NEW RYZEN 1800X BENCHMARK

>The Turbo for the 1800X was DISABLED and the chip was running at 3.6GHz throughout the test suite

wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-8-core-benchmarks/

>Ryzen @ 3.6 Ghz Single Threaded Performance – 4% Higher IPC Vs. Broadwell-E

>4% Higher IPC Vs. Broadwell-E
So basically like Skylake?

LOL AMD 2015 PERFORMANCE IN 2017, that's a last gen architecture BWAHAHAHAH

>poointhelootech
But whatever, let it be so.

Wait, so it's basically Haslel without integrated graphics?

Amazing job AMD!

>$300 8-core processor comparable to a $1000+ intel one for $300

AMD will release Ryzen with integrated GPU, just for people like you!

It's also more energy efficient.

So when you correct for clock speed you're basically at Skylake levels of performance. It's impressive, not so much from a sheer performance standpoint. But a cost-to-performance standpoint. $175 will get you roughly 7700k performance, or $320 will get you 6900k performance. The 4 core/4 thread chip doesn't make a ton of sense unless you really want to cheap out. With the Hexa core and Octo core being the biggest bang for the buck.

Ryzen's big calling card isn't the low end, but how close it can get to the top tier Intel stuff while costing 1/3 the price.

>hurr its only marginally ahead of intel
>ignore the fact that its a much cheaper chip

>Intelshills already on damage control
Enjoy your """"""""15%""""""""" """""improvements"""""

...

the Intel's 69xxK and 59xxK don't have iGPU tho...

...

...

>Shabylake is just Crylake with MOAR HURTZ
>Frylake was launched 2015
So if AMD is 2015 intel
And Intel 2017 is essentially 2015

AMD and Intel are tied?

So Ryzen single thread pref at 3.6ghz puts it right below the 6800k. The 3.6ghz 6 core will most likely have almost exactly 6800k performance.
The 7700k at 5ghz will be more expensive than the 6/12 ryzen chip but in the majority of games it seems like it will outperform it.
If you don't game and want ryzen for compute this isn't really relevant, but you know that.
I was considering selling off my 6600k and picking up a 8/16 Ryzen but unless you're interested in recent AAA titles that scale well on threads like Watch Dogs 2, Gears of War 4, etc that would be a mistake.

My guess is that Ryzen will disturb the poverty to low range market with ~2500k performance at $100+ddr4, the HPC/Compute market with it's crazy pref/$ but that the i7 7700k will still be the ideal chip for the majority of people who play games.

>counting L2 and L3 together
Fucking stores.

nah, don't sell your 6600/7700k cause I'm sure ryzen suck on gayming

>but that the i7 7700k will still be the ideal chip for the majority of people who play games.
>350 dollars
>as opposed to 320 for twice the number of cores with near the same single core performance
Sure, if you upgrade every year like a tool, then maybe you'd go for the i7

Remember: A GOYIM IN FEAR CHANGES SOCKETS EACH YEAR!

>skymeme IPC
>CPU is actually soldered
A socket a year keeps goyim in fear, actually.

This is a case of "The chicken or the egg?"

Goyims are already in fear.
Therefore, they change sockets each year.

That makes no sense?
Even if I could buy a i7 6900 for Ryzen prices the 7700k would be the better choice. The 6800k is generally inferior to the 7600k too. This is of course assuming you already know what game you play and are not concerned about straight up compute(ie workstation).

I suppose it is obvious that you're not trying to have a discussion though.

Rider > Saber.

Call me when we get non blog spam sources.

A living specimen of shabbos goy. What a wonderful sight.

>quad core CPU
>2017
>superior

Really gets the noggin joggin.

>this is what Intel expects people to believe

It's okay, maybe Zen+ will be worth buying for the majority of people.
I specifically mentioned watch dogs 2. I don't play AAA though. None of my games scale past 4 cores.

>intelfag: I'M THE BEST
>AMDfag: NO I'M THE BEST

Plebs arguing over Plebs things.

Get on my level and join the true master race.

>implying 1game out of a million that supports more cores is worth it

Not gonna lie, former Intel supporter here. It's hilarious watching them crash and burn like this. But in all seriousness we can't let this company get their hands on the source codes.

shitposting: the post

Literally 90% of modern games profit from moar corez.
You would be retarded to choose an overpriced quadcore with little overclocking headroom over a $80 cheaper 6 core.

So instead you buy the i5 priced 4c/8t one, how is this that difficult to comprehend. The only reason the Intel 6c would be "inferior" is if you're running stock clocks.

>Log into brockerage account that you forgot about for 2 years.
>Find 380 shares of AMD you bought in 2013 for $2.59 per share and forgot about
>it's $13.13 per share now
>analysts predict it rising to $24-$26 per share by the end of the year

o boy I can make a high end custom loop liquid cooled pc with all this money.
But

The 6850K, 6950X, 6900K, and so on don't have integrated GPUs either.

And their APU ones are coming H2 2017.

>ignoring the Watchdogs 2 poster
Sure, if you you play some indie ass games, its a good idea to go get the best Single core performance processor. But the Supposed difference between Ryzen and kabylake Single core performance is far too negligible to warrant the purchase when you take everything into consideration.

There are too many unknowns about Ryzen to count out its single core performance for an overclocked skylake refresh.

