Why such browser doesn't exist?

Why such browser doesn't exist?
>Chrome's rendering engine
>Firefox's addons
>Fast as Edge

Other urls found in this thread:

edgeadblock.com/
benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2016-09-03/modularity-and-webextensions/
mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/firefox-dev/2016-October/004639.html
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Why such browser doesn't exist?
>Unix philosophy
>One program to do one thing and do it well
>All browser are monolithic piles of shit

I need a browser with ublock origin and noscript.
Firefox is piece of shit that lags even on my i7 4770.
Edge is super smooth but no addons.

What do?

>fast as edge
Edge is slower than Chrome and Firefox on my computer

The modern web isn't about doing one thing. It's so fucking bloated that any web browser that's actually compatible has to be a monolithic pile of shit.

Microsoft Edge can use greasemonkey scripts now. IMO the rendering is better there than on Chrome. The only thing it's missing is cross-platform sync. If I can sync to my mobile phone then I will honestly ditch Chrome and Firefox in a heartbeat.

Tampermonkey works on Edge so you have all the Firefox scripts

Great, now I need noscript to block all shitty javascript and im set.

Because the three lock each other out directly.

Also, Chrome has the worst rendering engine out there. It's fragmented as all hell.

edgeadblock.com/

DownThemAll! is the only reason I haven't completely uninstalled Firefox yet.

>Why such browser doesn't exist anymore?
Fixed, no thanks needed.

>giving in to the chinese botnet

>he doesn't use k-meleon

>dat interface of the past
HIDOI!

Why doesn't Sup Forums develope said browser themselves?

I will make a logo

Surf from suckless

I'll make the website

Firefox's addons are powerful but they hook into Gecko at a very low level. They're explicitly made for Gecko and very non-portable by design. Making large modifications to Gecko is risky, you can break thousands of addons unintentionally just by changing something.

I'll suck a dick

Kill urself

Mozilla devs are very interested in webextensions, it looks like they could end up making the entire browser out of them even.

benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2016-09-03/modularity-and-webextensions/

mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/firefox-dev/2016-October/004639.html

Mozilla's implementation of webextensions does not have to be exactly like chromium's. If they actually do follow through with using the webextension APIs for the browser components they will likely have to expand the amount of APIs.

You don't fucking need noscript. You think you do, but you don't.

what is with the hate on noscript
im not that user, just curious on your opinion

Will Blizzard release vanilla servers?

>Chrome's rendering engine
>Firefox's addons
Avant and Lunascape.

You dont need a browser either, its just a favorable option.

>avant browser
Holy shit that thing is still around?!

>three rendering engines
It apparently became a giant load of bloat too.

>Chrome's rendering engine
why would anyone want that?

>edge
Winshits get out REEEEEEEEEEEE

Honestly I'd just like to have "Chrome but you can actually turn off the autocomplete in the url bar".

Where's that browser?

Opera

I tried Opera, still couldn't do it.

Chromium?

>Fast as Edge
Pejeet pls, pls.

Webkit + addons exists. If you want more addons port them or write them.
Edge is only fast because no addons.

Famous last words.

Then you're a literal retard. Use Firefox, it's better than chrome anyway.

>Download Edge AdBlock (28.9MB)
>(28.9MB)
kek

>chrome's rendering
Chrome is a piece of shit. It goes blank and goes on top of page randomly. I had kept it to visit porn sites that use flash but that is not the issue now.

edge fast as fuck

>edge still can't play webm but can watch apple live event

>not using the tracking protection list
wew

noscript makes firefox lag

One program to do html requests, one to view static html, one to run JavaScript, one to view images, etc. Etc.

>Firefox's addons

What did you mean by this? Chrome has a whole lot of extensions.

Nowhere near as many as FF does

Once FF fully adopts e10s, the old classic XUL extensions won't work anyway. Firefox will use WebExtensions, the same platform Chrome, Edge, Safari and Opera use.

developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions

>Once FF fully adopts e10s
Yes, we've all been waiting

Why haven't we found a way to apply the Unix philosphy to GUIs?

>you will never be able to pipe GUI programs into eachother to get a new GUI program.

It's rolled out to a rather significant portion of the users already. The problem is it doesn't work well with most addons so if you have an unapproved addon it will disable itself. All webextensions work with it but only a handful of others are approved. ublock origin is approved though.

I hate all things Google, hate it, the other 2 browsers probably "crash" all the time, and Chrome absolutely never does that.

But I hate them, so I can't wait till I get an iPhone and use Safari.

I know. Again, we've all been waiting (for FF to fully adopt e10s, as in, actually have it work with all extensions since that's the main reason to still use FF)

It will probably never happen because the addons don't work in a way that is compatible with e10s. If you want them you'll probably want to move over to pale moon

Qutebrowser

I actually just moved to ungoogled-chromium and learned to live without the addons it lacks. FF and its forks were always vuggy for me.

Tried chromium. Didn't have this and a few other add-ons

Even with the improvement in page load time, Firefox still has the better functionality, and the ability to customize the browser more to your liking

Two such browsers exists; surf and uzbl. The last time I used either, uzbl was the better of the two. I wouldn't bother with either unless all I did was go on bbs

Why such browser doesn't exist?
>Chrome's rendering engine
>Chrome's addons
>Fast as Chrome
Fixed it for you.

>that post
>IE in the photo
top kek