azure.microsoft.com
Is Bash kill?
Other urls found in this thread:
fishshell.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Bash is better though.
Trips of truth
Powershell is gay
>embrace
>extent [You are here]
>extinguish
How can you port it to Linux? The whole point of PS is that like Windows it is object-based and not file-based like Linux. PS on Linux isn't able to do fuck all to the system and all over ent. apps that make PS so powerful.
Better off using iPython as system shell in Linux imo.
What's Microsoft plan with this?
It would be as useful as bash is on windows.
kek Microcucolds on suicide watch
>Powershell syntax
JUST FUCK MY LIFE UP FAMALAM
>MS
>open source
WAKE ME UP INSIDE
Publicity stunt?
Is there any advantage in using it over the alternatives?
Security Engineer here, POSH is god tier on Windows. Objects everywhere, interfaces with AD/Exchange/Sharepoint/Lync seamlessly.
Powershell on Linux would be terrible, stick with bash.
see
>Powershell on Linux
What can PowerShell do that bash cannot?
CAN'T WAKE UP
Suck
>Powershell
>on GNU/Linux
Embrace, extend, extinguish.
Don't trust anything coming from Microsoft.
Who the fuck even uses powershell?
Oh right, Windows admins.
not be archaic as fuck
See
>Embrace, extend, extinguish.
>Pajeet damage control shill
>windows still not officially open sourced
ayy
Make it easier to integrate with Azure and future products that will run on Linux like SQL Server.
>MS has to give away windows 10 for free because nobody wants it
>they have to open source .net and other unpopular components because nobody wants them
Maybe they will try to make it proprietary in a few years again, but it won't matter since these tools are shit anyway
systemd-denialists aside people only use shell scripts for find, xargs, shuf, and occasionally looping, and sometimes maybe a bit arithmetic. it's all about launching binaries in a flexible way. it's a bit embarrassing if you don't know how to escape spaces but overall there is no need for a typesystem in a shell.
Take over the Linux ecosystem because Windows is a dying platform.
Powershell... Bwahahahahaha... fucking hell Micro$hit just fucking die already.
...
Powershell has 0% market share.
They're hiding something else
this
Window/Linux
BASH IS DEAD
because of zsh
I firmly believe they're seeing it coming. Windows 10 turned out not to be the success they wanted.
I don't even get why they would do this but I'm tempted to try it
Is there any point to this for someone who uses bash or zsh?
Considering it was basically forced down so many users throats and it still didn't reach projected numbers. That's a bad sign. Windows 7 was amazing and ever since then these iterations have been shit. I mean 8.1 was okay and tolerable, but still not good. Windows 8 was ME tier.
I think their main intention with windows 10 is to cut down on their OS division. They want everyone to switch to windows 10 so they can cut support for windows 7 and 8 and the various windows phone OSes. Then they'll probably downsize their OS division and put more focus on Azure and MS Office.
At some point they'll probably just release windows 10 for "free" for everyone, unlike the previous offer that was available only to existing windows users.
Windows 8 is better than 7 though
No. Try fish if you want to experience something different.
Fish is dumb though. I actually think there may be more value in using something that has had as much as work/money put into it as Powershell than use some meme shell like Fish.
I don't think anyone will actually use PowerShell on Linux. It seems more like a PR move like when they released "Visual Studio Code" source and ported it to Linux.
Code sounds great and i'd use it if it weren't for the stupid forced hinting which makes my fonts look like shit and triggers my autism
Money yes, work, not necessarily.
Even if Mshit were hiring shithanded Pajeets to write their code, they would expect a certain standard from them, I'm pretty sure they have managers who are white, despite the head pooinloo.
>Is Bash kill?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Not enough, the development inside the company is pure idiocy. See pic.
>No one takes powershell seriously
>MS ports it to Linux
kek that's not gonna work
That's only an issue if systemd/Linux software is subpar.
>dude check out this IRC chat logs, that's how you know it's legit
gr8 post m8
>bash on Windows
>powershell on linux
it's actually pretty nice
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
I think it's nice too. It's verbose, but at least it's consistent and makes sense. "It should explain what it does" is a much better standard for naming than "It should require as few keys to type as possible", especially since aliases and autocomplete exist. Plus, being able to pull information from structured objects is amazing, especially when compared with parsing a single stream with grep/sed/cut.
Full fledged autism
I just stated what I meant in the previous post, user can interpret the facts by himself,
Because: Microsoft have a terrible reputation within the FLOSS community. FLOSS is extremely popular and important nowadays (for instance if you don't have a github you are literally nobody). Microsoft lost the server OS war. Nobody likes Windows 10. They are starting to smell like another IBM. 99% of CS students never used any MS product for system administration nor software development. Basically they are scared as fuck and trying new things to get out of the death spiral.
Bash has decades of lead time and its been purified by open source. Developed over decades for speed and ease of use.
The fucking bash prompt is probably the best part of linux. Legitimately one of the pieces that is not shit. And I am willing to admit there is alot of shit.
It made sense for microsoft to import it but exporting their own power shell shit that no one likes doesnt make sense.
What the fuck is this going to accomplish besides people ignoring it?
EMBRACE
EXTEND
EXTINGUISH
why the hell would I install some shitty NSA software on my clean GNU/Linux computer?
>GNU/Linux
>clean
Linux without Unix legacy shit when?
zsh is even better
>some shitty NSA software
en.wikipedia.org
systemd shill detected
...
To be a real patriotic American who supports his failing technology industry
...
>(for instance if you don't have a github you are literally nobody)
>Donald Knuth
Bash wasn't developed over the decades for speed or ease of use, backwards compatibility has been one of the major goals instead. Bash has a shit-ton of "Gotchas", and it's slower than shells like Debian Almquist.
But ZSH is better.
He's retired
From teaching. He's still publishing.
but powershell is trash
Considering how slowly he writes new volumes of TAOCP he has probably been working on the CAPTCHA to create a GitHub account for a few years already.
From what I remember from using it, it's a fair bit nicer than bash.
>handles tabular data natively
>consistent API
>modules to separate code
>object-based API
...
windows hasn't got a consistant API
...
Last major WinAPI change was NT. So, pretty stable.
I'm talking about Powershell, which isn't the Windows OS. It's a shell. You got a little confused there.
????
it changes every few years
that is the biggest problem
>all NT binaries and many 98 ones will work on w10
What changes are you talking about?
You don't need a github to teach or publish. It's for software developers, numb nuts
I think you're talking about GNU/Linux.
>what is grsec's RBAC
>what is AppArmor
What does it say?
Asuka a fucking shit
Former Microsoft employee here
That's all pretty accurate. Some teams are a lot better than others, but in general most teams are absolutely awful. The bit about bug prioritization and refactoring is spot fucking on though.
OOP in a shell is a bad idea.
>tfw windows 8 was a thing because new things > fixed things which means more $$$
Sounds like the guy trying to add something is just plainly incompetent though.
user, I've got bad news.
8 and 8.1 are the same retard
Not having to write your own shitty parser to read data from another program is the best part of PowerShell. It doesn't matter how easy and quick you make slicing up strings, having structured data from the get go is just a better way to do things.
>Unfortunately, the other group decided that their API would only work on 100 users at a time.
Why would they do that? Legitimately curious, as I'm using another Microsoft service with a similar limit.
>noob here
What's wrong about the SQL query rant at first black line?
An open operating system does not only have advantages
As in, there are disadvantages.