Thank you, American people, for electing me! Now, starting today...

>Thank you, American people, for electing me! Now, starting today, we'll be establishing strong restrictions on non-military encryption use in order to fight terrorism and child pornography.

Wat do?

Other urls found in this thread:

feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=EA927EA1-E098-4E62-8E61-DF55CBAC1649
youtube.com/watch?v=-xlmU9LvtAs
isidewith.com/candidate-guide/gary-johnson/economic/trans-pacific-partnership
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Fucking cunt. This year's elections are fucking worthless.

Stop running asswads for Prez.

Fuck it, I'm moving to New Zealand

Hillary wants to fight terrorism by creating an authoritarian police state.

Trump wants to fight terrorism by actually keeping the terrorist migrants out of the fucking country.

It's not rocket science, Europe and America don't need a bigger umbrella, they need to stop the damn rain.

So Gary Johnson is the best candidate? Couldn't agree more!

I can't wait till the amerilard election cycle is over

Both of your candidates are shit

Now stop shilling for Killary and fuck off she's bad too

i think our mega friend just demonstrated that helps fuck all

Boy do I love lurking Sup Forums... oh wait

>Americans only have two parties
must suck living in a shithole

Must suck that which ever party wins will have more influence over your nation than whatever puppet government you elect

Hide tripfag posts.

Ignore tripfags.

Do not reply to tripfags.

>Wat do?
encrypt everything always because there's no possible way to enforce this.

>restrictions on non-military encryption
Time to enlist. Veterans get all the perks.

If Trump won he would just be another rich puppet that will sign anything his vice president or the DoD gives him.

think Bush. The biggest worry is, nobody knows who his Dick Cheney would be. Which is troubling. You can't even see the real mastermind behind Trump.

>looks at Hillary
Oh wait...

>b-but John Oliver said Drumpf is a Nazi who will steal muh interwebs!

Oliver is pretty insightful, but I prefer Lee Camp.

fuck NZ, they killed Mega

you dont think it sucks?

do you really expect hillary will lose? she can not lose. (((they))) can not lose

>banning math
>schoolchildren everywhere rejoice

have you been living under a rock? huge anti-establishment and anti-globalists everywhere in the western world. just look at fucking brexit, caught all the leftist fags with their pants down

this

Literally cant be done. Pgp/gpg, veracrypt, dmcrypt are all open source and have been around for years.
I also highly doubt that he would go this far.

>apple, samsung, etc
No one gives a shit about these, nsa already has a way breaking into idevices provided by apple themselves.

>gary "open borders" johnson

yeah no

>hillary wants to stop the damn rain
>drumpf wants to put up a bigger umbrella
>we don't need a bigger umbrella, we need to stop the damn rain

Ok.

>I'm a one-issue voter

Even if open borders was so bad, you can't possible ignore how Johnson and Weld are better than the others across the board.

Literally can. Just outlaw it, and whenever you are caught (and you *will* slip up), you better have some lube ready.

Ugh. Sup Forums is leaking again

you do realize there is a large portion of the left that is anti-globalist and anti-establishment. Fucking brainwashed people will believe their party/people aren't just as corrupt. Hell the American Left isn't even really leftist.

>b-but muh encryption strawman

Where did he say this? I can't find it except for Apple bullshit

>you do realize there is a large portion of the left that is anti-globalist and anti-establishment
and that's why trump has a serious chance of winning. people despise shillary

>Ugh
You lost? Here's a helpful link to get you back to where you belong: www.tumblr.com

Also, you do realize there is a large portion of the right that is globalist and establishment.

feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=EA927EA1-E098-4E62-8E61-DF55CBAC1649

Banning encryption is part of the Democrat platform.

Trump is the definition of the problem. He's a big, white, male, rich, powerful bully. Everyone despises him, except for racists.

>American politics

Enjoy your oligarchy

You misspelled "Jewish platform".

This stupid jewspiracies meme has grown old and stale, tbfam h.

>>>/tumblr/

If the degenerates would stop watching their pedo cartoons, trump wouldn't need to ban encryption. It's time to grow up and v stop watching cartoons.

>>politics
ftfy

Found the sjw cuck

>implying implications
I don't like trump or clinton, or john oliver for that matter, I'm just stating that enforcing this is impossible because it basically is.

Regardless of who we get for the next 4-8 years they're both anti-encryption.

That is how you realize a two party system makes no sense. People are forced into two camps to fight for power when you see there are a lot of people on both sides that have common goals. It ends up breaking people apart which is great for the political elite.

also, if you still think Trump isn't as corrupt and pro-establishment as Hillary you have successfully fallen for propaganda. And not very good propaganda. It is so obvious it's surprising that people fall for it. He lies and changes his tune constantly and then people are like,"why no vote for Trumpo?"

Because he lies and panders to people just as much as Hillary does. He just panders to a different group.

Dianne Feinstein is an authoritarian cunt though.

t. Hillary Clinton
also thanks for correcting the record

Nigger, you gotta read better.

>Gary Johnson

youtube.com/watch?v=-xlmU9LvtAs

Gee, I wonder (((who))) could be behind this post.

>if you still think Trump isn't as corrupt and pro-establishment as Hillary you have successfully fallen for propaganda.

Nobody running is as corrupt as Hillary except for McMuffin (Who I don't even think got on the ballot in literally any state)

He nor Clinton want to ban encryption. They simply want to have a system like the UK where not handing over your encryption keys to the police is a mandatory prison sentence. They also want backdoors in every major encryption implementation because derrorisds

ONE

ISSUE

VOTER

>That is how you realize a two party system makes no sense.
A "shitload of parties" system doesn't necessarily work much better, frankly.

