Fedora/Ubuntu 0-day

arstechnica.com/security/2016/12/fedora-and-ubuntu-0days-show-that-hacking-desktop-linux-is-now-a-thing/
>If you run a mainstream distribution of Linux on a desktop computer, there's a good chance security researcher Chris Evans can hijack it when you do nothing more than open or even browse a specially crafted music file. And in the event you're running Chrome on the just-released Fedora 25, his code-execution attack works as a classic drive-by.

>The zero-day exploits, which Evans published on Tuesday, are the latest to challenge the popular conceit that Linux, at least in its desktop form, is more immune to the types of attacks that have felled Windows computers for more than a decade and have increasingly snared Macs in recent years.

>While Evans' attacks won't work on most Linux servers, they will reliably compromise most desktop versions of Linux, which employees at Google, Facebook, and other security conscious companies often use in an attempt to avoid the pitfalls of Windows and Mac OS X. Three weeks ago, Evans released a separate Linux zero-day that had similarly dire consequences.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/hack
gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Hacker
firejail.wordpress.com/
pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/mbox/
ffmpeg.org/
bitbucket.org/mpyne/game-music-emu/wiki/Home
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>at the very least, desktop Linux is no more immune than Windows and OS X to catastrophic exploits.
Welp.

>in the event you're running Chrome
Joke's on them, I use Firefox. #SecurityThroughObscurity

Firefox is more vulnerable.

Proofs?

Please, stop posting tabloid shit.

>there's a good chance

>Linux
no kernel vunerability
fucking tech illiterates everywhere

also
>hacking
someone tell ars that it's called cracking
fucking tech illiterates everywhere

install firejail, problem solved

its not that linux is perfect, but windows literally is more vulnerable because the OS is designed like shit from the ground up

requires libgme a.k.a Game Music Emu

en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/hack

How is the verb hacking used wrong in ars article?

>its not that linux is perfect, but windows literally is more vulnerable because its used by more people

umm could you not? the way you are using "hack" is very triggering right now. please educate yourself

gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Hacker

chrome vuln != linux vuln

shut these fake news niggers down asap

0-day for 0-userbase.

Did you firejail the gnome thumbnail programs and the gstreamer libs? That's where the vuln is.

If linux is so good then why can the OS panic itself?

>I use Linux
Ur a nigger....

Chromium has a sandbox, default Firefox has nothing. You can remedy this by using Firejail or Mbox as a sandbox

firejail.wordpress.com/
pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/mbox/

Mbox is "more secure" using ptrace but it's slower because of it. There's also nothing stopping you from running a vanilla kernel.org kernel that matches the GrSec test patch version and at least using MPROTECT and other basic mitigations.

If you want an incredible secure OS outside of Hardened Gentoo or SubgraphOS then you want Windows with sandboxie and EMET. Last couple of years they put significant OpenBSD protections into their kernel stack (which is why they donate money to them) and they're all on by default, no custom kernel or knob twiddling needed. They (MicroSerf) also paid a shit load of money for manual auditing according to the guy who used to run matasano, and they formally verified all their drivers with proofs of correctness to avoid crashes and exploits.

tl;dr if you're a pleb, Windows (w/Sandboxie + EMET) is the safest OS you can use.

>ctrl+f gstreamer
>1 match
>ctrl+f linux
>14 matches

it's like Sup Forums cares more about os wars than tech, huh weird

>NIGGERS

>Chrome
lmao

A dictionary written by a committee of non-experts appointed by fucking no one has no business in writing definitions for expert topics.

The asstechnica still can hire them.

>Chris Evans
Didn't know that ginger twat could even use computers

which is a dependency for basically ffmpeg and hardware video acceleraton libraries. So mpv, vlc, totem, blender, vdpau , intel/mesa-va drivers, the list goes on.
libgme0
Reverse Depends:
libgme-dev
libgme-dev
libavformat-ffmpeg56
gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad
xmms2-plugin-gme
qmmp
mpd
libavformat-ffmpeg56
gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad

Shit-tonnes of software depends on libavformat-ffmpeg56.

