ITT: We see who has the fastest boot time on Sup Forums
I'll start
ITT: We see who has the fastest boot time on Sup Forums
I'll start
>over 10 seconds
You must be using an ayymd cpoo
Startup finished in 2.066s (kernel) + 1.322s (initrd) + 3.381s (userspace) = 6.770s
>systemd
am i being trolled or are you seriously this dumb OP?
you won.
systemd boots faster then other init systems due to the fact that it's a huge back door so it can use the cloud to serialize personal information leaks.
what do I win
...
>Startup finished in 4.839s (kernel) + 38.770s (userspace) = 43.610s
shit
Startup finished in 2.499s (kernel) + 1.700s (userspace) = 4.200s
Also known as "parallelization".
Startup finished in 1.828s (kernel) + 790ms (userspace) = 2.619s
What are you niggers doing?
reminder that if you aren't using EFI it doesn't take your post time into account
A free suicide
DUDE
what's wrong with systemd?
autism
>man
>85% of the boot time
da shit?
Also, how?
very carefully haha
no other init system can parallelilize boot processes. you need a multi-megabyte binary compiled from a million lines of code to do it.
i tried
Nevermind, I don't care.
you trippin dog
Startup finished in 3.927s (firmware) + 4.969s (loader) + 8.634s (kernel) + 16.641s (userspace) = 34.172s
At least it doesn't take actual minutes to boot lmao. I'm guessing booting from an SSD would make the biggest difference?
I suck
>Startup finished in 5.874s (kernel) + 17.053s (userspace) = 22.927s
Startup finished in 1.991s (kernel) + 1.111s (userspace) = 3.103s
>all these ubuntufags with sub-3rd world boot times
Startup finished in 5.801s (kernel) + 12.221s (userspace) = 18.023s
reddit.com
Yes. People using a HDD will have noticeably slower boot times than people using an SSD.
Startup finished in 2.601s (kernel) + 898ms (userspace) = 3.500s
Startup finished in 13.298s (firmware) + 1.966s (loader) + 2.141s (kernel) + 1.859s (userspace) = 19.266s
601ms dev-sda3.device
378ms systemd-journal-flush.service
239ms systemd-journald.service
223ms NetworkManager.service
What am I doing wrong? This is with a SSD already.
Startup finished in 1.937s (kernel) + 12.338s (userspace) = 14.276s
how can i run this program on windows?
you need to rename system32 as systemd and delete the contents of the folder so that systemd can initialize on reboot
delete system32 xdddddddddd
ok thanks guys, gonna reboot and report back with startup time
Any way to measure boot time with OpenRC?
tfw fell for the SSD meme
>all these non-UEFI fags
It doesn't take into account the firmware part.
i'm not replacing my mobo just so i can see how many microseconds it takes to get through it
Startup finished in 3.076s (firmware) + 39ms (loader) + 1.692s (kernel) + 770ms (userspace) = 5.578s
I could shave off 2 seconds if I instructed the BIOS not to wait, but then if I needed to get into BIOS I would have to mash the key like a retard, so meh.
Don't ask that to people who hate systemd, not even they know why they hate it.
If you'd look at the fucking output you'd see it's all spent in your MOBO's firmware. Go into the settings and make sure that fastboot is enabled.
systemd-analyze: command not found
I don't know, OP.
Startup finished in 11.262s (firmware) + 179ms (loader) + 2.660s (kernel) + 2.141s (userspace) = 16.244s
~> systemd-analyze
fish: Unknown command 'systemd-analyze'
Oh well.
Server: Startup finished in 2.072s (kernel) + 11.132s (userspace) = 13.204s
Main PC: Startup finished in 2.297s (kernel) + 1.318s (userspace) = 3.615s
Startup finished in 2.749s (kernel) + 687ms (userspace) = 3.436s
Spotted the old sysadmin neckbeard wizard
>fish
wew lad
Of course, creates boot time thread and uses debian system for first post. /s
Startup finished in 3.701s (kernel) + 47.943s (userspace) = 51.645s
Do I kill myself now or later
...
