What does Sup Forums think of the GCC compiler?
What does Sup Forums think of the GCC compiler?
Eli Taylor
Other urls found in this thread:
Justin Peterson
pretty comfy
David Flores
Just the computer or the entire toolchain?
Nathaniel Evans
Compiler*
damn autocorrect
John Bennett
Be careful OP, that image could start a flame war! I sure hope that wasn't your intention!
Jackson Lee
You posted the outdated version.
Benjamin Roberts
The compiler.
Owen Morgan
GCC can produce some pretty well-optimized binaries, so I'd say it's nice.
Also, that's a troll image, right? The chances of a single board (/lit/) having an average of IQ of 147 are pretty low. IQ is normally distributed, with an average that is 100 by definition (that is, even if humans become significantly smarter in the future, the average IQ of everyone on the planet will always be 100). The chances of multiple boards having multiple standard deviations from the mean as the average IQ suggests that either the image is fake or the study was taken with an extraordinarily low sample size.
Angel Gomez
Sup Forums still a bunch of idiots.
Eli Morris
>140+ average
I like how all this data is from online IQ tests.
Luke Johnson
>It's just weighted random posts
its_fucking_nothing.dbx
Jacob Barnes
llvm is way better.
Once again GPL btfo
Gavin Parker
>/lit/ over /sci/
Joseph Morris
Please stop tripfagging, this isn't reddit.
Jacob Watson
...
Juan Howard
deprecated by clang
Liam Russell
>intellectually privileged
Now, which /lit/ tumblrite crafted this garbage?
Evan Russell
used to be shit but it's decent enough now on mainstream platforms
still don't trust it for weirdo platforms like sparc/sgi-mips/ia64 though
Dylan Gutierrez
I don't have a Reddit account. I just tripfag here. Deal with it, user.
Ayden White
...
Carson Bell
suffices for too
but no seriously, I think GCC is OK
Lincoln Sullivan
I hope no one actually thinks these are real
Justin Hughes
Nah user, the average IQ of [s4s] is totally 161.
Adam Thomas
The text should make it obvious to anyone, especially the last portion.
>don't argue against "scientific fact"
>no, the scientific method doesn't rely on rigorous scrutiny, shut the fuck up peasant
>and stay the fuck out of our boards
also
>Double Digit Club
It's cute, I guess
Zachary Gomez
C'mon, /mlp/'s not THAT bad.
Hunter Bennett
Objectively inferior to Clang
Nathaniel Smith
It's a political compiler instead of a useful compiler.
youtube.com
Brayden Morgan
Where the fuck is /po/?
Nicholas Nelson
Why would you do that? Just let them tripfag and filter all tripfags.
I wish more people used trips.