>Those 8th Generation Core laptops may be more attractive to customers. The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years. >The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. >will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors. >slower than 14-nm >Intel acknowledged the speeds during the manufacturing event, with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years. > with a chart showing 10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years. >10-nm chips catching up with 14-nm chip performance in one to two years. >two years
I was actually waiting for cannon-lake before I built my new PC
On one hand I'm not in a hurry to build a PC but on the other hand I was expecting a much better payoff for waiting for cannonlake, I guess I'll be waiting longer than I expected.
Dylan Bell
>waiting Oh so you're team red now?
Brayden Price
Intel should have invested more into R&D and fabs instead of Feminist Frequency and (((((((((((Diversity))))))))))
Jayden Smith
Wow, hilarious
Carter Gomez
Nope. I've heard too many bad anecdotes about AMD, I don't want to sound like an intel fanboy but I like things to just werk. If AMD can get rid of that stigma I'll go red.
Oliver Ward
You're waiting for 2019? Because that's after Cannonlake.
Eli Martinez
I'm really wondering where you heard those anecdotes because while AMD's CPUs have been renowned as poor performing- being unreliable is something I've never heard.
Jack Taylor
>I was expecting a much better payoff for waiting for cannonlake
You had people telling you it's nothing but a dieshrink of Skylake and you were expecting "a much better payoff"
From fucking what?
Michael Sanders
>Intel, can i get a new architecture?
>22nm? What do you need 32nm for? >Help, Police!!! This man is tryin to kill me over 5% performance increase!!! >He, you are going to hear from this from my lawyer.
Logan Green
Man Intel was so not ready for Ryzen.
Aaron Mitchell
>on the other hand I was expecting a much better payoff for waiting What, exactly, we're you expecting? We've known that this would not be a significant bump for a long time now and anyone with more than two brain cells knew not to expect too much from it. >I've heard too many bad anecdotes about AMD, I don't want to sound like an intel fanboy but I like things to just werk. You do sound like an Intel shill. A CPU is a CPU is a CPU. If it doesn't just work then there's something seriously wrong. What sort of anecdotes have you heard?
Jason Martin
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
404 issuE NOT FOUND
Connor Anderson
this
Nathan Miller
My favorite thing in the article is the last line:
> "Intel has a goal of delivering a minimum of 15 percent improvement in chip performance on an annual basis."
And I have a goal of fucking 50 new women this year. Can you guess whose goal is more realistic?
Nicholas Russell
>>>/reddit/
Ethan Long
>>I've heard too many bad anecdotes about AMD
WTF are you talking about?
Go onto Newegg and look at the number of eggs for Ryzen:
Same with Intel, too. Say what you want about price and speed, both companies are turning out absolutely excellent quality products.
I'll bet every single one of the "bad anecdotes" you've "heard" about have been a result of mobo problems, or else someone didn't do their research and put together a mis-matched build.
Xavier Bell
7 gen is perfect
Luis Sullivan
>I've heard too many bad anecdotes about AMD I specifically like anecdotes about Calculator bug, about dying USB ports, about frying CPU memory controller with DDR3 memory, about blocking BCLK overclocking...
Oh wait.
John Evans
>hehe goy >sustainability right? LOL >good goy
Jeremiah Hill
jewish physics
Cameron Foster
just bought a skylake 6 months ago
feels good
Justin Wood
Wasn't Intel going off about how Samsung's 10nm process is inferior to theirs?
Don't Samsung 10nm chips perform faster and cooler than Samsung 14nm chips?
Robert White
>ARM >X64 pick one
Grayson Cox
>The first 10-nm Cannonlake chips will be slower than 14-nm 8th Generation Core processors