So, Iridium or Firefox/Aurora/Nightly?
So, Iridium or Firefox/Aurora/Nightly?
Other urls found in this thread:
aur.archlinux.org
twitter.com
Waterfox
>implying I use Windows
Waterfox is available on Linux and MacOs as well I believe.
Vanilla Firefox is 64 bit compiled by default on Linux. What would even be the point of Waterfox?
Nightly.
No Mozilla optional botnet, removed bloat, and is a but faster.
But Iridium is the same thing for Chromium, though.
ungoogled-chromium
won't build for me
Tough shit, linuxfag.
what distro? they have repos for all the buntus and Suse.
Arch
Iridium built just fine
>joining the German Federal Police Botnet
Look at all those doctors, lawyers, and scientists Germany is importing in
So, what ISN'T a botnet these days?
It's shit if you use extensions that update semi-regularly
could be an issue with the pkgbuild settings. Chromium source moves fast. I honestly prefer iridium anyway.
aur.archlinux.org
It's something I noticed before I tried, but it failed for me as well. It's broken on Arch I guess.
Firefox Dev Edition. Disable the fluff (Pocket) and you're gold.
is there a severe memory leak in the latest firefox? this shit gets to like 6gb of ram (i have 8 total) after just a few hours with like 3 tabs open.
probably a glitch with e10s. works a lot better in the development versions.
Try dumping your extensions and importing your bookmarks into a new profile before you blame Firefox. The problem is user additions like 99.999% of the time.
Nightly is the wrong way to Firefox. Use ESR.
ESR is a huge step down from Developer and Nightly right now. Firefox without e10s is unbearable once you're used to it.
Personally Waterfox or a Firefox but I use Iridium as a secondary. Test both and take your pick. I love customization so Firefox bases are for me.
Iridium
Opera
>removing botnet to get into another botnet