he fell for the "HEVC is always better no matter what" meme

> he fell for the "HEVC is always better no matter what" meme

> shittier files when they are low bitrate compared to high bitrate x264

> almost every sperg uploading 200meg files pretending they are better than 700+ meg x264 files

This thing is a proper codec but only if the file is big enough or if you must go extremely low file size. It is not better on very low file sizes compared to x264 on large file sizes/high bitrate.

Furthermore, when the original source is x264, only a sperg would believe any kind of encoding could improve it.

VLC + HEVC = Master Race

There's no such meme

I don't know anything about this stuff.

Is AV1 going to be better than this?

there is for the last ~1 year. there is a flood of torrents of shitty 200meg files pretending they are great for 720p or even higher.

they are shit compared to 720p or 1080p on 800meg+ on x264.

they are only good when the internet is metered.

They do seem to compress HEVC a lot these days.

what a bunch of niggers, well it's to be expected from fagsubbers

Really? Is this like a YIFY thing?

That is actually pretty high for a 24 minute how.
A movie with those hevc specs would be 5-10GB.

give it time

i remember when x264 came out they where doing the same 300-1000mb reencodes and this was almost 10 years ago

File sizes will only grow with the average speed of the internet and that really hasnt changed in over a decade.

Hell here in ausfailia we've gone from 25mbit in 2003 give or take to 25mbit or less in 2017

>1 hour long movie
>Not even FLAC but AAC
>Unplayable on anything but a pc
>Still get banding out of the ass
Literally what's the fucking purpose

Is sallysubs the new bloatgirls?

Download the bd-remux and encode it yourself

>FLAC
you're right on the rest

Don't expect faggots who fell for the latest gimmick like HEVC to actually know how to fix banding.

>Not downloading from PSA or UniTeam
Okay

inb4 HEVC with zstandard instead of huffman coding

doesn't HEVC use some sort of adaptive arithmetic coding instead of huffman?

x265 is supposed to be same quality at half file size

so it would only make sense to encode it at half the bitrate.. but most people encode it at much lower than that.

Hevc is only shit because most old GPU hardware doesn't support it directly

More like 75% of h264 at 480p-1080p (and slightly better at 4k).

The thing with HEVC drama is that it is biased towards some really divisive psychovisual tricks - some people are inclined notice, while others won't.

Typical are posterization artifacts h265 relies on heavily to compress into low bitrate while looking "crisp". At a same bpp, x264 would sure band a bit too together with ringing, but overall you could still see a gradient on surface where there is supposed to be one, instead of a weird, out-of-place, cartoony opaque blotch.

ah

I noticed that backgrounds are much blurrier on h265 too, stuff that is out of focus on purpose in a movie...