So.. i5's are obsolete, I guess?
So.. i5's are obsolete, I guess?
...
drake has great taste in women desu
Who is this nigger?
>4c vs 6c
Not a fair comparison
>software H.264
Is this 2009?
I like how you can get the 6 core for the cost of the Intel 4 core(without HT) while also getting a cheaper motherboard.
Prices are cheaper for the 1600
>hardware encoding
Nice QUALITY you have there.
Bbut day1 benchmarks told me differently, how can THIS BE
If Intel had 8 cores at 5.0GHz it would be MUUUUCH better
Same exact price. It's highly relevant.
If Intel had 8 cores at 5.0 it would need to be operated behind blast doors.
The normal 1600 is cheaper as well, and can reach the same clockspeeds as the 1600X
What's the next complaint? It's not fair to overclock because Intel locks it for all SKUs but two?
My dear Intel how can this happen to you, you were the best, just the best
>comparing a 6 core to a quad core
AMDfags are this desperate
So you would buy the 6600k ?
Lol
same price point you retarded nigger
how did you pass your initiation? delet that post before your jewtel wrangler sees it and cancels the "partnership"
>has to add irrelevant strain to make a point
meh, ryzen can't even have consistent FPS.
>h264
lol
Really makes you think.
Mmm...
lol
...
...
>i5's are obsolete
*Intel is obsolete.
t. Pooland
>tfw still on Phenom X4 and no mITX am4 boards yet
...
Intel is a stuttering piece of shit
the goat
>Sleeping Dogs
>Rise of the Tomb Raider
What the fuck
Same price, fucko, it's the same argument people were using when comparing the Ryzen 7 to the 7700k even though it competes with the 6900k because "they're the same price, you can't choose what you compete against, hurr durr derp"
WTF
Why would AMD release a 13 core???
Honestly shocking
same here bro. my phenom is still chugging along for now, but the mobo situation is annoying.