Trump will bring back jobs

>Trump will bring back jobs
>Hillary will bring back jobs
>Bernie will bring back jobs


topkek. You're all retarded. Srs. None of you know what's really coming. This will be on every fucking news and radio outlet soon.

oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf
youtu.be/7Pq-S557XQU
youtu.be/WMF-Z74C1QE

> manufactures will soon cause massive unemployment
> industrial revolution will soon cause massive unemployment
> nuklear energy will soon cause massive unemployment
My nigga. People will just move on to even more creative jobs, without need to waste life on something unefficient and boring.

Thats not how things work....
We are literally on the edge of completely unknown territory.
This problem will be the biggest issue our generation will face, remember i said this.

>look at me guys im regurgitating shit that's been talked about over and over again
>remember me

industrial revolution lowered the required skill to do a job and made it more efficient. it created a lot of jobs, terrible jobs, but it created them

>You will never be an edgelord merc defending the richfag masters from the impoverished masses

Remember when. They said the same shit 25 years ago? Wait, no you don't because you're barely 16.


>You

i don't actually have any numbers and i'm only speaking within the context of the US, but i feel like college educated people vastly outnumber the rest -- what will happen to the hordes of people working service/someones-gotta-do-it jobs (warehouse/cashier/retail/etc) when AI replaces them?

That picture with your reply. 10/10, would kek again.

Oh, no. Capitalism is destroying us providing technology advantages!!! We need to explore more humans, am I right, guys? #I'mWithHer

>People with bachelor's or higher outnumber those that don't have one
>In the U S of A

Didn't know this was a YLYL thread.

Man, you proved how white you are and how long you've lived in the burbs. Close to like 70% of Americans don't have a bachelor's.

...that's exactly my point? read slower

>i feel like college educated people vastly outnumber the rest
>Close to like 70% of Americans don't have a bachelor's
u wot

I don't think you read your own post....

>College educated vastly outnumber the rest

not really, I can't think of everybody living on their hobbies, +50% world population lives in extremly poverty

Yeah man, it's like 69% or some shit. College in the U.S. is set up so retarded.

Why is immigration a thing if all the jobs are going away?

I urge people to find jobs in the creative field as labor type work will become automated before work that needs the thought process of a human brain does.

>By the year 2000 we will have flying cars
>By the year 2000 robots will work in factories

These are real statements

Uh, that's why we need socialism? So people don't have to work to survive, because they won't have to.

All those caused a massive increase in the number of bullshit non-jobs to compensate.

Are you implying robot don't work in factories?

they do. but there's no incentive to modernize because everyone needs jobs in order to buy things.

>>We are literally on the edge of completely unknown territory.
As we were 20 years ago!
and 40 years ago!
and 10 years ago!
Shut the fuck up retard.

>Instill socialism in an automated society
>The most intelligent o society take the jobs as technicians, computer acientists and engineers
>The poor and stupid dont work but get money for being alive
>The poor and stupid breed like crazy while the intelligent and determined may not even reproduce
>The poor and stupid get more money for having more kids
>The poor and stupid can't get a job, are bored and want more so they start committing crimes
>People demand open borders so more poor and stupid can come in and live off the government
This would never happen! Its not like it's already happening!

Seriously. The one thing that can save the world is mass eugenics and mass genocide. It's the only way socialism could work.

I would answer this but this is Sup Forums and not Sup Forums. Don't want to upset anyone.

fuck off commie

Is anyone making a robot that programs microcontrollers?

Or you know, birth control and offspring restrictions based on contribution or intelligence. Or I dunno, maybe genetic engineering, making everyone intelligent regardless of parents.

Machines only replace low end jobs.
I work in aerospace (f22/f35) and we have a fuck ton of automation, but we still need a 1,000 to make parts.

Many jobs arnt able to be automated.
Also, the machines still need people running them.
Machines need mantience
Our CNC machines and Lazers break all the damn time.
Guys get paid $40 an hour to fix em.

In short, machines won't replace any semi skilled jobs

Kek this

Cont:
Now un skilled labor like fast food or Starbucks, ya those guys are fucked.

You can run an entire McDonald's with 1 dude with a basic understanding of machinist code.

whose going to make those robots? whose going to write the code? whose going to preform maintenance? People will. They'll just have to go to fucking school and not have some dead end job. Plus it'll be a long time before robots are generally cost efficient enough to replace a lot of unskilled labor anyways.

more girls in tech, means we need more males in tech...sux huh.

