Less than 24 hours after the election of London's first Muslim mayor

Less than 24 hours after the election of London's first Muslim mayor
youtu.be/cLc8saJYeVU

Other urls found in this thread:

politics.co.uk/news/2016/03/30/sadiq-khan-there-are-too-many-white-men-on-transport-for-lon
youtube.com/watch?v=rfqAkUXKT5Y
elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>even in London, muzzies burn American flags

Proof that all Bong posters are kebab, because they are O B S E S S E D

The number of whites in London is getting to be a real problem

>Burning the USA flag
Just another day in office

>Burning Israel flag
They're dead

No.... NOOOOO

Is that real? It is, isn't it?

Yep
politics.co.uk/news/2016/03/30/sadiq-khan-there-are-too-many-white-men-on-transport-for-lon

I don't even know what to say tBh.

This is just too much

He's referring to the Board of Transportation, and in the article he says he's mainly concerned with funding the board's committee to combat sexual assaults on transit and getting more women in the office, not more brown people

Most snackbars don't want to put women in charge of anything. He's a SJW, not a terrorist.

Jesus, this is too much. I'm so sorry, London.

The fact that these scumbags aren't brutally murdered in the street by a mob is a testament to how cucked and neutered the Western world truly is.


We are so fucked.

>mob justice is acceptable when those dastardly muzzies hurt my fee-fees
>freedom of expression, but only for ideas I like
kuffars are adorable

>freedom of expression

Which is exactly what these "people" are marching against.

When they have "ideas" that fundamentally go against my country's values and society, they are enemies and should be treated as such

Fuck off Ahmed you piece of shit. Go back to Pakistan

AHAHHAAHHHHHAAHAHAHAAAAAAA

Even if they got what they wanted and everyone converted (returned, whatever) to shitslam, they still would stay a guest to modern world.

If churchill would've seen this future he'd join the axis in an instant

didn't hitler somewhat ally with the muzzies, though? he at the very least started burning jews at their behest, wasn't he just going to deport them all originally?

why isnt sharia banned yet? the fuck?

>be british
>pay jizya

I must save London

this sjw mindset is pure cancer and will lead to the fall of the west. it's time for Londoners to wake the fuck up seriously

Ally yes, let them conquer europe? No

I just find it hilarious that even muslim countries such as Turkey, Algeria, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, etc. wouldn't tolerate this sort of shit (i.e. Pakis coming in and trying to push durka durka jihad all over the place). And yet Britshits do.

Hitler was pro-Islam.

USA liberation of the UK when!?

I also dont hate islam. I just hate that its here in the west

true, but if churchill saw a future of muslims, why would he ally with hitler, who wasn't genociding muslims; rather, somewhat allying with them?

What are those flags they are carrying?

ahh yes my brethren, inshallah, the prophet mohammeds teachings must not be skewed by the infidels!!

Their aims may not be the same but in tandem we get the same result

snackbars end up winning because SJWs push white men out of power and the void is filled by the alpha conservative Islamic culture

>We don't want freedom, we want Islam!

what the actual fuck

How is it possible to lack self awareness this hard?

I'm sure you'd be the first in the street to brutally murder them, friendo.

Rightio.

Well, do you think western europe would face the fate of islamization if hitler succeeded?
There is your answer

seriously. Where the fuck is the IRA when you need them? They could be doing something productive, but instead they are too damn busy being Irish.

>Well, do you think western europe would face the fate of islamization if hitler succeeded?
why wouldn't they? if anything the muslims would love it even more since the jews were gone, the holy land is theirs, and the west seems to have something in common with them; a common enemy.

> The IRA hate the English
> The English are in trouble
> The IRA aren't helping the English
> This confuses the American

Cant tell if troll or retard

looks like the IRA doesn't see the bigger picture...

Next London election is called "Reconquista".

>Islamics wanting Islam
>Islam means submission

Dude, when one of the words that define your religion group means that... they won't accept anything differently.

> Terrorists don't see the bigger picture
boy what a surprise

>Trump will lead the 10th Crusade against the Caliphate of Al-Londonistan and restore British rule to the city within your lifetime.

pls respond

well it's not like them being nonwhite was enough of a detriment in and of itself, muh japanese honourary aryan bullocks.

just canadian, disregard their posts

what are they up to

Almost all of Hitler's comments on muslims was in high regards. He actually admired them.
Hitler basically said he wished Europe was Muslim but since it wasn't he had to encourage the local religion: Christianity. He wasn't Christian at all, and actually thought it was inferior to Islam.

If you are looking for the Sup Forums perspective on muslims look up General George S. Patton's thoughts on muslims. They will be much more to you liking.

