Nvidiots on suicide watch

nvidiots on suicide watch

youtube.com/watch?v=fkvj-uij42M
4k demo capped with vsync on

Other urls found in this thread:

videocardz.com/65343/amd-demos-star-wars-battlefront-on-ryzen-and-vega-at-ces2017
youtube.com/watch?v=WYWlnJ8dCLQ
youtube.com/watch?v=G_n3wvsfq4Y
scalibq.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/john-fruehe-amd’s-latest-and-greatest-liar/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

>GTX 1080 already gets 60FPS

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

...

...

videocardz.com/65343/amd-demos-star-wars-battlefront-on-ryzen-and-vega-at-ces2017

>The framerate was reportedly dropping to 57 FPS from time to time.
>Nvidia maintains 60+FPS all the time even on a DICE engine which is well known to be biased towards AYYMD

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

>videocardz.com
nuff said

Nolan?

>biased

>proof of completely opposite one post above

The CPU isnstill 3.4? They'd do better with a OCd quad core

it was vsync locked

DELET!!

> 57 FPS
> locked

Its a 4k monitor of course its vsync locked, they dont make higher refresh 4k screens yet

>being a fanboy

haha

immediately and thoroughly rekt

hehe

In the Vega demo they're showing gameplay walking a mostly empty map without any action going on at all

reviewers like
use a much more demanding sequences
>Using Fraps we recorded 60 seconds of gameplay from the training mission on Endor titled ‘Chase’. The benchmark begins once the Stormtrooper has mounted the speeder bike and takes pursuit.

So the FPS obviously isn't comparable

AMD as always cherry picking benchmarks

are you retarded? it's a ceiling. it's not fucking magic.

youtube.com/watch?v=WYWlnJ8dCLQ
This is the exact benchmark sequence that tpu uses. Doesn't take a genius to see that AMD's demo sequence is significantly easier to render

shit thread

t. AMDcuck

>not understanding basic tech
>posting on Sup Forums
sounds about right

doesn't mean you can't run a game at higher fps

>this damage control
Nvidiots are literally holding back tears of BUTTfrustration.

it takes a special kind of retard to discredit the same map

But it's pointless

depends on monitor input lag, some 60hz TN panels have it very low(under 2ms) so shoving more frames eliminates delays

>using battlefront as a benchmark

Either you're trolling or you've never played the game before. Yes, its the same map. But there is a vast difference between strolling around in a circle vs flying through the map on the bike. More mem bandwidth will be needed to stream in all the textures and render geometry with the fast changing scene

It's just like when they demo-ed battlefront during the Ryzen demo where all they showed was a scene which was literally 90% empty space.

Can't really blame AMD since it's marketing's job to cast themselves in the best light possible. But I'm just saying that you should expect at least 10% less performance under real world gameplay/non cherry picked benches. Always keep in mind that AMD has a long history of over-promising and under-delivering.

holy shit who knew that! because we all know that canned benchmarks are actually the real deal eh

youtube.com/watch?v=G_n3wvsfq4Y

>AYYMD lies about Barcelona performance

scalibq.wordpress.com/2010/08/31/john-fruehe-amd’s-latest-and-greatest-liar/

>AYYMD lies about Turdozer performance

AROUND AYYMD, NEVER RELAX

nvidiot is so much into damage control that goes 10 years back to find a flaw

Bravo

>Unironically believing Vega is going to destroy 1080

My sides are in orbit.

""""""""""proof''''''''''''''''''''

>Every reviewer uses same methods and options of benchmarking

Subhuman Pajeet go drown in a holy river or something.

It will destroy a 1080. It probably won't destroy a 1080 ti.

>$600 for this
HOW CAN NVIDIA EVEN COMPETE

damage control

As long as AMD continues to have shit drivers and software, Nvidia will always BTFO AMD

Drivers ain't shit, but are feature rich and buggy.