IMPORTANT - Ubuntu 16.04.2 ISO may be compromised

downloaded torrent from here
ubuntu.com/download/alternative-downloads
The sha256 sum don't match
releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/SHA256SUMS

Other urls found in this thread:

releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

May have been corrupted in the process

Try the torrent and if that's also different then it could've been compromised

Oh fuck saw that you dled the torrent

Try the direct download and check the date of the torrent

This is the one with different sha256 sum
ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent 2017-02-16 23:57
releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent

Afaik the BitTorrent protocol is supposed to hash check each separate piece but something's obv gone wrong since the torrent is too old to have been replaced.

Problem is on your end, install gentoo

One's 32-bit the other 64-bit.

>Problem is on your end
millions of people since the torrent is like 3 months old
Here it is the SHA256

No you nigger

Get the direct dl and check that

install gentoo

the sha256 don't match you autist I'm downloading the torrent and then I'll download from a mirror

I deleted the image because of personal info

that's nice, lucas.

just use the direct DL. they keep that more up-to-date than the torrents

seriously delete this

?? all the info is still there

Windows 10 doesn't have this problem

welcome to Sup Forums

the iso from direct download and from torrent is the same you autist

>they keep that more up-to-date than the torrents
The hash should still match. They don't re-release without version numbering, ever (e.g. 16.04.2 wouldn't be release twice, it would be *4.3, etc).

I know you are obsessed with having personal info and leaking, etc but this is a iso compromise
>b-but I did it for the lol
how this is not reddit 2.0?
The level of people here just check this thread there are two people thinking they "update" the .iso with the same filename and same SHA256.

Deep breaths user

I am verifying your claim myself, but I seriously doubt a compromised ISO would be seeded with nobody aware.

>they keep that more up-to-date than the torrents

>I am verifying your claim myself
>I think they released the same iso with different hash
embarrassing.

I never said that, Lucas.

OP is right, hashes on both i386 and amd64 torrents don't match, I haven't downloaded from the FTP or their site though
It wouldn't surprise me of this was Canonical incompetency and not a compromised ISO
Most people who download Ubuntu wouldn't check their downloads

Install Gentoo.

What about signing keys? I have piss poor internet so still a ways to go

>I was just pretending to be a retard

85.238.113.251

>OP is right, hashes on both i386 and amd64 torrents don't match
You're both wrong, and retarded or shitposting (aka still retarded).
Pic related, hashes match sighing key, and sha256 matches amd64 ISO, meaning not compromised unless their private keys are.

>sha256 matches amd64 ISO
not the torrent one

$ sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS
ubuntu-16.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso: OK

it's Linux mint infected iso episode all over again

Don't trust

He is CIAnigger xD

...

Canonical is finished and bankrupt!

OP a true retard

You forgot to censor your username in the first line.

>evading ban
that's not how it works user

>ban
lol you fucking idiot

haha XDdDDDadD lmao nice meme xDD