>all this butthurt

Why is everyone worried? This is obviously a desperate gasp from Labour. London, one of a few Labour strongholds left in the UK has desperately elected a Paki as mayor of London for lack of better options. Is this really a surprise after they went with someone like Corbyn to lead the party? Their desperate bid to try and outradical the SNP to win back parts of Scotland and fire up the youth will end in terrible failure due to the infighting its caused in the party. It's all a matter of time.

Standard black islam banner with the shahada written on it

haven't watched the video but if its a black flag with sharp white squiggles then its the black standard/shahada

basically jihad: the flag

>Islam ensures a loyal faithful wife under your control, strong patriarchy, and the death of the SJW regime

why are we resisting this again?

as conservatives shouldn't we be happy the cucks are bringing about their own demise?

This isn't pol, fuck off back to your containment board

Not when it also results in your own demise.

Because our goal is not to defeat the cucks but to preserve our culture

kill yourself Sup Forumscuck

Sup Forums is now and forever anti-mud

>penis>brain

?

There is no demise, Muslims don't have anything against white men. We can step into rank

>Muslims don't have anything against white men

sure buddy

...

ANZUS liberation soon brother. The metropole will be retaken.

>Brain

Who has a fucking brain in this country? The idiotic lefitst "progressive" shitheads who are completely fine with importing masses of people hailing from the most patriarchal and oppressive major ideology on this planet? I don't think they do, personally. I think I live in a Western world fast approaching madness, and I'm looking for a way to stay above the water myself you mega cuck.

Fucking idealist progressive leftshits and their ivory tower complexes.

There's never been any real case of it. Muslim conquered white territories like Bosnia and Chechnya simply converted. ISIS actively recruits white male converts. It isn't a race-based ideology.

>Implying I don't want a strong independent woman.

>Foregoing the values of the Enlightenment, the Greeks, and by extension the Sumerians and Egyptians, the values that brought the West to dominance, that carry the torch of liberty in a dark and unenlightened world, that brought about art, literature, music, and scientific wonders the likes of which the world has never seen before.
>Because it's easy.

...

........

We should get rid of ours and LIBERATE the town of London

>giving a fuck about europe now

Who here will fight in European Race war? I'm sure many Australians will fight to purge the plague from the motherland

>easy

Easy? Inevitable. Society isn't a regular continuum of progress and we've had setbacks before.

Not even trying to be Sup Forums but it's a patent fact that after women gained the right to vote, and then a majority of the electorate, we've seen an introduction of foreign and domestic policy elements that have eroded our senses of defense and nationality and as a result the West is going to get flooded with a ton of different-minded people.

What is your idea of a "solution" to prevent this? There isn't one that doesn't involve violating the liberal principles you're alluding to.

Anzac day pt2 when?

I hardly think we can attribute most of the recent problems with domestic and foreign policy in the West to women being able to vote.
I believe we should be blaming "think tanks" and special interest groups that push this sort of shit.

>after women gained the right to vote
Correlation isn't causation, you dipshit. Could you perhaps consider that being more tolerant and accepting is what caused women to be allowed to vote in the first place?

>I believe we should be blaming "think tanks" and special interest groups that push this sort of shit.

This, also representational democracy is an outdated form of government.

At the very least more issues should be put to the public in the form of referendums, so you don't end up with a Merkel scenario where the leader of your country decides to resettle a million "refugees" because she wants muh humanitarian legacy ("If you didn't want one million more Muslims why did you vote for me several years ago? :^)")

Well a huge part of today's problems actually come from a media and political elite that seem hellbent on improving overall economic growth, even at the imperilment of the peoples that they lead. Society as a whole seems to be pushing back against this kind of thing, and we can use our liberal principles to vote people into power. If not, then those same principles, forged in the Enlightenment and tempered by the American and French Revolutions, guide us to overthrow an unjust and tyrannical government.

Only if such an effort fails does the fall of the West become truly inevitable. As things stand, there is still plenty of time to turn things around, and indeed things do seem to be turning.

KHAN'D

I'm inclined to agree. The best form we have in place, the Westminster system, is too easily corrupted. I mean UKIP won 1 million votes and could hardly win a seat in parliament while the Sottish nationalist had the same amount of votes and won 30.

>surrending your national policies to supranational interests
holy shit

europeans are this retarded.
holy lel

kys yurocucks.

til australia is in europe

I'm entitled to my view of it faggot. The possibility exists and with the way the vote goes I'm inclined to think it's been a major factor. Women are not generally as pragmatic and make pathos based decisions. That can be fine and all for, say, being a mother, but not for deciding on the course of an entire country's future with regard to a very hostile world.

til what?

