He hasn't made the upgrade to Fedora yet

>He hasn't made the upgrade to Fedora yet

Why not?

>Secure
>Best package manager
>Best integration of the Gnome desktop
>Easy to install and use yet is widely used by professionals

It's easy to say Fedora is the best and most professional distro!

Other urls found in this thread:

nhentai.net/g/83641/
simple-talk.com/opinion/geek-of-the-week/linus-torvalds,-geek-of-the-week/
tuxradar.com/content/interview-linus-torvalds-linux-format-163
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>integration of the Gnome desktop
>"easy' as a merit when it's actually a downside packaged with bloat

>being a beta tester for NSA/Red Hat/freedesktop cabal
>willfully getting your ass fucked by poettering and co.
no wonder you're posting gay mongolian drawings

does it craft all your selinux polices for you and does SELinux default to permissive

>posts a tantalizing image
>doesn't provide sauce

Because I actually want to use my computer.

Because I like memes so I use Arch.

>fedora
>best package manager
what did he mean by this?

Yes yes Fedora is great but so is this OP, source?

Why would I ever use anything but an Ubuntu minimal installation?
>No bloat
>No botnet
>No bullshit
>No fedora-tipping
Is there some way in which Ubuntu repos or aptitude/apt-get are deficient that I'm not aware of? Is there any other benefit to using another distro apart from the repos, package manager, and bloatware?

nhentai.net/g/83641/

Fedora does have a clear policy about what can be included in the distribution, and it seems to be followed carefully. The policy requires that most software and all fonts be available under a free license, but makes an exception for certain kinds of nonfree firmware. Unfortunately, the decision to allow that firmware in the policy keeps Fedora from meeting the free system distribution guidelines.

thanks senpai. great reaction image btw

I was trying out on Fedora yesterday a Live USB stick, but was running into some issues. Firefox wouldn't run (something about a missing profile), and after opening something from the dash, the dash got locked and I couldn't pull it up again. There were a few other issues that I can recall explicitly.

How likely is it that actually installing it would fix any of those issues?

>reinstalling with every major update

that boy is my favorite

>tfw no qt strong tomboy (male) to break

I used to it was okay

I went Ubuntu -> Fedora -> Arch -> Manjaro

I'd honestly install it, but the name puts me off. Wouldn't want a distro named Fedora on my machine tbqhwyfam

Fedora is really good! The lxde spin is a lot more finished looking than Lubuntu, but Lubuntu has more gui and is therefore easier for me to use.

No need to reinstall to upgrade.
dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=25

And also makes it a viable machine for most users.

i'm currently using 24 and i'm not going to use this wayland garbae

>best package manager
shitty knockoff Zypper
>Gnome is a benefit
>Easy to install
anaconda bricks machines every other release, worst installer there is
>used by professionals
Lennart did this.

Releases way way too fast, support period isn't nearly long enough.

t. Debian stable

>Best package manager
the best package manager for rpm is zypper

SuSE is better.

Does Linus still use this piece of shit?

>using Fedora
>when another much better and longer supported rpm based distro exist

>Windows settings
>on Loonix

CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP!

...

>try to install tumbleweed
>get the same grub2 error everytime at 98%

Fedora just werks.

>insecure
>unstable
>red hat testing ground
>no drivers
>all FOSS piece of shit software only available for download, except vlc
>used by people who want an easy to use distro without looking like Ubuntu babbies
Fuck off you degenerate weaboo

yast 5/5
more distros should have something like this

So fix grub? Or fix your partitions.

My only gripe with Yast is that it's not default-KDE so sometimes finding settings is a pain. Most docs don't cover opensuse's special snowflake configurator even if it is vastly superior.

>Best package manager
NO CHOISE OF PACKAGE VERSION

>nhentai
enjoy the malware

Suse has pretty decent documentation though.

The best policy is the debian policy.

No non-free software at all, unless you turn on non-free software.

You mean like this?

The kernel in SuSE contains non-free blobs.
Debian contains literally 0% non-free anything unless you specify it. This includes kernel blobs.

Yast is so based when it comes to graphical configuration of pretty much anything, honestly Redhat should make its own version.

>going full retard for syndromeD

I've found Yast to be pretty good. The only problem I've found is that when it breaks it really really breaks.

Linus Torvalds confirmed a Fedora wearing babby :^)
simple-talk.com/opinion/geek-of-the-week/linus-torvalds,-geek-of-the-week/
tuxradar.com/content/interview-linus-torvalds-linux-format-163

That would be pretty fucking neat to have on CentOS

I've been using it on both Laptop and Desktop, thankfully it hasn't happened.

And good thing I'm on btrfs, if It does break catastrophically I'll just rollback.

nah its solver is great, usually when it breaks on me it's cause i added the wrong version's repo and accidentally pulled in from factory or something. Mostly packages are locked to their own repo of origin so it takes months to cause problems.

Webmin is the closest thing to Yast at the moment.

Though
>webui

Well I end up dealing with webui anyway since OBS is like suse's personal AUR.

Eh, kernel firmware is something I can deal with, most new Intel chips don't even work without proprietary sound/graphic firmware

Which means users have to endure the awful experience of installing rpmfusion and RussianFedora to get decent looking fonts, nVidia drivers and software with features for which there might be US patents. This has nothing to do with freedom. It's only legal protection for US based copnay (RedHat).

Fedora is getting too much hype lately. It's pretty user-unfriendly distribution. There's a focus on average joe and choices are reduced or removed. I'll rather stick with Debian and choose.

>It's pretty user-unfriendly distribution.
That's a good thing.
Look at mint and ubuntu.

>m'cuck *tips computer*