TITAN X Pascal

>Synthetic CuDNN Benchmarks Show Up To 200% Performance Increase

wccftech.com/nvidia-new-titan-x-pascal-performance/

RX 490 when?
>RX 490 when?
RX 490 when?
>RX 490 when?
RX 490 when?
>RX 490 when?
RX 490 when?
>RX 490 when?
RX 490 when?
>RX 490 when?
RX 490 when?
>RX 490 when?

Other urls found in this thread:

wccftech
youtube.com/watch?v=TzdaOzxIsyI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Synthetic CuDNN Benchmarks
Oh baby. Can't wait to pwn some n00bz at CuDNN with my new Titan P!

kek

What is CuDNN?

ML library by nvidia that's significantly faster than anything else on the market (everyone uses it).

>using gpus for games
Waste of resources, back to Sup Forums with you

>>Synthetic CuDNN Benchmarks Show Up To 200% Performance Increase

shit, gonna have to buy one of theirs for my self-driving car project

...

>No DX12
>No Async
>No Vulkan

AMDfags on suicide watch

nvidia is just sending off everything they have from paxwell to have 1080ti and a possible HBM2 version to counter vega, next architecture is built ground up

The perfect waifu2x card

>No DX12
>No Async

Pascal is just tiny maxwell, it added some pre-emption stuff, but AMD hardware is built for A-sync, which is why it does so well when it's properly implemented ala DOOM

we do good in a single game. WWWEEEEEEE

>DOOOOOOOOOOOM

It's all about the CPU...

>wccftech
I hate Sup Forums so much and I can't get out. Wait until the damn thing releases. Fuck. This probably isn't the full Titan, they're probably holding that down just in case AMD pulls a Hawaii again. That's probably the reason they went with the retarded Titan X name again.

Sup Forums

>...
>generations old i5 at low clocks
Dumb shitposter. Everyone knows AMD has more overhead. They also have superior hardware but it has been suffering with this problem for years now.

63 vs 81

61 v 71

Looks like async works even in older CPU.

Hello guys, I dont want to make a new thread for this.
Can a 1060/480 upscale my chinese cartoons smoothly with madvr on 4k?

>you need the latest cpu if you want vulkan work well

I though the RX480 was for poorfags.

just wait for the gtx 1160 theres no games worth playing right now anyways

The RX460 is for poorfags. Anyone not running a at least a quadcore is mad.

The i5 is a quadcore...

>waifu2x
cancerous artifact-inducing meme

you have to be blind to think it looks good

so what about a real world test with like an i3 or FX 8 core? my FX chip at 4.4ghz can easily push past 120fps with my Fury X in it, obviously bottlenecked, but still great for my 144hz display

>...
Stop.
Let me clarify then. Anyone not running at least a Sandy Bridge quad core is mad. Even the FX83** can do some work when the APIs take advantage of its numerous cores.

>cpu bottlenecks
youtube.com/watch?v=TzdaOzxIsyI
it's okay when nvidia do it right?

...

>talk about vulkan
>post the witcher 3

>AMD hardware is built for A-sync

Why the 290/390 is faster than Polaris on Vulkan, DX12, A-sync and DX11 games?

hey i'm doing you nvidia shills a favour by using a gimpworks title aren't i

Tons of driver optimization

I will tell you a secret my son, the GlobalFoundry/Samsung 14nm is a mess

except it isn't

Not really, but it is their first run, the 5xx series cards should be more capable of hitting 1400/1500mhz

>14nm vs 16nm
>very poor performance per watt
>draw more power
>hotter
>low overclocking performance even with more voltage regulator module

Maxwell was already efficient, moving it to 16nm let it hit even higher clocks and maintain efficiency

GCN has never been good at overclocking, and is relatively power inefficient, the nano proved AMD could do it though, and the 480 is a lot better than the 290 or 390

Vega should be pretty solid if it's following fiji and has HBM2. plus they'll be more familiar with the process

Why SB and not zambezi ;^) I thought amdrones don't want to give money to jewtel.

the "poor performance per watt" is hardware a-sync.
nVidia tried hardware a-sync in the gtx400 series, le housefires.

No Rajesh, Async increases performance in Doom but it was not the one that propelled it high, it was Shader instrinsics, read more on your AMD Shilling guide next time

>hardware a-sync
amdpajeets need it because moar coars stay idle and their sheduler is shit compared to nvidia

>nVidia tried hardware a-sync in the gtx400 series
Source?

wut

Even Nvidia's cards have too much tessellation.

WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

The greatest victory is that which requires no battle.