Already patched on Debian and probably the rest as well.

Linux is often considered more secure? Why?

>I don't know know how dictionaries work
And yet you give your opinion. We'll done.
This just in, all software ever made is vulnerable to some extent.

You just need to not use a DE that would touch those files

I.e.use dwm and gtk2 only

Gnkme-tracker and gnome totem is shite

DESKTOP FAGS BTFO

> Proofs?
JUST FUCKIN' DOWNLOAD THE FILE AND EXECUTE. THE PROBLEM ISN'T THE BROWSER, dumbass

~ pacman -Ss libgme
extra/libgme 0.6.0-5
Video game music file emulation/playback library

~ pacman -Qi ffmpeg
Name : ffmpeg
Version : 1:3.2.2-1
Description : Complete solution to record, convert and stream audio and video
Architecture : x86_64
URL : ffmpeg.org/
Licenses : GPL3
Groups : None
Provides : libavcodec.so=57-64 libavdevice.so=57-64 libavfilter.so=6-64 libavformat.so=57-64 libavresample.so=3-64 libavutil.so=55-64
libpostproc.so=54-64 libswresample.so=2-64 libswscale.so=4-64
Depends On : alsa-lib bzip2 fontconfig fribidi glibc gmp gnutls gsm jack lame libavc1394 libiec61883 libmodplug libpulse libraw1394
libsoxr libssh libtheora libva libvdpau libwebp libx11 libxcb opencore-amr openjpeg2 opus schroedinger sdl2 speex
v4l-utils xz zlib libass.so=5-64 libbluray.so=1-64 libfreetype.so=6-64 libnetcdf.so=11-64 libvidstab.so=1.1-64
libvorbisenc.so=2-64 libvorbis.so=0-64 libvpx.so=4-64 libx264.so=148-64 libx265.so=95-64 libxvidcore.so=4-64
Optional Deps : ladspa: LADSPA filters [installed]
Required By : aubio audacity blender chromium ffmpegthumbnailer ffms2 mpv-light obs-studio
Optional For : alsa-plugins audacious-plugins gegl02 youtube-dl
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Installed Size : 28.08 MiB
Packager : Maxime Gauduin
Build Date : Wed 07 Dec 2016 12:47:48 AM EET
Install Date : Wed 07 Dec 2016 11:53:26 AM EET
Install Reason : Installed as a dependency for another package
Install Script : No
Validated By : Signature

not on my machine :^)

it's a gstreamer exploit

so yes, there's actually a pretty good chance as far as desktop linux is concerned

does more or less matter when we're talking about hundreds of millions of users in both cases

>libavformat-ffmpeg56
is that library vulnerable or something???

>Chromium has a sandbox, default Firefox has nothing.

>about:support
What's the Chrome version of this?

the Ubuntu exploit isn't working on my machine.


anyone got this working? how?

try chrome://about

you need an outdated Ubuntu
it was fixed yesterday

FREETARDS BTFO

Pwn2Own 2016 didn't even add Firefox to the list this year because breaking out of their "sandbox" was considered too easy, only IE and Chrome(mium).

The FF pdf viewer is also a massive attack surface even with 50.9+ version.

>breaking out of their "sandbox" was considered too easy
no, nobody can hack firefox. this is why they don't even try to attack firefox

>there's a good chance security researcher Chris Evans can hijack it when you do nothing more than open or even browse a specially crafted music file
And how would I open or browse this specially crafted music file? I have NoScript and don't listen to random soundfiles on random websites...

>While Evans' attacks won't work on most Linux servers
I run Debian stable, which is considered a 'server' so...

>We'll done

Not here:
[CODE]# emerge -s game-music-emu

[ Results for search key : game-music-emu ]
Searching...

* media-libs/game-music-emu
Latest version available: 0.6.0-r1
Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
Size of files: 167 KiB
Homepage: bitbucket.org/mpyne/game-music-emu/wiki/Home
Description: Video game music file emulators
License: LGPL-2.1

[ Applications found : 1 ][/CODE]