/wbg/ - Web Browser General

This thread is for the discussion of anything regarding web browsers and search engines.

Question of the thread:
What web browser do you use and why?

Other urls found in this thread:

directory.fsf.org/wiki/IceCat
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/umatrix/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/privacy-settings/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/random-agent-spoofer/),
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-js-fixer/).
github.com/dillbyrne/random-agent-spoofer/issues/283,
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/decentraleyes/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-resource-uri-leak/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-canvas-fingerprinting/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/https-by-default/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pure-url/).
addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-search-link-fix/).
keepassx.org/).
12bytes.org/articles/tech/firefoxgecko-configuration-guide-for-privacy-and-performance-buffs
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

To all you guys that use Firefox now, will you use it after the addon switch?

>What web browser do you use and why?
I use Firefox because I'm used to it.

Botnet Chrome because it's fast and i don't care that Google knows what porn im watching

Have anyone tried QupZilla here? How is it?

It's pretty good, although it has issues playing videos here and there.

I might switch off until the essentials are back in, but the change will be good in the long run. I only use 3-4 addons anyway, so don't plan on using something else for long

Same here, the only addons i use are ublock origin and https everywhere.

>https everywhere
I'm using uBlock, Greasemonkey and Stylish. Since they are some of the most popular I'm sure it won't take long until they are adapted.

Can you redpill my what addon switch ?

Which lightweight browser does Sup Forums recommend for Android? I want multiple sessions but I don't like using Chrome's incognito because of the "Click to close all incognito sessions" notification.

this

firefox

werks

why firefox nightly is considered to be the best version on all these charts floating around?

Because it's multiprocess, stable enough, gets updated quickly and it isn't botnet.

Lightning is pretty good.

how accurate is this

> (OP)
>To all you guys that use Firefox now, will you use it after the addon switch?
If 'old them3 restorer' stops working... I don't know....
I don't want to use Chrome, that cunt.

I use Firefox and I'd like to know if there are any good tutorials for umatrix.
I would like to block anything possible to block regarding google, facebook and other socials outside of their own fucking website.

Opera have everything I need
>adblock
>bookmark synchronization
>doesn't rape laptop battery
>free VPN
>supports chrome extensions
but most importantly...
>doesn't crash every 10 fucking minutes like chrome or fagfox

Depends, do you use your web browser to browse the web? Firefox is pretty awful at browsing the web, even compared to Edge, and especially compared to chrome.

I'm gonna copy this over from the sqt because I feel it fits better here: I'm finally trying to take back my privacy and ditch Chrome, but there are so many firefox versions and forks to choose from. What are some pros and cons of the notable ones?

>Opera
>This app contains a unique ID that is linked to your device. We may also use this ID to collect information about the features you use and how often you use the app. We aggregate and anonymize this data to debug and improve the app and our services, and measure marketing campaigns.

Firefox never crashes for me, is it something related to how many extensions and script you have?

>Opera have everything I need
>Opera have
>have
>chink shill education level.
This is a protip, if someone can't use linking verbs or conjugate verbs properly while defending something they are either genuine idiots or shills

I use safari on my mac and I heard good things about the technology preview. Any opinions on switching to that or webkit nightly?

Ice cat

>no reply
>not even one from someone telling me that Korbo isn't a fox but a wolf

Move Icecat down to excellent and then it's perfect.

Its both the same retard

-Firefox is good in general.

-Waterfox is a tiny percent faster than Firefox, no real reason to use it over Firefox.

-Pale moon is basically Firefox but with the old UI, and it will continue to support current extensions even after Firefox switches to web extensions.

-Nightly is multi-process and gets faster updates than Firefox, but can be unstable at times.

That's about it. I don't think there is any other Firefox version/fork worth noting.

>icecat
>cutting edge
HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

I juse Chrome botnet.
Runs best for me.
I don't care about open source
I don't care about botnet
It just works

the rules are each category must have a max of 4 browsers

And who made those rules?

Is Iridium completely ungoogled? Also is it the same level of "cutting edge/unstable" as firefox nightly or more/less stable?

It's basically ungoogled-chromium but with a different name.

Wiki when?

no
>no privacy issues

IceCat is god tier and you all going to worship the god when Mozilla goes webextensions.

IceCat is a great browser, but it isn't cutting edge, so it shouldn't be in god tier.

I wanna give Vivaldi a try.

I understand where the confusion comes, but is not just a fork.
directory.fsf.org/wiki/IceCat
>IceCat is not a straight fork of Firefox ESR; instead, it is a parallel effort that works closely with and re-bases in synchronization on the latest Firefox ESR as the upstream supplier, with patches merged upstream whenever possible; although it should be noted that additional security updates are customized to IceCat occasionally.

Top security oriented addons:

(Cross-)Site Request, Anti-XSS, Trackers, Referer, Cookies: uMatrix (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/umatrix/).
Security Settings: Privacy Settings (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/privacy-settings/).
User-Agent: Random Agent Spoofer (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/random-agent-spoofer/), (User-Agent JS Fixer addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/user-agent-js-fixer/).
Plugin Enumeration: Disable plugin enum (github.com/dillbyrne/random-agent-spoofer/issues/283, see Mechazawa script).
Content Delivery Blocker: Decentraleyes (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/decentraleyes/).
URI Leak: No Resource URI Leak (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-resource-uri-leak/).
Canvas-Fingerprinting: Canvas Defender (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-canvas-fingerprinting/).
SSL (strict HTTPS): HTTPS by default (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/https-by-default/).
URL Deobfuscator: Pure URL (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pure-url/).
Google Redirection: Google search link fix (addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/google-search-link-fix/).
Passwords: KeePassX "autocomplete" (keepassx.org/).

>re-bases in synchronization on the latest Firefox ESR
>Firefox ESR
Not cutting edge.

>confusion
Are you a GNU damage control bot?
It's a fork of ESR that gets security updates. It is not cutting edge. It will never be cutting edge. Maybe in a few months when ESR gets upgraded to Firefox 52.

Stop defending it because there is also nothing wrong with IceCat itself. It is just not cutting edge.

Read again.

Troll detected.

You do realise that Firefox ESR is old software by definition right?

You don realize that is not vanilla ESR we are talking here right?

Like come on.

You are absolutely right.
It's even less bleeding edge than ESR.

Your EDITED picture implies a lot of shit. Why don't you tell use what shitty browser you are shilling instead so we can laugh at you.

I use firefox stable.

I am disappointed though, I thought you really had a point about icecat being cutting edge but the fact that you think I edited the picture activates my almonds into believing I've been rused all along.

Check here 12bytes.org/articles/tech/firefoxgecko-configuration-guide-for-privacy-and-performance-buffs

I am done with you fucking troll.

Naked Browser Pro (NB Pro)

>To all you guys that use Firefox now, will you use it after the addon switch?
I don't see why people autisticly screech over this
We just won't have to make firefox specific versions while developing addons
Sure people who invested in the previous api will bitch about it like this guy who made all these tab management plugins but i don't get why more browser standardization is a bad thing.

Some addons can't exist with the new API, that's what devs are concerned. Apparently current addons have access to more resources than what they will get with webextensions.

Just my 2 cents here.