Why does Sup Forums prefer dark themes?

why does Sup Forums prefer dark themes?

They hurt you eyes less when you spend countless hours staring at a screen, especially in the dark. Plus, they look nice.

Easier on the eyes, and uses less battery on AMOLED screens.

This
It's also higher contrast which is nicer

to fit 2B's and 9S's clothes :3

that's a pretty cute egg

n-nani!?

Dark themes are objectively better.

What matters is the content, the content is usually text. Therefore the text should be light (1) and the background should be lack of light (0). The only reason that paper is white because it's cheaper.

Being blinded by a 24" white lamp and trying to look for some dark spots in the field of light just doesn't make any sense. Imagine listening to music, but instead of listening to sounds, you would actually have white noise with some quiet breaks.

...

paper is white because it's easier to write on it

delet

Green text on black background>>>anything else.

What about blackboards?

because night is nice time for doing anything

I don't, most of them look like fucking shit and I keep my room comfortably lit so my eyes don't hurt at night.

>she doesn't just make the area where text appears black while keeping the rest light

don't tell me you actually browse like that.. where you HAVE to have your 2d girl showing at all times

Because it matches my intelligent, nihilistic, and wicked sense of humour.

Ow
>full screen browsing
Shiggy

I actually prefer light themes since most content on websites is light. If you use a dark theme and then switch to something lighter you just get blinded.

Because it's the same color as my soul.
Seriously though; I find it easier to read text, and because my eyes are fucked due floaters.

gay

It's definitely cheaper to bleach paper than it is to color it. Approximately $2 more per 500 ream.

it's cute

>wasting space
lol

>2bara.jpg

To reflect the darkness of my soul.

>she

pls refrain from scumposting

>50696[]
>why does Sup Forums prefer dark themes?
Easier on the eyes

Because there exist 3 types of astigmatism that 50% of the human population are afflicted with in regards to how eyes respond to light,
and one of them causes bright backgrounds with dark letters to be uncomfortable while one other causes the same but with dark backgrounds and bright letters.

Congratulations, you are now a little bit smarter.
A little bit smarter than low-level nigger, but smarter nonetheless.

But it's not easier on the eyes. Look at this picture. The black line appears to be slimmer than the white line. Meaning it looks sharper. Which makes shapes consisting of multiple small lines (like text) easier to read.
Also, you are normally awake and doing things during daytime. When the sun is shining brightly. Giving you a bright background for everything. Which is what your eyes are optimized for. In the dark, your eyes still have to adjust to the brightest source of light as to not get hurt from it. So stop sitting in a dark room staring at your screen. Turn on the lights.

dark themes never use full black, retard.

good point
now how about some proof other than this little anecdote

Implying that fixes the problem.

Which gives you even less contrast. Making it even harder to distinguish from the background. Good work.

now how about some proof for dark themes being easier on the yes in the first place

>The black line appears to be slimmer than the white line.
they look the same width to me

yea no its easier on my eyes
just use a better font
>the black line appears to be slimmer
for you
>you are normally awake during daytime
says who?

stop filling things in for me

It's an undeniable physical phenomenon. Even my phone camera can show it.

it only happens if the image is blurred, and my eyesight is fine

>I dont know how cameras work
>I use my Automode on my phone for pictures
bad excuse try again

Show me a photo where this is not the case then. I will wait :)

>But it's not easier on the eyes.
Depends on which type of astigmatism you have.
Telling others it's now easier on the eyes is like a lactose intolerant person telling someone who is tolerant that milk is bad.
You only make yourself look retarded.

>Depends on which type of astigmatism you have.
It really doesn't. Educate yourself about astigmatism.

I dont have my camera on me kid

It really does. I have educated myself on the types of astigmatism.
Straight from an ophthalmologist, which you obviously aren't.

So you best stop being retarded.

...

>save battery
>don't burn your eyes at night
>no AMOLED Burn in.
>works nice with dark keyboard
>look nice

btfo lmao desu desu senpai

amoled: grey on black
other: light grey on dark grey (low contrast white on black)

Dark themes are stupid and I hate when sites uses them.