Startup finished in 1.805s (firmware) + 18ms (loader) + 6.813s (kernel) + 713ms (userspace) = 9.350s
I just placed a 500gb ssd in my laptop today.
It's blazing fast but for some reason the kernel takes ages to load for me.
Does anyone know how to trim it down? I already checked dmesg to see if I could find an issue.
debian based?
No. Running a fresh Arch install.
This is my only machine that takes this long to load the kernel.
that's weird
probably some specific kernel module that it's loading
openrc can just dosent by default
I already guessed so. That would leave me the choice of recompiling the kernel every time just for a couple of seconds faster boot times or live with it I'm afraid.
How do I get this program?
Startup finished in 1.811s (firmware) + 2.668s (loader) + 1.220s (kernel) + 3.706s (initrd) + 25.892s (userspace) = 35.299s.
9.344s systemd-udev-settle.service
8.686s dev-mapper-fedora\x2droot.device
4.739s firewalld.service
4.380s udisks2.service
4.104s lvm2-monitor.service
3.445s systemd-journal-flush.service
3.018s lvm2-pvscan@8:10.service
3.017s chronyd.service
2.761s rsyslog.service
2.685s multipathd.service
2.511s systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service
What do I win? It used to be double that.
about 30 seconds, 22 of which is thanks to >x58
5.5 seconds.
Do I win?
...
Shit has me beat by like half a second.
Fucking ThinkPad firmware is too slow.
wut distro u runnin gurl
Startup finished in 53.149s (kernel) + 1min 28.780s (userspace) = 2min 21.929s
Got an external EMC array with 20 disks hooked to this.
Any way to speed it up?
>systemd
Switch to Linux I guess.
Systemd-analyze blame
arch but it's lame
install macOS
de/wm??
openbox + tint2
that artist... i can't even.
he/she draws girls as cute as buttons, but there's a lot of what in between
>9.485s NetworkManager-wait-online.service
How'd I do?
oh fuck mate post PS1?
any ideas on how to install OSX on a precision 3510 with switchable AMD graphics ? it's stumped me for the last few weeks. Cant even get to the first apple logo on screen
you might just be out of luck, sorry
google your exact model + hackintosh and you might find a guide
i did, and everyone laughed at the idea of OSX on swicthable graphics :( annoyingly it works fine when i pull out this firepro MXM card, but the firepro is the only reason i would want to hackintosh it anyway, dead end
>running OS X on AMD
Kek
you realise you can run OSX on AMD hardware right ? just not on switchable accelerator style GPU's
haha moron
no bullying
My system takes 25 seconds between the POST and the desktop fully loaded. I'm using an HDD btw
user is right, hackintosh is no probs on AMD hardware as long as its a discrete GPU and the integrated GPU has nothing to do with it. currently running a hackintosh at work with an i7 4790s and an R9 270, using AMD/ATI injection in clover, works fine, native 1280x1024 at 75hz
>R9 270
>1280x1024
lol
i knew you would like that :) it's at work, where im a computer systems engineer, where combinations like 4:3 monitors and old gaming cards and hackintoshes are a normal thing. please dont go thinking this monster hackintosh is my personal rig
You're fucking slow.
get on my level, kohai.
based on those numbers hers is faster
post the full output
>over 20 seconds
fuck off, jack
that's it. I run LUKS so the time when I have to type in my password is also counted.
I also mount a bunch of external volumes as well.
this is an i7 Skylake with an SSD. it's fast as hell.
yeah well based on those numbers it's still slower, and you aren't even showing kernel, firmware, etc times
sorry kid
>[email protected]
>715ms vs 40ms
lol
loool, that moment when an actual professional walks into Sup Forums and starts fucking neckbeards in the ass :D
It looks like gnzh theme from zsh.
Do you even know what that does, you stupid cunt?
it goes slow in ur case xD
shrekt