Why don't you have a 1:1 square monitor yet Sup Forums?

Why don't you have a 1:1 square monitor yet Sup Forums?

It is not comfortable tilting your neck upwards.

fat fuck

Because my field of vision is not as tall as it is wide

i would if they were affordable

If phone screens count, I do. As far as actual desktop monitors go, this

Why square?


If you want to see documents and such you can rotate your regular monitor.

>using a blackberry

>not using the best phones

They are very popular with teenage girls for some reason.

Of course they are, they're practically the only modern phones that have hw keyboards

It costs too much.
I use two 16:9 monitors vertically next to each other from time to time though and it's great.

Are you still stuck in 2009?

not everyone has a giraffe neck fucking retard

they're £1000. do any other companies make modern 1:1 monitors

Because 5:4 is close enough

16:10 or GTFO. I hate that the world has gone to 16:9...

4:3 is decent, too, but a nice 30" 16:9 is all the monitor I ever need. With 4:3 I needed a minimum of two monitors.

Because 16:9 was more workspace.

Why do you say 16:10 you mogoloid

it's 8:5 .. and 3:2 is better

>1920x1080 is more workspace than 1920x1920

Why does that monitor look taller than it is wide?

Also if I needed a lot of vertical workspace I'd just get a secondary monitor and rotate it.

17.7:10 > 16:10

>Why do you say 16:10 you mogoloid

Uh. Because that's what *everyone* calls it? Only an autist would simplify it, thus making immediate comparison to 16:9 (probably the most dominant aspect ratio in the world now) less obvious.

I don't need one.