I can't be the only one who notices the similarities between the extreme left and Stallman freetards

I can't be the only one who notices the similarities between the extreme left and Stallman freetards.

>liberals
>extreme left
Communists are extreme right then.

stallam is a socialist that's eterally assmad his colleges got insanely rich while he wears the same red shirt and begs for dontations everytime he speaks

Stallman's rules are clear-cut
Feminist's rules change on a whim

>he wears the same red shirt and begs for dontations everytime he speaks

That's just what Jews do, user.

>You are free to do anything you want as long as you don't kill people
Fascists.

They're all ugly?

yeah, no

krek

On a deeper level he kind-of has a point.
There's really only so-many ways to do things, It's also why we use synthetics in drugs, you cant patent bell pepper extract but you can make a synthetic of the extract and patent that and sell it.
"My precious fee-fees make me sad when i see things I don't approve of so stop" is complete self-important bullshit however.

AHEM... THAT'S A BIT SEXIST.............

You're probably not the only total retard out there.

The "freetard" version of the "liberal" side is more like

> you are free to say anything you want as long as everyone else can too. suck it censors

More like

>"You are free to say anything you want as long as it doesn't offend me"

What is freetards? Go back to gayming kiddo.

No. There are plenty of people who made those inane observations.

Liberals want you to change your views just by nagging about it.
Freetards write software and allow you to use it for free on their terms.
It's not remotely close.

So the right is moderate.
Let's vote for that guy whith the fake university, who blew his father's fortune.

>guy makes a knife freely available for you to use
>his only rule is that you can't stab people like a daft cunt with the knife
>WOW WHAT THE FUCK THIS KNIFE ISN'T EVEN FREE IF I CAN'T STAB PEOPLE THEN WHAT'S EVEN THE POINT OF KNIVES LITERALLY WHY DO KNIVES EXIST IF I CAN'T MURDER EVERYONE AROUND ME

This is you. This is what people who bitch about GPL sound like.

Whether or not you agree with Stallman's views on free software, it is not "nonfree" or inconsistent to restrict GPL software from doing things deemed anti-freedom by the author of the license. Stallman views proprietary software as evil bullshit that disregards users' freedoms, so why would he give you the freedom . . . to infringe upon someone else's freedom?

>WOW WHAT THE FUCK THIS KNIFE ISN'T EVEN FREE IF I CAN'T STAB PEOPLE THEN WHAT'S EVEN THE POINT OF KNIVES LITERALLY WHY DO KNIVES EXIST IF I CAN'T MURDER EVERYONE AROUND ME

gross exaggeration

It's apparent you are a fucking idiot.

Thank you for correcting the record.

Those aren't liberals. They are cultural marxists

ahem

>liberals
>against free speech
Don't you mean conservatives?

More like
>guy makes knife freely available for you to use
>you chop down a tree and carve out some furniture
>you use the knife for one small portion like a decal or finishing touch
>you have to give away all your furniture for free

yea was gonna say this, Stallman isn't holding a gun to your head and forcing you to make your software free as in freedom. He made the rules which need to be followed if a software wants to be recognized as truly free.
4 essential freedoms of the user need to be respected by the program if it wants to be considered free:

-The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0).

-The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

-The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).

-The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

Nah , you can coppy write stuff made in gimp, if you make something FROM gimp then it has to be free.
You can sell the wood/work but not the knife.

It is roughly analogous. Guy writes license that he wants to make the world as free as possible, so he lets you do literally anything except fuck over other people and take their freedoms.

Crying that you can't use a license to fuck over other people when its entire purpose is to promote freedom and prevent the fucking over of other people is stupid.

stallman is already tumblr tier enough himself, this isn't surprising at all

you can agree with his ideas on software freedom while also recognizing that he is a fat turbolefty bern victim faggot who deserves zero money from anyone. I wish some non-retard would take up the mantle of free software and this obnoxious assburger fucking died from his obesity already

(OP)
>Libertarians: You are free to do anything you want as long as it doesn't violate the NAP
wtf I hate small government now

While it is worth noting that Stallman IS a socialist, comparing his philosophy with regards to liberalism is rather flawed. Stallman is not seeking a law forcing all software to be free. He is using the free market to perpetuate the use of free software. You are perfectly capable of using non-GPL software. You are perfectly capable of developing software on your own that does not use GPL libraries. But if you use software that is GPL licensed, you have to obey its terms and conditions, which is that the software remain free, even when you distribute it. If you don't want to do that, don't distribute GPL software. You aren't entitled to use other people's work how you want on your own terms.

So basically, stallman is lawful neutral scum?

>nononono i think that's wrong don't do it no matter what the end
>oh fuck why is everything i'm involved in stangating
>why are people who pursue just ends instead of just means taking over
>fuck

...

Would have been a decent meem if it didn't have SJW barking in it.

>free market
>intellectual property

lol no

and the source code is not neccessary for the four freedoms, only convenient, especially for talentless, friendless, moneyless losers like stallman who could never make or have made a reverse engineered program were it legal

but stallman is an SJW, read his political notes

stallman.org

I consider stallman a nut, and some people in the foss communities to be a little bit like vegans.

Liberals, that is Neo liberals not the classic ones, or progressives as they like to call themselves, are a bunch of buffoons that like to restrict people's freedoms, and are highly hipocritical while doing so.

The issue at work is, many people in foss communities are progressives, you often find safespaces and echochambers more often than in real life and they feel entitled to the word for being able to produce something of use (not always the case) that's open source.

But open source software IS open and transparent, also inclusive, which is not exactly in line with progressive tactics and ways of thinking.

...

>stallman is an SJW

Why does Sup Forums hate SJWs yet still support Stallman?

>make your software free goy, you'll be a massive enterprise success like redhat and rake in billions!

t. nobody