>all that Allahu Akhbaring for managing to burn a flag

Truly, this is the greatest muslim achievement of our time

>>Correlation isn't causation, you dipshit.
women vote overwhelmingly leftist in every single western country
I mean like a 70-30 split on average.

>"I feel there is this to blame; even if there were many other factors that contributed to this to happening, I will settle on the one that I like the most, and you are wrong for calling me out on my tunnel vision."
It's funny that you seem to dislike women for being illogical when you're being exactly that.

see And they are the ones throwing the biggest bitch fit about the mere idea of staying the flow of illegal immigrants into this country, as well as refugees in europe

I'm not being ridiculous at all, you're just being contrary, excuse me for making a simple observation while you try to reconcile your idealism with reality

best post itt desu

Is it part of it? Absolutely, because women do tend to vote more liberal, though I'd like specific stats on it because iirc it's more of a 60/40 split, and depends on the country, but regardless. Is it the sole, unique, only reason? No, and the fact that women were given the right to vote at all (and men gave them this even when they weren't forced to helps cement this.

The point is there are many reasons for it happening, not all attributable to women (and, hell, it's still almost entirely men in government positions, not women, and they make the rules and decide what they want to do in the end, especially since modern democracy tends to lack specific referendums. The point still remains that there are many different factors that created this, and you centre on one, and only one, and claim it is the sole or even biggest reason when there are many others, such as which is notable because people pushing their victim mentality on other people is a massive problem. Bonus points that the feminist movement did precisely this back in the suffrage days, and men allowed it. So how, again, is it purely women's fault, and not also men who want to be accomodating?

youtube.com/watch?v=rfqAkUXKT5Y

Of course there are people like this, too, but I'm not sure how common they were back in the day.

>surrounding your national interest to gommies and drug lords
Latin Americans can't be this retarded

>colombia
>gommies
lol wut

>drug lords
they're simply bussinessmen and entrepeuneurs in a illegal bussiness, which americans made illegal, forcing them to become violent.

nice try straya cunt.

fuck off, colombia is america's greatest south american ally
they're the most anti-communist country in the americas after usa

MMP
M
P

But yeah first-past-the-post is a shit system

elaborate pls

Australian education, ladies and gents.

Alright, I'll retract my comment about gommies taking over Columbia. But communist and socialist have had a constant presence in the region for many years, usually along with disgusting levels of populism and corruption.
Drug lords had had too much power in the region and if you claim it's only illegal because America says so, then you've been cucked.

they're losing their grasp because everyone is realizing how shitty socialism is
people in countries bordering colombia sneak into colombia to buy shit at grocery stores

First past the post is a voting system which is very all-or-nothing. In each riding (geographical group separated for voting purposes) there is a representative of each party on the ballot, and the constituents (people who live in the riding) vote for the party they want in power. Thus, the candidate with the most votes in that riding will gain a seat in the House of Commons - parliament, essentially. The total number of MPs (members of parliament) in the House of Commons dictates which party ends up ruling the country, and whether they have a majority or minority government, with a majority government being able to push their decisions through more easily due to less opposition.

Of course, an inherent problem with this system is that, even if a party has lots of votes, if it does not have enough to beat the top choice of other constituents, they do not get a seat, even if it's extremely close. This is the problem that they're talking about, the one UKIP faced. Another thing of note is that you don't need 50% or more of the votes to get a seat, either, just the most votes compared to the other candidates.

This does mean, however, that it is easier to get a majority government, so a government can get things done more easily - in effect, it's inherently less democratic in the interest of getting more things done. Make of that what you will.

Nothing to do with English politics, but weedman wants to change the system to proportional representation, I'm eager to see if he actually does it.

elections.org.nz/voting-system/mmp-voting-system

tl;dr you get two votes, one decides how many seats each party gets in parliament (out of 120), the other decides who gets your electoral district's seat (like a congressional district).

>For example, if a party gets 30% of the party vote it will get roughly 36 MPs in Parliament (being 30% of 120 seats). So if that party wins 20 electorate seats it will have 16 List MPs in addition to its 20 Electorate MPs.

bro, socialism is dead since the last elections.

Maduro will be out this year, Ecuador is falling apart, so their president said he won't be into the next period, Argentina choosed a non commy president, brazil impeach her president.

All the major commie countries will stop being commies next period.

Imagine something like the EU but in lat, and forcing socialims over all countries.

no thanks.

>Proof that this was from today
>Proof that this was in Europe/London

404 - not found

Sole reason? No, major, and easy to define. I understand there's more to complicate it but I'm not going to write at thesis on Sup Forums, as the subject of discussion was the West's interactions with the rest of the world, and Islam in particular, a large distinction is that we grant women a large part of our decision making process, hence my illustration of it as a key factor, which I still stand by.

dw guise its just angry pakis that make us all look bad