Did you read your daily research paper today?
If you want to be anything more than a code monkey you should've.
Did you read your daily research paper today?
If you want to be anything more than a code monkey you should've.
Other urls found in this thread:
researchgate.net
web.stanford.edu
scigen.csail.mit.edu
s3.amazonaws.com
mit.edu
aclweb.org
db.cs.berkeley.edu
cs.cmu.edu
twitter.com
Lmao you're retarded.
I'm guessing you barely understood anything those papers said, did you?
>lel, look at how smart I am, guys! I can skim through papers!
Kick your bucket.
>implying I code
>should've.
*should of
Did you staple the papers like that on purpose?
Why would you print them?
>Yahoo!
>Google, Inc.
>not academic institutions
Opinion discarded.
I prefer reading on paper
Uni pays for printing anyway
no.
most papers are just wanks to get your doctorate.
if you actually wanted to learn something, you should have skimmed the source code and documentation instead.
>Did you read your daily research paper today?
I have.
I've also submitted my abstract for a talk to GTC 2017, hope it gets accepted.
>Sanjay
>on both papers
Jealous you will never be an Indian code wizard?
>he thinks author affiliation matters
The only think that matters is the conference or journal it's published in.
Actually I read that paper on the Hadoop Distributed File System last week.
seems like a dumb way to do things. I prefer gathering research when I start a project, rather than arbitrarily reading random shite.
>Computer science (((((research))))))
Nerds who are too retarded to pass a calculus course without shitting their pants aren't capable of producing meaningful research.
I'm reading this right now:
researchgate.net
(pic related)
How do you stay informed about the latest developments in the field over a longer period of time if you don't regularly search out new publications?
My Erdos number is 3
RSS feeds and checking aggregators occassionally for really interesting papers. But honestly I do work in too many fields to keep track of the research regularly, I prefer to just read the work as I need it.
For non-researcher this is pretty reasonable.
lol nerd
I get unvoluntarily bombed with so much information per day, I have more trouble cutting out the input stream of information, I'd rather not add an additional one there.
should have*
*ought to
I'm reading Stanley's NEAT from MIT 2002
pure maths is harder than applied fuckward
I've seen you post about this at least one other time over the course of the last month.
Do you seriously think you're hot shit for having skimmed a couple of research papers in the time it takes most academics to publish them?
>Do you seriously think you're hot shit for having skimmed a couple of research papers in the time it takes most academics to publish them?
Yes
>Ajay Mohindra
>Murthy Devarakonda
>Serafettin Tasci
>Murat Demibras
Are they working on the new loofinder app?
The first paper is from 1994 so no.
hi, this is Jon Google, founder of Google. We would like to hire you as a lead for our starting division of Advanced Faggotry as we need one more Infinite Retard like you. please send us your resume. [email protected]
No kidding. If user thinks author affiliation matters then they don't belong here.
Recommend some good CS papers
Pick your area of interest: computer systems, networks, security, etc.
Read the seminal papers in the area. Good introduction to main ideas in the field.
>web.stanford.edu
Dat abstract!
nty
>daily research paper
what a clown
Enjoy nor being a Googleista
My 6 figures are fucking awesome
Bumping the most interesting thread on Sup Forums right now
Is this a fucking joke?
how did these retards end up at stanford?
Affirmative action
briscoe sounds like a jewish surname tho
nah, I wrote one
yesterday i got notified that my paper had been accepted to a conference so i'm pretty pleased with myself. straight 4's across the board (out of 5; the median and mean for this conference were 2.6 and 2.5 respectively)