Why they wasted all this fucking space?

Why they wasted all this fucking space?

Other urls found in this thread:

duckduckgo.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Taht's where ads would be if you didn't block them.

Why do you want to read text at the edge of your screen?

a thread was pruned for this

get off your fucking computer and go outside, you do nothing of value with your time

>>a thread was pruned for this
what do you give a shit? If the thread is next in line to fall off the board, it's obviously lived to the end of its natural life anyway. If people were posting in it it wouldn't be about to be pruned.

Aham.

>Using Google

Oh, what is the new hipster better website now?

...

ASS-DEAD-DICKS

duckduckgo.com/

cool boys use this, it's [spoiler]shit as expected[/spoiler]

>go test it
>Sup Forums.com

but it respect your privacy :^)

>hurrrrr botnet meme

i think Sup Forums is blacklisted. i searched www.Sup Forums.org and reedid and 7chan comes first. pos search engine

>not using searx

>search engine that searches through other search engines and displays you the results
Literal clusterfuck, i might stay with the botnet anyway (since im using it anyways with searx and the isp/vpn provider has your searches anyways)

>not disabling every other engine except google
>not using dnscrypt
>he thinks his ISP can sniff HTTPS
gtfo goy

>using google

I know this term gets thrown around a lot here, but literally enjoy your botnet you idiot.

>using the botnet

>he thinks using https secures him from ISP browsing history
dude they know you visit a domain, so they have your browsing history, i know its not "as accurate" as normal http but they still know you visit shitloads of furry porn shemale websites you degenerate faggot

that's what DNScrypt is for you mongoloid
just shut up and go back to Sup Forums already

They used to offer a sidebar there.

Negative space is space

I mean, negative space is not wasted

>hurrr botnet meme

But they know the IP of the website you connected to.
Doesn't that make DNSCrypt next to useless?

...

...

Because some guy in the ancient times claimed the people have problem reading very long lines on text. Even ~80 characters per line is sometimes too much. Just look at newspaper what they do with the text flow.

Now imagine if they didn't set up maximum width and people with ultra wide monitors / 4K would have 1 line per 1 result so on the screen would be like 40 results.
>the efficiency would skyrocket
>mwf I just discovered how to improve google!
>not really, normies would be terribly confused with so many letters on screen, better use emojis only next time

Fucking jews.

it 5am here, can i pls stay inside ?

you got google or bing, what else is there because yahoo uses google now too.

god that would suck, hell reading text from the edge of screens already sucks

as for newspapers, take another look, allot if is is just formatting, not for users ease. it's hard to put in a 500x500 image at 150-300dpi if the article itself is only one line long.

Much easier to overlook a text if the words are closer to each other. Having every result on a single line would be retarded and decrease productivity

>not hacking google to suit your needs

For compatibility with 4:3 screens or 21:9 screens, the same time as with 16:9 etc

Dumb faggots that was so simple.

you can always tell a br shitpost from the grammar

>how to do thing?

VPN will fix that

...

lmao