Where did it all go so wrong for AMD?

Where did it all go so wrong for AMD?

Here.

Ryzen is looking like they're right back on track though.

More cores. Forward looking, sure but way too soon. They're back on track thanks to ryzen and now they have experience and r&d into more cores right at the right time. Intel's tick-tock has hit the wall and they're going to be playing catch up now

when intel shilled so hard stores sold inferior intel cpus exclusively.

Core2

things were going pretty well up until 2006, when it turned out Phenom was slightly behind Core arch.

then Bulldozer was even further behind Sandy Bridge, and the gap grew ever wider as AMD scrambled to make Zen.

in the meantime, Nvidia was getting its shit together with the Fermi refresh which took even more revenue out of AMD's hands.

it didn't help that the company was being mismanaged like fuck up until Lisa Su and Raja Koduri took over. bad acquisitions (like fabs that they had to divest not longer after building them, buying ATI might still pay off though), bad gambles (surely all devs will start writing concurrent software!), etc.

we love to blame Intel's shady deals for AMD's downfalls, and that surely did some damage, but in the end, the company was steered wrong.

>Forward looking
Fuck off with that meme. They knew what they were doing, they know they had shitty cores and they had to do more cores as their only chance. Do you seriously believe they are stupid as Sup Forums, that they haven't thought of that? Jesus fucking christ. How Sup Forums is so stupid. I can't fathom it sometimes.
PS. They do exactly the same today. Their shilling benchmarks are all purely 100% multithreading.

has shilling ever been so obvious, nice copy pasta kike.

You misspelled Intel

>yfw the entire industry will implode thanks to the end of moorez law

>chips won't get smaller but they'll get faster and cost insane amounts of money

>quantum quantum quantum

>Where did it all go so wrong for AMD?

Sandy Bridge and Bulldozer.

Are you literally mentally challenged? The whole shilling you do today is ONLY on 16 thread VS 12 thread CPUs. That's the EXACT same scheme they used last time because they KNEW their single core performance was shit.

Surely buying ATI must have paid off by now. The amount of net income generated through discrete cards and the hardware for 2/3 of current gen consoles must be huge.

you and your "associate" posted the same pasta at a similar time and one of them got deleted.
Also, you clearly haven't been paying attention to the Ryzen 7 series, IPC is better than all of intel's lineup.

That was me you retarded piece of shit. It had a typo. Jesus fucking christ, you are both stupid, and retarded.

if you went back to fix a typo why didn't you go back to fix the grammar of the poorly written pasta.
fucking moronic shills.

Intel and AMD shills out in force today

Oh silly ignorant goy.

Amd faildozer made r&d prioritise the following subjects:
Faster clocks (like those you can see in piledriver unlocked fx series thx to the low ipc of faildozer)
Improved schedulers (thx to the low ipc of faildozer)
Improved branch predictors (thx to the strange faildozer bp)
Improved l1, l2 and l3 conectivity and lower latency overall (thx to the not coars but modules faildozer had)

Hector Ruiz and Dirk Meyer

go back to your desktop or phone threads

Intel and illegal marketing/partner practices. Sure they were illegal but the punishment was nearly a decade later after Intel made more than enough to cover legal costs. Typical monopoly tactic.

Meyer was a great engineer but a poor executive.
Ruiz was a decent engineer but an even shittier executive.

Lisa Su is the first decent leader AMD has had since Jerry Sanders retired.