Leaked Vega slides showing it beating Titan Xp (the new Titan)

Leaked Vega slides showing it beating Titan Xp (the new Titan).

Nvidia is finished!

where did you get these from?

He got them from my uncle who works at nintendo

(((leaked)))

ofuq

I wouldn't really be surprised if it's faster than gp102 in certain titles, it's both a bigger chip and a new architecture.

I wonder where these 'leaks' come from.

>Human eye can't see past 60 FPS or 3.5 GB

-Nvidia

> Vulkan
> made by amd
Of course it will beat Nvidia on Vulkan, faggot.

>may 8


Reveal at GTC? Fucking nice

come to think of it 140 fps on 4K is pretty fucking crazy

Fake and gay

Wait, these cards can run Doom at 4k on ultra at 100+fps? I thought they'd struggle to reach 60.

HBM and big die, lads.

Vulkan is best case, but even 20% slower than that is competitive.
Meanwhile getting more perf from the tessellation slider is free performance.

>even 20% slower than that is competitive.
King Pajeet & frinds were supposed to fix shader utilization in Vega so it's probably less. Maybe 5-7% difference at worst.

It'll be interesting to see reviewers not test a single dx12 game in 2 months.
Or using Skylake instead of Ryzen

>It's ok when nvidia does it

can't wait for suddenly ROTR,warhammer,BF1 and doom are shit for testing GPUs

you should test only with GTA5, WD2 and some other random game everyone already forgot about

>NEWER GPU IS FASTER THAN OLDER GPU


WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

This desu, another massive failure by AMD

oy vey splendid observation brothers, here's 3.5 shekels for your troubles

>VEGA RUNS FASTER ON THINGS OPTIMIZED FOR AMD THAN NVIDIA

How old is the TitanXp?

Both contemporary APIs are "optimized" for AMD rather than Nvidia.

Rly made me ponder

4k is a meme resolutiin ,try 1600x900

I'll believe it when I see it, besides
>Vulkan
>Doom
Very specific case that they would have fine tuned their hardware for considering they have demoed it to death. I love Vulkan as much as the next guy but current library is mostly DX11 and I would like to see its performance with other Vulkan/DX12 titles besides Doom.

Both are good resolutions.

>$700 gpus in 2017 on 2006 resolutions

that's faked, you know

I am an AMD fan and even I can smell bullshit.

>Titan Xp getting 190% the performance of the 1080
>Not something believable like 130-145%
Yeah this is fake.

NEW GPU FASTER THAN OLDER GPU AMAZING AMD

Looks like a GTC slide, if it's not faked of course

Fake as fuck. No one even has the new titan xp to even test it. I can bet my money vega will be at BEST 1080(non ti) level performance while poojet mentions good price/performance

older than nvidia wants you to think (they were selling the same shit as quadro p6000 or something before)

Your money is as good as wasted.

GTC is an nVidia only event. AMD has never participated in it.

Why do you think that can't change?

Because the fucking event is hosted by nVidia.

Since you didn't at least throw in some qualifiers like at 1080p, you're fucked.
Vega will beat even the 1080Ti at 4K so hard.

>Technology falls from the sky

AYY LMAAAOOOOOOO

at this point AMD needs to completely BTFO nvidia if they want people to buy vega

Source or gtfo.

People will still buy NVIDIA.

Gaming cattle enables worst kinds of business practices for this market. Genocide when?

Intel: BTFO
Nvidia: BTFO

2017 confirmed for being the year AMD finally got their shit together again.

AMD gave Nvidia the chance to pick up Vulkan, it's open source. Unlike anything that Nvidia does to try and cripple the competition.

Nvidia have been 'winning' on DOOM since release, as they have the more powerful cards, hopefully just until Vega releases.

>2017 confirmed for being the year AMD finally got their shit together again.
About fucking time.

>AMD gave Nvidia the chance to pick up Vulkan, it's open source.
Almost everything AMD does is open-fucking-source.

AMD completely BTFO Nvidia from 2008 all the way up into 2014.
People still bought Nvidia.

It's just like when AMD was completely BTFOing Intel from 2000-2008, but people still bought Intel.
AMD marketing sucks ass and Nvidia fanboys will always be delusional.

>Intel: BTFO
LOL no

Ryzen is new hardware, the software needs to catch up. Once games begin to use more than one core, Ryzen will become more and more powerful.

The i7's have no overhead, whereas Ryzen has a shittonne.

