Let's settle this once and for all, Sup Forums: Manjaro or Antergos?
Let's settle this once and for all, Sup Forums: Manjaro or Antergos?
Levi Myers
Other urls found in this thread:
sourceforge.net
lists.archlinux.org
twitter.com
Jordan White
that's arch
Luis Torres
just use arch/parabola
Sebastian Sanders
arch
Jaxon Butler
Antergos
Jaxson Sanchez
I like Antergos, others like Manjaro.
It scarcely matters.
Lucas Price
arch
Liam Morgan
>Arch
Nod an argumend :DDD
Austin Gonzalez
Arch
Julian Richardson
>no 32bit image for antergos
into the trash it goes, I need muh 32 bit support for old shitboxes
Andrew Myers
Between those 2, antergos. It still uses arch repos, and it's fairly easy to undo all the "antergos mods"
Jose Clark
Agreed.
Having a motto like "for everyone" without 32 bit support is extremely ironic.
Colton Stewart
...
Dominic Carter
gentoo
Jackson Lopez
>which is better, shit version of arch or shit version of arch
>get mad when told to just use fucking arch
Aiden Gray
I've never used Antergos but I assume Manjaro will have the same printer problems because of the stupid fucking package manager.
Oliver Gutierrez
>not using Arch anywhere or reading the wiki
Lucas Turner
>doesn't answer the threads question properly
>doesn't understand that Arch is not an option
>still says "Arch"
>thins I'm mad
Wew, lad.
Cooper Davis
WINDOWS 10
Noah Rodriguez
EBIN XDDD
William Sanders
Antergos.
Christopher Lopez
>install Manjaro
Everythin just werks.
Cooper Jones
Arch
Justin White
Arch anywhere
Blake Bell
...
Jonathan Martinez
Kawaii
Julian Gray
...
Henry Smith
I use the last i686 install disc (minimal)
It still works, but you have to refresh the repos before starting the install.
When it stops working I'll join the Manjaro side of Arch.
Hunter Powell
what the fuck is the point of using either of them? why do they even exist? for what purpose?
Andrew Thomas
There's also the Architect installter, which IMO is still the best option and works without any problem even though it's quite outdated
sourceforge.net
Aaron Collins
The answer is simple, user: MALGA - Make Arch Linux Great Again.
Angel Perez
>womanjaro
>can'tergos
Liam Sullivan
>womanjaro
What does that even mean?
Jeremiah Cox
i686 support is in the process of being dropped. The only hope is that you get a team put together that will support it as a secondary architecture.
lists.archlinux.org
Evan Kelly
Gentoo
Michael King
Fuck.
I hate being poor.
Jeremiah Rivera
>works without any problem
sadly, that isn't true.
i couldn't do a LUKS encrypted install on t420. when booting, it didnt find the root partition.
Brandon Reed
what about 32bit wine? will it work?
Cameron Diaz
Get real Arch, niggers.
Joshua Lopez
I'd assume it will continue to be built for x86-64 using the multilib repository as it is now.