LMAO, Ryzen is already causing a severe bottleneck at 4k

LMAO, Ryzen is already causing a severe bottleneck at 4k.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Njm0MBOwFTM
theregister.co.uk/2017/03/08/the_italian_job_amd_goes_to_naples/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naples
youtu.be/bIbwuLdHbMg?t=22m39s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

DELET PLS

Why don't they mention which intel they used?

Also I thought the gaming Ryzens would be the R5s because theoretically they should be able to achieve higher clock speeds thanks to less heat and less cores.

ITS NOT FAIR GUYS

Intel DED

It's written thete 6700k. r5 won't hve higher clock than r7 because the limitation is the voltage you can push. The process amd used to make their cpus have better perf/watt below 3.5Ghz but shit the bed at higher clock.

...

Ryzen is so fucking horrible, I'm constantly amazed at how bad it really is.

The fuck? I get ~90 FPS with my 1800X and twin 980 Ti's at 1440p.

>45 fps at 1080p
something tells me they don't have an error free testbed....

>single game benchmark

upvoted ;)

amd fanboys will just shill the next meme resolution (5k and 8k)

im pretty happy with my 1080 and my 1700 overclocked.

the difference i noticed in performance when gaming at 1440p 144hz g-sync was that the dips i got with my 6700k are gone. the overall fps appears to be about 5-10fps lower but its way more consistant.

Something else i noticed. i can render out a movie iin premiere while gaming and its still smooth AF. i could never do this on the 6700k lol, and i had that at 4.5ghz.

im glad i changed to AMD :)

I'm still gonna go from a 6700k to 1800x just because I need more cores for work related. A loss of 5-10 fps really makes 0 diffierence in games.

Just wait 8 years, surely AMD will have fixed Ryzen by then

It's not just games bucko

Most likely because even through the amd has low avarage fps. It is not 100% usage on all cores.

Meanwhile 50% core usage on r7 so less chance to cause stutter

>caring about 4K meme for gaymurs

lel

How about 1080p?

yeah maybe. you can even see it in ops pic.

>still posting that bench of an early bugged review.

Lmao all the reviews show the same thing

ok.

Fuck me whats going on with AMD Ryzen optimization? Guess its gonna be like the old 290 and 390x days where we have to wait fucking years to go back and play games.

Thank god i got my 390x just before that horrid 480 launch

Sadly that is literally a rigged benchmark.

Look at their methodology:

"in the interest of fairness, any technology which favours either AMD or NVIDIA is disabled. More specifically, this refers to PhysX, Hairworks and more. "

Meanwhile in real benchmarks.

You tell me I buy a GTX1080 Ti and I should not enable any PhysX or Hairworks effect when I play games?

>damage control
>the thread

all credibility eteknix had is now out the window. it was always a trash site tbqh.

so ur saying that if i buy amd im losing 2 average frames in games while also blowing any intel cpu the fuck out at anything multithreaded?

>Using different GPUs to compare CPU performance

>all credibility eteknix had is now out the window.
because some random polaks with weird numbers that make no sense for 6700k either made a claim, okay

>phonesposters

Never have I seen so many people become so angry and upset that there is more competition in the CPU market.

...Should we tell him about X99?

oh look, it's that polish nvidia/intel shill site that said that my fury x performs like shit in games like gta 5, meanwhile I can run it at 4k with no problems

This is obviously fake. All other reviewers showed Ryzen getting well over 60fps in those games. They aren't going to suddenly drop at 4K.

are you retarded?

Meanwhile, in application+gaming benchmarks.

>Nvidia paid game (Hitman) artifically throttles AMD CPU
>AMD optimised game from before Ryzen got released is capable of getting max out of any CPU
dirty little jews

FAKE NEWS

You have forgoten the Ryzen 9

So basically all Intel/Nvidia sponsored software (like Hitman or anything adobe) are running like shit on AMD hardware, but everything either independent or sponsored by AMD gets maximum out of any hardware it's given.

Seriously, have a look at which games Ryzen loses in, and in which it wins, and then have a look at whose logo is on the cover. Either Intel/Nvidia are really shit with code optimisation, or they are doing a shit job intentionally.

Your graphs are not graphs

not graphs

This is true, I get more frame rate than that with a fucking 12 core datacenter Xeon which has single core performance comparable to a fucking FX 8350.

Why everyone cares so much about games?
This is literally the last thing PC should be used for.

and i was wondering when the shill will post

>Sadly that is literally a rigged benchmark.


gameworks running on gpus somehow affect the cpu

holy fuck this has to be the most stupied thing a shill ever said

kek beat that fag
youtube.com/watch?v=Njm0MBOwFTM

AYYYMDPOOJEETS ON SUICIDE WATCH
FUCKING DIE DISGUSTING CURRYNIGGERS

why do people only care about ryzens gaming performance and say its trash / failed / buzzwords when it can beat the high end i7s in basically everything else?

also why dont amd have a server chip to compete with xeons? does anyone make one?

>also why dont amd have a server chip to compete with xeons? does anyone make one?

theregister.co.uk/2017/03/08/the_italian_job_amd_goes_to_naples/

I'm gonna buy ryzen if you want to or not, LMAO.

