systemd-analyze time
Startup finished in 4.606s (firmware) + 4.625s (loader) + 8.078s (kernel) + 3.536s (userspace) = 20.847 s
Is that pretty decent for a shitty netbook?
systemd-analyze time
Startup finished in 4.606s (firmware) + 4.625s (loader) + 8.078s (kernel) + 3.536s (userspace) = 20.847 s
Is that pretty decent for a shitty netbook?
better than mine
Startup finished in 6.043s (firmware) + 8.930s (loader) + 2.934s (kernel) + 2.827s (userspace) = 20.735s
You mean worse than yours by ~0.1s?
The savings on your kernel time is nuts though.
im using a newer one that might help
4.8.13-1-ARCH (antergos, MATE)
Startup finished in 5.794s (kernel) + 11.654s (userspace) = 17.448s
Cheers m8
Windows takes 8 seconds faggots. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH. Stay in your knock-off OS.
You should have seen this thing when it was running Windows. More like "it was crawling Windows."
What use is fast startup time when it's not reliable?
Startup finished in 174us (firmware) + 3.550s (kernel) + 8.646s (userspace) = 12.197s
>things you're used to hearing from your step-son's mother
...
...
Looks good bro thanks for the feedback
...
...
...
...
In case it's not evident, it's hung at that state.
See:
Na-ah, it really is that bad.
Yes, it shaved two seconds of the booting time but is takes an additional 90 seconds to shutdown now. Net loss 88 seconds.
inb4 shutting down doesn't matter, like you give a flying fuck about that 2s gain on booting.
>systemd
Found your problem
Startup finished in 3.577s (kernel) + 38.692s (userspace) = 42.270s
what do i win
what a fine deskop
Exactly.
ty
Autism of the Year
With feeble uptime like that? Nothing. You get nothing.
>leaving your computer running when it takes less than 5 seconds to boot
lol
Do result include grub multiboot options wait time?
Also, who cares about startup-speed, a unix-like isn't supposed to be rebooted like you would Windows to "fix" problems; if you're running on a laptop, use suspend/resume.
no
No what?
>if you're running on a laptop, use suspend/resume.
no
literally who cares about uptime on anything but a server
>literally who cares about uptime on anything but a server
truly this
If you're on a laptop use suspend/resume because it's even faster than systemd supposedly is - not because of the uptime, you fucking retard.
no
So, you want systemd because it lets you get back to shitposting faster, but you refuse to use ACPI STR thats demonstrably a faster method? Gotcha.
i dont even use linux anymore BAAAKA
and if i did i still wouldnt care
STR isn't system specific you utter fucking moron. Holy shit, how do you even manage to breathe, given how stupid you are?
didn't read
If you don't care, why did you post.
>screenshot 04/2016
>Currently 01/2017
How about you post your current boot time macfag?
theirs no systemd on macOS