If you can honestly justify getting half a CPU for an extra 30 dollars, then please send me your money, because you have too much disposable income for you own intelligence.

>But

But what, user? BUT WHAT?! ARE YOU OKAY?

he is dead now.

RIP sweet user

You people (gamers) would rather buy a quad core with 3% higher IPC IN SYNTHETIC TESTS, NOT GAMING BUT SYNTHETIC, instead of a 6/8 core with a lot more cache?

You know that synthetic difference won't even amount to 1% in games, right? No game hammers a single core with just FP

o. I think I meant to say "but I'm going to leave it in there since it's expected to double what it already is". That's $988 I put in and if it hits $24 a share that's $9,120. wew I need ludes now

Kabylake is a step back faggot.

what's worse is the L3 is victim cache so you only get 12MB effective.

Single thread pref is bad even oc

This is clear server design, which is fine.

It's more like 20%, Zen is close to Haswell and there's a 15% difference between haswell and kabylakle

Brian no.

Guys guys you're missing the point..

How good will Ryzen be at mining cryptocurrency? That's what matters.

No it doesn't.
And also for a CPU it will be just fine.

Also it doesn't matter.

>Zen is close to Haswell
Why brian?
You meant to say it's as good as Bri(an)lake.

this is too high

tfw intel ia legitimately doing maximum damage control now

Your small mind cannot even comprehend the power of VIA.

VIA it's not only the future of x86 but the world.

>witcher 3 UHD
What the fuck? I was playing that the other week with an 8350 and r9 Fury and was at 100% GPU at all times with the CPU staying at ~50-60% at most. I was getting 30fps at 4k and could get >85 at 1080p. It's far from a CPU bound game.

Is this because of the sli or something?

No one makes serious ITX machines.

It's not even "indie ass games". It's like almost every single game that isn't city skylines, gears of war 4, or watch dogs 2.
Almost every single top played PC game would be better served by a 4/4 with superior single threaded pref to a 8/16, even if it's marginal.

>forgetting about something you paid $984 for
I don't believe you.

...

yes, you were GPU bound

>passmark

It's "A socket change a year keep the goyim in fear", you fucking jobber.

>Almost every single top played PC game would be better served by a 4/4 with superior single threaded pref to a 8/16
dx11 era is finished. multi cores will rule.

what the fuck

You play AAA games for like a few hours then they're done. The games worth playing on PC don't scale with threads.

It's all the same shit, 8 core or 4 core with slightly higher clocks, but what's good about the 8 core is that when you encounter a situation when you can use them, they'll be bring a nice increase.

INTEL BTFO

>The games worth playing on PC don't scale with threads.
but they will. engines are built for many cores now. vulkan and dx12 changing the scaling problem.

you think GTA VI won't scale? come on now.

>paying 3 times for same performance

It seems there's a bottleneck in your picture. That test is shitty with the GPU bottlenecking probably.

it's a new instruction, only Ryzen and 7700K are optimised

Lol? 980 is a great GPU.
And no TitanXP or P6000 will bottleneck shit.

But don't Zen 6 cores start at $230 and 8 cores at $330?

WCCFTECH.

Those faggots need to stop spamming.

The nice thing is being able to run the game without any bottlenecking from the CPU, while also playing 10 windows of porn on your other monitor, and recording it at good quality, and so on, all at the same time.

And there are some games that do use more than 4 threads, or 4c/8t. Especially games that you can heavily mod.

Hell even Cities Skylines benefits from 6core in huge cities.

multithreading is only possible if developers are willing to implement it. Given that most "gamedevs" nowadays can't even program in high level languages and churn out unoptimised shit because they know how to click on a few tools in an engine, i don't have high hopes for the "low-level api advantages" of dx12 to be realised anytime soon.

what is this picture lmao
theres no way that woman is only 3 feet

>AMD

LOOOOL
Sorry I'm not buying Sandybridge IPC in 2017

even chrome will eat 8 cores

980 is perfectly fine, but not for fucking 4k.

If it's at half the price why not

A 2500k still does everything you want

i see

It's almost hilarious how you guys refuse reality.

>980 is perfectly fine, but not for fucking 4k.
if you want to play AAA trash all the time

my 980 handles all my games on 4k just fine including Overwatch

those retards use engines that are pre made, and most engines are supporting dx12, vulcan and their optimizations.

INTEL STILL BTFO

>The Turbo for the 1800X was DISABLED
Nope, just not detected.

Also, Passmark is joke benchmark, the only thing worse is superpi and CPU-Z.
Wait for real benchmarks from reputable sites.

>buying AMD so Chrome can do faster spying on you

Thanks for telling me to not buy AMD

so you are willing to game at 41fps and lower, Im not, and I sure as fuck am not turning graphic settings down for hardware based aa resolutions.

Never seen haflings or what, pleb?

Everything's a botnet. Now get your tinfoil hat ready.

>he thinks $300 8 AMD halfcores can beat a $1000 Intel

Intel is the industry standard with 90% marketshare and 99% marketshare in servers, AMD is a joke company run by indians

You should be using based Pale Moon anyway.

well an 8 or 10 core intel will likely allow even faster spying

Furry moon is slow.

Nah, the real joke is Intel fanboys failing to see the storm coming.

Intel is beaten by a joke, what a great punchline.

Victim L3 implies mostly exclusive of L2 you dumb nigger.

...

Dumb cuck believes these benchmarks are legit