Why is Sup Forums so excited about Ryzen

If you guys claims are true about not playing any videogames?

Do you think trump plays tetris?

???

We play games, we just don't talk about it so we can tell fucks to go back to Sup Forums if they do :^)

we dont, thats why we're excited. ryzen is shit for gaming but good for real work

Because Sup Forums to tech is what Sup Forums is to kino. Bunch of edgy contrarians and shitposters who hate everything that's popular while shilling for their favorite, preferably unknown or disliked by many, choice of tech/director. And so DC universe and Snyder are superior to Marve.. Oops I mean AMD is superior to Intel/Nvidia and clearly everyone who disagrees has a shit taste.

Because paid marketers are an actual thing, not just a boogeyman to use when you're losing an argument

...

Everyone plays games time to time. Also Ryzen is more of a competitor to X99 than consumer chips, so gaming wasnt exactly the primary concern. You can game on an old toaster CPU if you want anyway.

Here's what I want to know.

What are the facts?
What conclusions can we draw from them?
What conclusions can't we draw from them?

Everything else is irrelevant.

Ryzen 3 without smt is cheap as fuck

a great i3 or i5 replacement

Because Intel is a botnet

It would definitely destroy an i3 in everything but single threaded (i3's have good single threaded performance, it's the only thing they're good at)

AMD has this problem too though

Half the board doesn't play videogames, the other half is Sup Forums.

Intel is a bigger, more popular company, and is thus more likely to be in bed with the NSA.

I don't, my computer is for video games and by extension can do any other task.

It's just autism rage filled fags that get upset about the mention of video games. You can discuss Linux and hardware in the same board you know.

>Sup Forums is one person
LOL NO

I want faster compiles.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Are you fucking retarded?

>games are all a cpu can be used for

>games are all a cpu can be used for
99% of the time, yes. For browsing, listening to music and watching films, you can use a toaster.

There are a few special snowflakes of course with 'muh video editing' and other lies, but nobody believes them.

This board is full of autistic (mentally) underage gamers.

*Compiles behind you*

>fact
Ryzen beat the Cinebench WR

>conclusions we can draw
The single-thread performance is on par or better than Intel's, or the SMT implementation is better.

>conclusions we can't draw
That every chip will OC as high as Intel ones.

This

t. Gentoo man

this
exists for talking about games
keep that shit out of Sup Forums

shh

don't tell him people do actual work on computers, you'll scare his fragile mind

Why would you buy an 8 core processor for video games?

>muh actual work

You can't even browse the ''''''''modern''''''''' '''web''' without a beast of a CPU

Are you implying that video games are the only use for new processors?

>compiled languages

The 80s called

I browse the web with a Core Solo regularly.

How's the lag :^)?

More bearable than your shitposting.

Guess my next build will have AMD CPU.

Because i do a lot of 3d rendering you fucking goy

because i bought 1900 dollars of shares in amd today. i need you to buy

>Ryzen beat the Cinebench WR
You forgot to mention the liquid nitrogen part.

welcome to 2017, the age of dx12, vulkan and generally reduced cpu overheads.

>because i bought 1900 dollars of shares in amd today. i need you to buy
unironically this

The previous record was on LN2 too, I don't get your point.