Can you see a difference in rendering in these two pictures?
On is wayland and one is X11
Can you see a difference in rendering in these two pictures?
On is wayland and one is X11
Bottom is better
x11 on top?
top fonts are fuzzier
same for my eyes.
[spoiler]it's actually wayland on top and I prefer it over x11[/spoiler]
One on the bottom looks better to me
+1 for xorg
Also
>a good thread gets no replays because all Sup Forums cares about is GPUs now
Why did Shuttleworth have to fuck up the transition to Wayland and fracture the Linux graphics infrastructure?
Rendering is almost always client side on X11 and ALWAYS client side on Wayland, any difference in rendering between X11 and Wayland is due to application code.
tl;dr OP is a retard.
I can see the difference, the bottom one has better support, more software options and has had more development time to iron out bugs.
The top one's a meme
>Blaming Shuttleworth for the nature of FOSS
Wayland will most likely win out, just like how upstart got canned.
I don't see a significant difference
The rendering on X11 takes place on the server.
Get your shit right.
They literally, pixel by pixel, the exact same.
I checked, here is the pixel diff
The literal only difference is the bottom has a shadow at the top
OP is a fag
>using antialiasing
>javascript
>all those global variables
>console.log()
pls no
Which one has screen tearing?
Rob Pike go away.
This is Google's code.
You need to ramp up the contrast in your test to see the other differences. For example the lowest dot of every capital P (except the one in loadPage) has different color in the two (#401b58 vs #3f1b58)
rob pike uses acme without syntax highlighting
Rob Pike post 1995 is absolute cancer.
why?
X11 allows server side rendering as an option but all modern X11 applications render client side using DRI, SHM and falling back to PutImage when those are unavailable. This includes everything written using Gtk and QT.
Get your shit straight, idiot.
This. He got stuck in the Plan9 era.
No, they both look like shit.