2068

>2068
>still impossible to change workspace with a gesture in Linux
Why are we falling behind on shit like this?

Arch update corrupted my neural processing unit again. Really doesn't get the artificial neurons firing any longer.

>tfw you have to use GNU/Linux or the not done yet GNU Hurd, because everything else BTFOed by Linux.

>2068
>still no browser file picker in Linux

install opensuse with KDE

>19874
>the kernel still doesn't include a DE

>install cancer with supercancer

no. the fucking lazy devs should include this feature already in Linux. fucking niggers I could get a pajeet to do a better job at a Linux distro than these overpaid white devs.

I'm not a medic, so i can't help on you.

install ubuntu mate

In most DE you can switch desktop with a simple scroll. It's been like that for more than a decade.

Linux is a kernel; it doesn't have workspaces.

What gesture?
You mean like moving your mouse in a shape of some magic figure to move to next workspace?
Why would anyone use that?

ever heard of a touchpad?

Ever heard of a keyboard?

it works with kde.
I am sorry that you want to use a tiling window manager and complain that stuff isn't there on the linux desktop, but it there is a lot of stuff available, a lot of desktops, a lot of features.
Saying there is no way to do a thing is almost always wrong.

>a GESTURE

>41st millenium
>pajeet still doesn't poo in loo
wew

He's just retarded. X11 has support for, you might need one extra package, gestures, and any decent WM/DE should be able to handle them as input events.

KDE can

KDE can do any of this you know

>muh lightweight DE

It's not even that bad. Stop using garbage for a computer. If your machine can run Windows it can run KDE just as if not easier.

Sup Forums seems to think there isn't a fully functional DE out there for Linux because they dismiss KDE because of memes

KDE is pretty bad since 5, but it got hella fast at least. Most of the fault is in the plasma portion. kwin is stupid good on all fronts.

this is possible on gnome

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

>TFW 6'2 tall big frog guy mode

I'm terribly sorry for interjecting another moment, but what I just told you is GNU/Linux is, in fact, just Linux, or as I've just now taken to calling it, Just Linux. Linux apparently does happen to be a whole operating system unto itself and comprises a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Most computer users who run the entire Linux system every day already realize it. Through a peculiar turn of events, I was misled into calling the system "GNU/Linux", and until now, I was unaware that it is basically the Linux system, developed by the Linux project.

There really isn't a GNU/Linux, and I really wasn't using it; it is an extraneous misrepresentation of the system that's being used. Linux is the operating system: the entire system made useful by its included corelibs, shell utilities, and other vital system components. The kernel is already an integral part of the Linux operating system, never confined useless by itself; it functions coherently within the context of the complete Linux operating system. Linux is never used in combination with GNU accessories: the whole system is basically Linux without any GNU added, or Just Linux. All the so-called "GNU/Linux" distributions are really distributions of Linux.

Wdf is a gesture?

>using Loonix

>in Linux
Look I don't want to be picky but a GTK problem is not a kernel problem.

You Sup Forumsirgins need to figure out your shit.