Socialism would work if there were incentives to not reproduce.
Like a massive one-off payment for sterilising yourself. If, say, you had a job as a technician and were making lots of money, you wouldn't need the money, and would eventually reproduce.

It has to be a one-off payment because a regular payment would be at the whims of politics and government. You'd be sterilised forever but the government could keep paying you at any time.
And if the sterilised become nigger rich and spends it all at once, who cares, they're not going to reproduce.

Wrong.

Why are you wrong? Because Jimmy the minimum wage worker is about 100x cheaper than mr roboto the automated worker.

>whose going to make those robots?
Other robots
>whose going to write the code?
Pajeets
>whose going to preform maintenance?
1/1000th of the number of people required to actually replace the robots.

>a long time before robots are generally cost efficient
Now this is a good point, since as robots replace jobs, there will be more unemployed, making their labour cheaper, and so making robots less economical.

What I really don't understand about a lot of trumpfags is how obsessed they are with his promise of making jobs.
I mean, a large portion of his campaigning was talking about how he wants to retain and even make more coal mining jobs. The issue is that coal mining just isn't need as much ad it was before. Coal is a harmful, inefficient, and unsustainable resource to mine and use, which is why we are trying to transition to different energy sources.
No matter how much you dislike this, you cannot deny that the future if energy is NOT in coal or oil. So knowing this, why force these jobs to exist?
As technology progresses job fields close and open up, and I think it's pretty obvious that the coal mining field is declining. Instead of being stubborn and finding ways to keep these jobs, wouldn't it be better to retrain the coal miners for a task that's actually useful to us?

I mean, we no longer need telephone operators right? There were probably many people upset when they lost their jobs, but that doesn't mean we should have kept those jobs. All they were doing was holding society back from progress.

All this AI and advanced robotics shit is just further proving my point. I think we are going to see many job fields closing up in the next few years, and instead of ignoring that, we should prepare by retraining workers in new fields.
History has shown us that technological improvements result in more jobs, and while I get the feeling this may be proven false in the very near future, that's all we have to go off of.

It's all economics. If mr Roboto can replace an entire staff apart from one; for example; 5 workers replaced with one robot. These workers cost $5 an hour, but 1 maintainer costs $10 an hour. You're saving $15 an hour.
For a 24/7 operation, we're talking $240 a day. If the robot costs, say, $100,000, it will start paying itself off in 416 days, and then it's pure profit.

What these numbers are changes the situation. So it's all economics.

Trumpfags are either idiots who don't understand the direct the world's heading, or they voted for Trump's stance against the establishment and media represented almost too well by Hillary.

What happens when robots are available, and more profitable, but we still exist in a purely capitalistic society. There will be a lot of suffering before people get around to changing anything, especially since the rich will have no incentive to change. That's what I'm worried about. We need a system in place before that happens to allow people the ability to not work if they aren't needed, and to work if they are needed.

Most high end robotic arms ex cost about 75$ an hour to run.
This is including the repairs and operator.
Lazers at my work cost $370 an hour
The 2 story CNC mill costs $over 1,000 an hour.
Most companies look at a return in Investment in 7 years.

Like what?

I'm not the user you responded to, and I don't have a concrete answer for you either.
BUT, what he said it's logical based on historical evidence. Throughout history, technological progress has always taken away a few jobs initially, bit then opened up many new job opportunities later on. It's impossible to predict what those jobs will be before though.

Well like I said it's numbers.
Robots are getting cheaper all the time.

Self driving trucks are going to be the big one. The economics there actually make sense, as compared to burger flipping.
When self driving trucks start hitting the road, hundreds of thousands of people are going to be unemployed within a few years. Possibly faster, depending on what the unions do.
Self-driving trucks man. GPS, remote monitoring, a fleet of trucks could be managed by a single person.

Yea, but as one of the videos of OP said, Cars took the jobs of horses, why do you think you are going to be different.

>why do you think you are going to be different
Did you even read my post? Apart from our own speculation, there is nothing to suggest that robots will take over all jobs.
Also, I'm not sure about you, but I am much more intelligent and creative than a horse. What happens to an animal is hardly indicative of what happens to a human.

>wheat thresher complains that no machine will take HIS job

You are more intelligent and creative than a horse, but not than AI.
Computers are superior to you in every way.
Just like cars are superior to horses in every way.