>no min framerate
nice try shlomo

>day 0 benches

Precisely, which makes them the more user and industry friendly company. Which is why I personally prefer them, even if atm they aren't the most powerful thing in the PC market.

DigitalFoundry benchmark from yesterday, amd's still shit

Got to love having some actual competition in the industry again. Still not buying their filthy pajeet shit though, obviously.

>Doom Vulkan
So when the Titan is using open GL they'll be about even?

Actually better than I thought, it's a shame it doesn't actually destroy the Titan by that much when both cards are using their optimal API.

>using NVIDIA's GPUs
(You), Ramesh. Holy fucking shit you're doing it since Ryzen launch cald down dude.

>10 core 6950x has no ovearhead
>Once games begin to ose more than one core..
>what is 6900k

Sorry bud, amd fucked up big time with ryzen

just fucking this.

...

Don't get too excited. OP's pic is a photoshop made by a stinky indian. The new titan xp hasn't even been released. Expect 1080 levels of performance out of vega, no more

Get out of here Gaymer trash. No one buys CPUs for gaming anyway.

>The new titan xp
>new
>titan
>xp
Oshit. Hilarious.

Gonna need a new version of this.

I really want Vega to be amazing
But I am the guy in that picture
I have zero faith in leaked shit unless it's French people showing it

Yes, people who upgrade their CPUs most oftenly are gaymen

>thinking gaming is what determines if a cpu is good or not
>using avg fps as an indicator of what the gaming experience is
>not even putting 0,1% or 1%
>no frametimes

good goy

It is, low framerates means the cores of the cpu are shit, and they can't feed the GPU information fast enough

>dx12 with an nvidia GPU
kill yourself

...

The human eye can't see more than 240p.

I am pretty sure people upgrade their CPU when it can't keep up anymore with average tasks or they want more productive performance. Both of which Ryzen does much better than Jewtel(TM) Stutterlake (TM) for the price.

>amd 480
Fuck off with your low end shit tier hardware you slime

In the odd chance that this isn't fake, the real interesting part is actually the last line, since it implies the release date.

But since it is fake, OP is a fag.

GLORIOUS NVIDIA DRIVERS I ASSURE YOU YOU CAN'T SEE PAST 3.5 GIGABYTES.

Then how does it explain ryzen CPUs being at less than 50% utilization in most game.

>AMD sandbags
>Nvidia creates fake "leak" to generate false hype
>People think the leak is real and are extremely disappointed when the card comes and doesn't perform to "leaked" expectations
>AMD reputation ruined
All according to plan.

Shitty novideo drivers.

Because it's horseshit, not unpotimized, but shit at a physical hardware level

Actually, given that Intel will go towards 6c/12t and 8c/16t processors with Skylake-X (Kabylake-X) its practically certain more software will be optimized for multi core cpus.

If they can't manage to pricematch Ryzen, no point in buying it though.

i saw a leak that showed vega having 1 000 000 fps, nvidia is finished!

AMDtards jerk off all day about fake leak.

>TitanXP is 10% faster than a 1080ti

Seems pretty consistent

>what is P6000

OR Game devs didn't bother coding their games to utilize more than 4 threads because of Jewtel(TM) paying them $$$.

Why are you making shit up on the Internet?

CPU utilization numbers don't even show any hardware-related numbers, it just shows the amount of time that the OS schedules a thread to run on a CPU. If a process shows less than 100% CPU usage, that means that it doesn't want to run more than it does. Such as by blocking or by not having enough runnable threads to cover all CPUs in the system.

>from yesterday
you mean from 2 weeks back?

Or they coded them to evade numerous Intel's errata.

Is that Vulkan? Those results seem too good for Vulkan.
But if true, that's actually more impressive results than I expected for the 1080Ti in Doom Vulkan 4K.
If so this is still a 20% improvement still over the 1080Ti which seems too high.

>what is 6900k
best gaming CPU on the market if money is not concern?

>a fucking housefire
Nah.

Different CPU and memory can affect results, Doom loves a lot of threads

can't you read its written AVERAGE

>if money is not concern

see? you can buy a new house

>best gaming CPU on the market if money is not concern?
Only because Nvidia drivers are proven to be gimping Ryzen, friendo.
When Vega comes, that'll change.

I should've said "was best gaming cpu"

i'd say 1600x is the best CPU right now.

>leaked Fiji slides show the Fury X beating the Titan X
And look what happened there
AMDrones never learn now, do they?