>AMD does an Italian job
what does thia mean.

Converting the histograms above gives the following:
In other words, Ryzen has a problem at the lower end. It's numbers at the 25th % and up are fine. In fact, both have the same median. It's between .1% and 25% that the problem exists.

GTA V

1800X
.1% 70 fps
1% 74 fps
10% 82 fps
25% 82 fps
50% 90 fps
75% 98 fps
90% 106 fps
99% 126 fps

7700K
.1% 82 fps
1% 90 fps
10% 102 fps
25% 106 fps
50% 110 fps
75% 118 fps
90% 126 fps
99% 138 fps

Here, the 1800X is consistently about 80-85% as fast as the 7700K and the results are far more clustered for both chips.

Personally, I'd find these kind of numbers with .1%, 1%, and 50% and an included histogram more useful than what we get now. And with Excel, it's not hard to do.

Because that's the most intensive job you do on your average desktop. People who render or compile shit 24/7 are a minority.

new opetrons will be forged deep under naples mountain range
one chip to rule them all!

7 r7 was given to dwarves
5 r5 will go to humans
and 3 r3 will go to elves, because they are special fuckers and deserve it

but i mean in almost every case its a 2-3 fps difference in intel or amds favor yet people (not just the shitposters here) act like its not performing to an acceptable standard. they also seem to forget the inane price difference

and the psp is the eye of sauron?
but seriously what does to do an italian job mean

Napels is Italian region/city, that's all.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naples

whatever, Italian job seems to imply heist from what i googled.

>act like its not performing to an acceptable standard
people look at graph, graph line is shorter, people do not calculate percents, look at proper metrics they just see shorter graph

peasantry 101

AMD is seriously the worst tech company in the universe.

They're like the cheap chinese knock-off version of real companies like Intel & Nvidia.

Bruh.
A fucking POTATO can run Overwatch on 60fps.
My fucking CAT could run Overwatch on 60fps.

What the fuck, bruh.

> Single threaded application
> less-cores cpu comes out ahead
Holy shit, AMD should just burn down their offices and commit sudoku already.

...

Still not as good as the original.

I really don't know why mods aren't deleting these GAYMUR benchmark threads anymore. They've been spammed here so many times since Ryzen launched, it's fucking ridiculous.

kek

Keep shitposting faggot. In a few weeks when AMD rolls out Ryzen drivers it'll send Intel packing.

Lol, what the fuck is with that picture? It doesn't make any sense

>Because that's the most intensive job you do on your average desktop
Maybe if you are a pathetic NEET from Sup Forums.

>why isn't info being censored
It's like you are not longer on rebbit.

bet you never designed your own site, pleb!

fucking christ who makes these, i can't read any of this

Most issues are because of Windows 10
> Randomly throws threads around between cores in different CCX's, so that data needs to be transferred between L3 cache pools all the time
> Treats all cores as having individual L3 cache pools

AMD has already updated Linux to behave correctly. Microsoft needs to pull their finger out.

At least with Ryzen, the issues we see can be fixed via software/BIOS updates.
Intel's issues were hardware related.
> Buggy chipset crippling SATA performance
> TSX broken, and having to be permanently disabled

Don't you Sup Forums faggots run Windows 7?

What is that excuse about 10 now?

Stop reaching.

Shills will use any excuse they can.

We do, but reviewers run Windows 10 when they benchmark.

only videogamers use Windows.

that's it, i'm selling my 1800x NOW!

>cant afford monitor from after 2010
>b-but 1080p?

INTURD IS GETTING DESTROYED EVEN IN GAYMEN

HHHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHHAAHAHAHHHAH

only autists use linux

>only videogamers use Windows.
only videogamers have to use windows.
I literally don't know why anybody who doesn't play games uses windows.

Sound and video editing software is still superior in Windows.

You could run it in VM, but according to my friend who does video editing there are some problems with sound playback that he can't fix so - for work reasons he uses it.

>Sound and video editing software is still superior in Windows.

I like how the motherboard, revision settings are not stated.

I have been waiting for a review that just shows all the frame times. The total picture, thank you man

Lots of problems handicapping Ryzen. Once those are fixed, it's off to the races.

This is SFW board you fucking niggerkike.
I almost got fired because of you.

>Polish subhumans
>proper benchmarks

pick one

Loses while only using 4 cores (one of which was a logical one due to scheduler issues). At stock clocks.
>7700k is 106% of the performance
>at 116% of the clock speed

I almost got promoted because of that guy. Shut the fuck up.

youtu.be/bIbwuLdHbMg?t=22m39s

whole podcast is hilarious, but this part is important for you

>look at pic
>kurva polska
>he has to shill because brits and germans don't want him cleaning the toilett anymore
TOPKEK, Jacek.

>we don't support ECC(c)Gigabyte
>wendel: "totally works"

this is gold

>browsing Sup Forums at work

What else is he going to do at work?

Thanks for praising my OC.

Something is wrong with those benchmarks. Even my shitty RX480 runs hitman better than that on 1080p.