White text on dark background makes eyes hurt from reading, while black on white background is safer and healther for your eyes too.

But since 12 year old kids, especially boys, LOVES dark themes, I guess this is something you grow out with age.

The white line is still wider than the black one.

I can agree with turning the lights on. I don't use any dark themes on my computer, just my phone uses mostly black to save battery on amoled.

>whines about 12 year old kids
>acts like a full-of-itself intolerant 12 year old kid
Does not compute.

I used to, but not anymore. Dark theme hurts my eyes.

dark text on a light background is better for your eyes than vice versa.

That's because it stimulates your eyes when you're reading something dark on light therefore your eyes don't need to adjust as much.

The only time a dark theme is good is if you're some kind of pleb who doesn't have good ambient lighting in your room.

>macOS now has nightshift (f.lux) built in
lmao
>b-b-but I can just install something for that
hahaha lincucks

they both use ~2-3px in that picture
if there's any difference, it's too subtle to be an issue

my linux-based phone has that built in as well

cool, which phone?

>she

>use dark themes because they are soothing to me
>my yearly eyesight checkups come back perfect
>have no issues with darkness or brightness
>consult with doctor and learn that it differs from person to person on how they respond to such shit as backgrounds

>some butthurt armchair specialist on the Internet is telling me it's bad for my eyes based on his simple-minded averages and small education when he can't even put me as an individual on the scale, but treats me as part of his preferred average

KEK
Too many retards on the Internet who don't know shit about eyesight.

'which phone' is the wrong question, did you mean which OS?
i'm using LineageOS, which retains LiveDisplay from CyanogenMod, which does the same thing as f.lux

ah, okay, so you're one of those ROM shufflers who buys junky lagdroid devices and then deals with buggy software for months at a time between switching ROMs

Both lines illuminate/darken about the same amount of pixels (3 at this point). But the bright line illuminates the affected pixels more than the dark line darkens them. Which again proofs the effect user wanted to disprove with it.
On another note, that is actually a bad photo. Since the full white background is very grey. Which obviously weakens the effect.

excuse me? it's a galaxy s4, a pretty common phone
i put cyanogenmod on it as soon as i got it, never touched the stock rom
the only rom change i've done it switching to lineageos, the reason should be obvious if you know anything about the two

You actually made a photo of your phone screen? Why are you even on Sup Forums?

>The black line appears to be slimmer than the white line.
>it's smaller and thus harder to see
>this is a good thing

>blurry objects are easier to see than sharp objects

i see what you mean, but it's very subtle, i'd imagine it'd only be a problem on blurry or over-exposed photos, or on displays with light bleed (like crt's)

The phenomenon is the same in both cases, only in the case of the black line, the white background blurs the line inwards, whereas in the other case, the line blurs outwards into the black background. Both are exactly as blurry, but the white line blurs in the right direction.

If you've cut your teeth on CRT screens, that level of blurriness is as naught.

>stand 10 meters away from the screen
>the black line is no longer visible
>the white line is visible all over the place
There's your answer.

If you've got a retard-19:6 monitor you might as well. You might also as well kys.

Even in the odd chance that you're right, you have at least your nomenclature wrong. Astigmatism is about anisotropism in focusing, not how the eyes "respond to light".

They most definitely do, retard.

Came here expecting a bunch of papers and studies and shit. Looks like Sup Forums.

We want to perpetuate the "dark and mysterious" hacker meme.

There are a couple spots on my screen where the backlight was forcibly compressed into the LCD panel. That made white blotches which are most apparent when displaying light colors. Rather than disassembling the screen to fix the problem I've just switched to dark colors everywhere.

Astigmatism is precisely the correct term and the nature of how the eye focuses in response to stimuli depending on its structure is precisely the difference between why someone gets tired out or uncomfortable depending on whether it is bright background or dark background with respectively contrasting text.
All eyes aren't born the same structurally.

...

delet

Easier on the eyes, consume less energy, it's uncommon to see a normie using it.

>replying to urslef