Why haven't we seen any APU benchmarks for dx12 or vulkan?

Why haven't we seen any APU benchmarks for dx12 or vulkan?

Because they're all shit and not worth the time.

ai generated porn when?

wtf I like black girls now?

Find me something better value than an a8 7600, 7650k, or 7800.

>good enough igpu for 1080p gaming, albeit on medium or low settings
>much than an i3

Imagine the stench

Because APUs that are slower than consoles are not relevant for gaming
AMD apparently releases a fast one in 2017 though
So maybe then

imagine my dick

>Apoo
>any year

It would still be interesting to see what boost it gets going to dx12/vulkan

Also curious how the igpu affects dx12 multiadapter

Vulkan/DX12 multi-GPU is already dead
No one cared about SLI/Crossfire as well other than GPU manufacturers because less than 1% are using 2 GPUs together

Multigpu with the igpu is just free performance though, isn't it?

>Why are you still wearing your shirt, user?
>Aren't you going to swim?

Not necessarily
But even if it was it would be a very small gain at best

>very small gain
Usually that's all you need for a consistent 60fps experience.

Zen, HBM 2/3 and DDR4 will make low-mid tier GPUs obsolete, because you can get "good enough" performance for basically no extra cost

Imagine the smell

iGPUs are already "good enough".

Doesn't the a10 7850k have an r7 250 igpu?

Wouldn't that be like 10% free performance or more?

>Doesn't the a10 7850k have an r7 250 igpu?
Not quite. The 250 has 384 stream processors, the 7850k has 512. Memory bandwidth is a huge deal here though, so the 250 may have an advantage in some titles.