The same shit happened in my country; people were kinda fed up, they fell for the populist nationalist right "anti-establishment" meme, the populist nationalists are now working with the old right to continue the same shit policies that everyone was fed up with.

In addition to this, there is the problem of the cabinet sometimes being formed of 4-5 different parties. It ends up being dysfunctional as fuck because there is no real shared idea behind it all. They just fight against each other and no decisions get made. I know this kind of shit happens in the US, too, though, despite the smaller amount of parties.

>Oliver is pretty insightful

Let me guess, you're one of those people who makes fun of people for getting their news from Fox news but gets his news from John Oliver and The Huffington Post

Democracy makes no sense.

Your personal, anecdotal experience with populist candidates does not reflect on Donald Trump, keep that in mind.

>Gary Johnson
isidewith.com/candidate-guide/gary-johnson/economic/trans-pacific-partnership

He's a fake libertarian.

>Not reading Huffington Post or watching John Oliver

Come on it's 2016

>One issue voter
You act like this is bad or that some issues aren't more important than others.

Protip: encryption and potential wars, both race and world, are more important than walls and feelings.

I actually get all my news from Buzzfeed and Now This.

Coalition goverment is not a democracy

Let me guess, you think a Peabody Award winning host isn't a legitimate news source just because he has different opinions from you?

He isn't a legitimate news source because he uses "arguments" like "it's the current year" and contradicts himself constantly.

Does Key & Peele's peabody award also make them a good news source?

But that's a legitimate argument, user. What, you don't believe in the evolution of human thought and our understanding of the world?

>Your personal, anecdotal experience with populist candidates does not reflect on Donald Trump, keep that in mind.
Oh, of course. It is just my bet that that will happen. There is no way to really predict what he'll do.

Politics isn't science though, the best we can do is analyze him and similar political movements elsewhere, and of course the history of US presidencies and so on and so on... After that, we can make guesses, but only time will tell.

Guess who also contradicts himself constantly?

BROTIP: he is running for president under the Republican ticket!

It's an ad hoc fallacious argument and also pack mentality social shaming. It's bullshit and so is anyone who says it seriously.

>linking The Atlantic

Holy shit at least the liberals and Bernie bros on Reddit are a little smarter.

>unions were strong

Stronger than today? Of course. Most manufacturing jobs went overseas though which took away their peer base.

>government was big

Demonstrate that government had a larger scope over daily life previously than it did today

>taxes were high

On paper. The rich didn't pay them.

>libcuck article status BTFO

>also quoting "one man" as the straw man trump supporter

Quality journalism my double digit IQ friend

I think trump is a massive retard, but that doesn't mean I like John "CURRENT YEAR AND YOU STILL ARE DOING WELL THING I DON'T LIKE" Oliver.

You think a biased talk show is legitimate because it panders to you?

Nearly 20 years of reaganomics killed our manufacturing base.

How is Drumpf going to help with that?

>I think trump is a massive retard

Why?

>20 years of reaganomics killed our manufacturing base.

Wrong, retard.

>deport mudslimes
>no more terrorism or cp

he is already lying (or just being ignorant) so often that why the fuck should we trust him

>Thinks the internet belongs to America
>Thinks encryption needs to be backdoored because Muslims
>Thinks websites can simply be "shut down"
Etc.

This is Sup Forums. I care about tech related issues. I don't give a fuck about Muslims or Mexicans.

>he thinks Trump and Regan hold the same views because they were both republicans

Are you kidding me? Regan was the one who also signed amnesty for 11 million illegal immigrants because it would provide cheap labor for corporate interests and undercut the unions he was against. But to answer your statement, Trump wants to place tariffs on corporations that manufacture overseas to incentivize them to do it in the USA and will block globalist trade deals (the kind that Hillary supports)

> mudslimes
Go back to pol, Drumpftard.

> Are you kidding me?
LOL. Drumpfcuck tripfag is *TRIGGERED*.

>because Muslims

Because literal terror attacks in San Berndidto where the toerrorists phones could have info about their associates/more terror attacks

But dumbasses paint it as OMG MUSLIM HATE CRIME

Anything in particular you don't like about him, or are you just going to be tactfully vague?

As far as I know, Trump has only mentioned encryption regarding Apple, who already have backdoors in their software. He would allow them to turnover data only in cases where the owner of said data is a confirmed threat to national security. I don't see anything wrong with this at all.

>Thinks the internet belongs to America
>Thinks websites can simply be "shut down"
Source?

>it's this retard again
gb2pol

> sjw cuck
Says the dumb poltard.

nice samefag

You go back to pol, stormtard.

These trips, which you couldn't get unlike me, show I am right and you are wrong. Now hush.

test

It's CTR, you can tell by their shit-tier meme game.

>Anything in particular you don't like about him, or are you just going to be tactfully vague?
I'm going to be vague because I don't care about the specifics as much as I care about why Trump fans like him

its interesting yet it is incredibly hard to get anyone to explain what it is exactly, that makes them place their trust in Trump - besides vague "well uh he was a pretty damn good businessman" kinda stuff

kill yourself you're the one shitting up Sup Forums with your hill-shill

The old internet buzzword was "faggot" but something about "cuck" seems to trigger white liberals way more than "faggot" ever did

It stings them for some reason. Perhaps subconscious?

> MUH jews
Go back to your containment board stormtard.

>its interesting yet it is incredibly hard to get anyone to explain what it is exactly, that makes them place their trust in Trump - besides vague "well uh he was a pretty damn good businessman" kinda stuff

So you admit to knowing nothing of his platforms and then you continue to make broad generalizations based on your own anecdotal experiences. Not an argument.

>Trump contradicted himself therefore John Oliver is a legitimate journalist

?

kek

You tell me tripcuck. Now take your Geass to your containment board.