You can't boil it down to a 1 dimensional number because it varies not only by which instructions are used but IN WHAT ORDER. That makes IPC a buzzword for "my favorite benchmark".

>You can't boil it down to a 1 dimensional number because it varies not only by which instructions are used but IN WHAT ORDER.

Which is why current ipc numbers are prsented on average. Do you even research before throwing out random bullshit?

>on average
over what? Proprietary and as such entirely unverifiable benchmarks.

Hi Sam

Wait its an "o" near the end? I've always used pokeman because that's how I say it.

>OP got triggered over the fact that his rig's CPU got outperformed in IPC

Wp7 is dead ezhik

>"coding"

What are you even on about? Run a series of benchmarks, and from them you get an average of the cpu performance. Now your argument is proprietary benchmarks are not trustworthy. Is this some freetard logic I'm not aware of?

>e-sports